Nike Lunarglide+ 4 General Info:
At first glance, I fell in love with the sleek design and colors of the Nike Lunar Glide+4. Mine arrived in the Silver/Electric Green-Liquid Lime colorway. The reflective details are eye catching and well designed.
As an overpronator, I am used to running in heavier shoes needed to support my foot strike. When Nike’s ads hit during the summer about the LG4’s being a “dynamic support shoe” that was a lighter weight than the Lunar Glide 3 model, I was excited to test them out.
The Nike Lunar Glide+ 4’s innovative new features include the use of the Flywire Midfoot support system, implementing the Nike Lunarlon technology, and creating an overall lighter model than the LunarGlide 3’s.
Nike Lunarglide+ 4 Upper:
The LunarGlide 4 kept the seamless sleeve construction of the upper that was loved by the fans. The Upper is made of a single layer of constructed mesh, thus making this year’s model significantly lighter than the LG3, and offers more ventilation. After testing these shoes during hot, humid NYC mornings, these shoes held their own and my feet thankfully did not feel suffocated. The engineered mesh also has different sizes of perforations along the upper to give maximum breathability and flexibility.
The Lunarglide+ 3′s (previous model) midfoot support in the upper gave the “hugging” fit that runners loved, thanks to the Dynamic Fit lacing system. The new Lunarglide+ 4 feels snugger than the LG3’s because it replaces these straps with thee “Flywire” system.
Nike’s “Flywire” system is a network of multiple cords that run up sideways in the middle of the shoe. The cords are attached to the base of the shoe, and extend to the eyelets. Made with synthetic leather, the eyelets are durable to withstand the pressure from the Flywire system. Once the laces pass through the eyelets and are tightened, the cords’ elastic resistance applies pressure to the sides of the foot. The thermoplastic heel clip and Flywire work together to provide a “glove like” custom fit.
Being used to running in other stability shoes such as Brooks Adrenaline GTS 12 model, I was hesitant about the support of the mesh upper of the Lunarglide 4. While being used to heavier, firmer models such as the Brooks Adrenaline, the lightweight model’s single layer mesh offers maximum flexibility.
The Flywire system offered a snug, stable fit. At first, I did tighten the laces too tight. Due to the unstability of the mesh material combined with a tight Flywire fit, my feet felt constricted and unable to breathe. The forefoot felt specifically tight and uncomfortable during a long run.
Nike Lunarglide+ 4 Sole Unit:
The Sole Unit is a complex dual density “Lunarlon” midsole construction made of a combination of carbon rubber and midsole foam. Instead of the traditional medial post in this stablity shoe, Nike offers the Dynamic Support System in the midsole. The DSS is made with a lightweight material called LunarLite foam. The foam is cut at an angle in a “wedge like” shape to fit into the midsole cavity. The LunarLite foam is built into the Lunarlon outsole. This provides more support on heel impact, stability, and faster responsiveness on energy return.
The firm foam support cushions the impact, while helping reduce the inward rolling motion of a low arch runner during their footstrike. Whereas neutral runners’ feet would not roll upon footstrike, an overpronator needs the correction so that the foot does not hit inwards or roll. The resilient Lunarlon foundation stabilizes the foot while giving a fast energy shift return. The sole unit produces a springy feel, but lacks the plushness of other stability models such as the Brooks Trance 11’s “Catepillar Crash Pad” cushioning.
Nike Lunarglide+4 Opinion:
They feel great walking around or running short distances. However, they didn’t give me the support I needed during long runs (8 miles or more). When tying the laces too tight, the Flywire support system based in the midfoot made my feet feel constricted and confined.
I recommend these shoes to neutral runners or those with mild pronation control needs. The LunarGlide+ 4 is a lightweight, cushioned and breathable running shoe with a sleek design. I was complemented several times during my runs over the cool look.
It’s a great update to the Lunar Glide+ 3, and has more support than the Nike Pegasus model. Although it didn’t work for long distance runs, as I need a stronger stability shoe, I loved the ventilation during warmer climate exercise and support for shorter runs.
We thank the nice people at Nike for sending us a pair of Lunarglide 4 to test. This did not influence the outcome of the review, written after running more than 50 miles in them.
price comparison
 | Men's Nike Lunarglide+ 4 Running Shoe - Navy/red 10 RoadRunnerSports Free shipping, 60-day perfect fit guarantee: possible to exchange shoes after using them for two months. | $94.95 |
 | Nike - Lunarglide+ 4 (wolf Grey/pink Force/pearl Pink/anthracite) - Footwear Zappos Free shipping both ways (free return shipping), 365 days returns | $110.00 |
 | Nike Lunarglide+ 4 Shield Id Custom Men's Running Shoes - Black, 12 Nike Nike official store. Free shipping on all orders over 100$. | $145.00 |
Written by Ashley Massis
Ashley Massis lives in New York City and works as a Buyer in the Fashion Industry. Although an active athlete through high school and college, she re-discovered her passion for running only a few years ago. She continues to be an active runner and has over 7 years of experience in the fashion and sports industry.
You’re dead-on about it being a neutral shoe. I’m a neutral runner and I barely notice the support – and I usually can’t stand a support shoe. It’s a very good shoe that is listed in the wrong category, IMO. The flywire lacing system should be on every shoe Nike makes.
I agree wholeheartedly on both points, this is more suited to neutral runners than over pronators, but it will have enough stability for shorter runs. Also, you’re dead on about flywire and the way it’s handled here. This tech, unlike many ‘revolutionary’ ones we see from time to time, is no marketing gimmick, it is something that you have to feel it to believe it.
