 Nike Lunarglide 3 |
| Full Name: Nike LunarGlide+ 3 |
| Category: Stability |
| Weight: 11 oz. (310 gr.) |
| Suggested Price: 100$ |
| Recommended For: Mild-overpronators who are looking for good cushioning while not sacrificing support or for neutral runners who want an extra bit of support |
UPDATE: We reviewed the new Nike Lunarglide 4.
Nike LunarGlide+ 3 General Info:
The Nike LunarGlide is back for 2011 and now with a completely updated sole unit and upper.
I’ve been a long time user of the original LunarGlide because it was a kind of the Jack of All trades for running shoes. I was surprised at how light and comfortable it felt that I ended up using it not just for running but also wore it casually every now and then. Fast forward to 2011 where Nike announced the LunarGlide+ 3, and this time I felt there are enough changes from the original to justify a new purchase. Right out of the box the new LunarGlide’s look slightly slimmer than the original and the impression at first wear is that it ‘fits like a glove’ or in this case a sock with lots of cushioning without really constricting your feet in an uneasy manner especially on the toe area, where I felt the original LG’s were a bit too roomy.
Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Sole Unit:
What I like most about the LunarGlide is that it provides both support and cushioning without compromising one or the other. The new version does it better because of the evolution of the Dynamic Support System: the midsole is designed like a wedge that provides more cushioning for over-pronators on heel impact and slowly rolls them back into normal position.
What this means is a more comfortable run whether you’re the type that lands on your heel or mid-foot, and I’m very happy with how bouncy this shoe feels even when running on concrete.
Lunarglide 1 vs 3 - Rear View
Nike has also added more cuts (flex grooves) on the bottom of the shoe especially on the outer sole so that the LunarGlide can flex really well with your foot. There aren’t as many grooves as in the Nike Free, but that’s not really what the LunarGlide is trying to be either. Another change I noticed was that the heel cap which was made of sturdy material was now downgraded to a heel clip. This was probably done in order to add to the softness and ventilation of the shoe and reduce the weight as well.
Nike Lunarglide 1 vs 3 - Outsole View
Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Upper:
After trying on the shoes for my first run I immediately felt that it was an even better fit than the first LunarGlides. The breathable mesh fabric remains pretty much the same as the original but the bonded material (synthetic overlay) now provides added protection at the toe area and crosses over at the mid-foot.
Lunarglide 1 vs 3 - Upper View
The tongue is actually attached to the shoe on the sides as well so that everything meshes together and that means fewer seams inside, which in turn reduces irritation. Another thing that you’ll notice, mainly because of its striking colors, is that they replaced the Nike Flywire with a different mid-foot strap/arch-wrap. The key difference is that the new arch-wrap goes under so that it can provide better support around your foot and not just from the sides. On top of this, Nike also added grooves into the sock liner so that it would work well with these new wrap-around straps. That all sounds well and good but in my opinion the material doesn’t look as durable as the Flywire. And it disrupts the overall look of the shoe because it looks like there’s a paper cut-out that’s popping up in the middle of the shoe.
Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Opinion:
One of the biggest hurdles in running is that you can actually become overwhelmed with the amount of info you need to in or consider before even starting to run. The LunarGlide eliminates a lot of the research required for finding the right shoe because it caters to a wide range of runners.
Earlier I referred to these shoes as the Jack of all trades but the LunarGlide+ 3 is even better, it’s a master of some! The snug fit is perfect and feels really good on your feet while still providing enough support to facilitate long runs. Some runners might actually have problems with how soft the shoe is.
All in all LunarGlide+ 3 is a really good all-around running shoe and is a significant step-up from its predecessors. It’s a lot softer & springy but still manages to feel even more secure on your foot. I’ve been using these shoes on the treadmill, on the track, on the road and I’ll be running my nest 10K race in these shoes next month as well.
Review by Erwin Ramos
Let us know what you think of this shoe in the comments!
Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Price Comparison:
 | Men's Nike Lunarglide+ 3 Running Shoe - Charcoal/red 13 RoadRunnerSports Free shipping, 60-day perfect fit guarantee: possible to exchange shoes after using them for two months. | $79.95 |
 | Nike - Lunarglide+ 3 (dark Grey/wolf Grey/volt/neptune Blue) - Footwear Zappos Free shipping both ways (free return shipping), 365 days returns | $88.00 |
Really good review,very helpful,well arranged.Thank you.:)
I have a pair of the original that i use mostly for long and easy runs, primarily because the upper doesnt wrap my foot well. Is the upper on this version more foot hugging?
Hello Tom. Yes, the new LunarGlide is definitely more hugging around the midfoot!
I have been curious about these ever since I saw the recent ad campaign. They look really cool but I wasn’t sure what type of runner they’re best for. Thanks for the info!
Hi Erwin, thank you so much for the review I’ve been looking for a review like this and hadn’t found it until now! I like that you compared the new lunarglide 3 with the previous lunaglide and that you found them to be better. I’ve been reading other reviews saying that this new lunarglide 3 is not as comfortable or durable as its predecessor. What do you think?
Good review, perhaps a bit too good.
I tried these shoes in the store at the treadmill – felt ok so I bought them. 5 days and 25k later I had to stop use them. For me they are far too soft, I had problems to reach 5:20/km while I usually idle at 4:30/km. I also got pain in my ancle because of the spongy sole. For me these shoes are like running on almost flat tires, but we’re all different.
Marcus, could you tell me the kind of shoes you are using?
I am experiencing the same problem with my nike shoes and I am looking for a solution….
Thank you !
I have a low arch. I also have peripheral neuropathy. I use AVIA walker, toning rocker shoes for running. Its rocker sole helps to take the impact away from front of the feet. They are very bulky and heavy shoes. I am practicing to run 5k and 10k. Any suggestion on running shoes with rocker soles and extra cushioing will be appreciated.
I loved the LunarGlide 2. So I purchased the LunarGlide 3 hoping it would be as good. Very disappointed. The to box is tight (I liked the roomy to box of the LG2). The sole seemed to lose it’s shock support very soon. The shoe lasted about 2 months before I had to get something else. I found this to be a poor iteration of the LunarGlide.
I purchased LunarGlider 3+ today. After purchase I went straight to the stadium for a run. After just 4km I started to hear some strange noise from the left foot. The yellow cushioning have been glued off, so tomorrow I have to go replace my shoes. The only problem is that I bought last LunarGlides in store…
About feel, one of the best shoes I have ever had on my feet. Very responsive, comfortable, pretty light and pretty cool. Feet really does not get soaked in sweat.
So, overall I’m satisfied with the feel, but I can’t believe that I have to go replace this shoes…
I’m running cross country in the fall and I’m looking for new running shoes. I visited a Nike store and they said that the Lunar Glide was good for cross country and a good shoe for it. Is this true? I don’t want to spend 100 dollars on running shoes and have them be painful.
I bought these about 2 months ago, Id never actually taken up running before and had read the reviews that these would be good for a flat footed and heavy runner which is me.
After 6 weeks of running twice weekly for a 4.4 km loop I can safely say these tick all the right boxes. Ive had absolutely no issues with blisters, the cushioning is amazing considering its not the traditional “Air” and I would highly recommend these shoes to the heavier runner (I’m 115kg 185cm tall).
I’m trying to source a few more pairs as I want to stockpile them. the New LunarGlide 4+ is out and I will try it but these are definitely a keeper.
Thank you so much for the info. I am a newy. Just bought my first pair of running shoes and this review helped A LOT! I am running my first 5kg next month. Looking forward!!
Hi guys, I have had the lunar glide 3 for about 4 months now and just like previous comments I have noticed the cushioning becomes really poor far too quickly. The first 100 miles were great lightweight, breathable, cushioned just like the perfect shoe but approaching 100 mile the cushioning was as someone described above “flat tires”. For this kind of price tag I would expect Nike to provide something much better therfore no more nike for me.
I am looking for Sports Shoes for my wife. She will be using the shoes for aerobic exercise, which requires lots of jumping. Which shoes do you suggest? Nike Lunarglide +3 or NikeLunarfly +3?
I have been using Nike Lunarglide 3 for anout 255 miles (400km), and they also become too soft now. Were great in beginning. But now the material in the back of heel is basically so soft that the whole shoe bend, when landing on surface. Normally the material behind the heel should be quite hard to stabilize the foot-shoe, but in this shoe it is just fabric with some plasic ring around. The fabric is now softened too much, so no stability anymore.
Plan to but Mizuno Wave Rider 16 next time, because they seems to last longer. I had old model. For neutral runners.
Asics were way too hard for me, and the material (Gel) get damaged by the heat and humidity where I live (Asia).