Now, they’ve built a Flyknit (feather light, knitted) upper with this exact same flywire configuration and a platform that is pretty similar to the LunarGlide’s (but even more neutral) and released it as Flyknit Lunar+ 1. So far, it’s my dream shoe come true and on my every wish list. Can’t wait to read you guys review it.
I overpronate and it works for me? It is designed for people ranging from mild underpronation to mild overpronation.
How the support compared to the 3, where for me was too much (I’m neutral). I could feel it like a wedgde on my ankles
I hope I can get some help on this matter.
I’ve been checking my shoes lately (because I started to take running as a serious part of my life) and when I checked an old pair it shows me that I’m a supinator/under-pronator but I have a medium/regular arch so I’m not 100% percent sure of what kind of shoe I should get because every site I check it says that supinators/under-pronators should get neutral shoes but it salo says that this is common in high arch feet which is not my case.
I’m currently using a pair of Nike Lunarglide+ 3 which is a stability shoe as you may know but also made basically for pronators.
What do you recommend me? should I get a neutral shoes? (in that case I’m thinking of getting a pair of the new Nike Pegasus 29) or should I keep using the Lunarglide (in this case thinking of getting the new Nike Lunarglide 4)
And one final question is about the size, I usually wear 8.5 (US size) on almost every Nike shoe of any kind, the Pegasus sticks to this or should I get extra half size is case of buying them.
Any extra suggestions are more than welcome.
Thanks.
Joseph – the question is… what’s your current feeling in the LunarGlide 3?
It’s a great shoe for underpronating flat feet like mine, love it’s light weight and fit. In fact I find the design of this shoe derived from a simple but effective concept !
Has worked for me and find it better than my earlier buys like Nike Pegasus and brooks Dyad .
Keep up the innovation Nike !
Can you tell me how the cushioning in the forefoot are? The older Pegasus were great for me. Tried the new ones and hate them. Tried the vomeros. Hate them too. It is like Nike has removed any cushioning in the forefoot in their recent models. Any suggestions? Thanks for the review!
That’s true , I feel lunar glide 4 are more suitable for heel and mid foot strikers.
Fore foot Cushioning is lesser than older Pegasus.
Harsh
I’m a neutral runner and find the LunarGlides to be one of the best runners for myself. I’ve tried New Balance and various others and none come close to giving a pain free run like these, both short and distance.
Sucks. Heel is rock hard drop from front to back must be o. This shoe initiates one to heel strike . Lace system is nice. The rest ,,you can have it. Not soft,not supportive,junk.
Hi,
I just wanted to ask – what exactly is the difference between LunarGlide 4 and LunarGlide 4 plus? I’ve been trying to google the difference but didn’t manage to find anything exact, from what I read it seems that they’re the same shoe?
I’m on the hunt for a pair of new running shoes and I’ve decided on LungarGlide but still don’t know whether to get LunarGlide 4 or LunarGlide 4 plus.
Thanks a lot!
Daniela
Hi there. There is no difference. “+” is what Nike calls all of their shoes that include the space for the sensor.
When a shoe is called “lunarglide 4″ is exactly the same shoe as the “lunarglide+ 4″.
…and both are the same as a LunarGlide 4 Shield (or 4 Sh).
The shield model’s only difference being that it’s coated with a reflective ink that makes the upper behave as if it’s a reflective strip (shines brightly when light hits it in dark surroundings). Great for night running.
Oh, and the shield coating makes it water repellant so it’s also better for rainy/wet conditions at the price of making them duller regarding color selection.
Hi, I know nothing about running shoes, but which pair should I choose between this pair, the Pegasus 29, and the Free Run +3? I’m 5’11 and 150 lbs with low archs.
Two totally different shoes. I’d buy both. I have both and i’m an overpronator. The frees are designed as “training” shoes that help you to achieve stronger feet and legs while the lunarglide would be your everyday cushioned shoe for a soft and comfortable run. As quoted by a nike rep, “the frees are the gym for your feet!”.
apologies…the pegasus!!
This is one of the sharpest, flyest looking shoes I have ever run in! Trouble is, after only three runs of 6 miles each, it’s giving me inner ankle problems on both sides.
I have worn the Lunarglide 3 for over a year (three different pair, 2 marathons) with nary a problem, so when the ankle pain started I knew something was horribly wrong with this shoe.
Whatever they have done to the design, it is screwed up. I am now left to scramble and find as many pair of the LG 3′s while they are still available as the running season is upon us and I simply have no time to try another model/brand of shoe because the LG 3 is tried and true for me.
It’s a shame, the LG 4 is gorgeous, but good looks will not get me to the finish line. A sound, safe, practical design (such as the LG 3) will.
How does it compare to the Nike Air Pegasus+ 29? I’m trying to find a replacement for the Nike Air Max Moto+ since they were sadly discontinued. I am debating between this show, and the pegasus.
That’s supposed to say shoe, not show. Sorry, hard to type with a cast on.
I am a overpronater myself as well.
I’m looking for a lightweight , stable and breathable sneaker for my everyday wear and occasion runs. Would these be a perfect fit for me ? Since the Flyknits came out, I noticed that the price started dropping.
I’m currently using the brooks adrenaline , they’re by far my favorite sneaker of all time but I’m not looking to spend over $100 + for a pair of sneakers I’m going to beat up in!
Any other suggestions would be good too! Thanks in advance.
How are these against the new LunarEclipse 3+?
The other thread mentioned about stability, structure and flex.
All I could discern when i saw it was:
1) LE3+ was heavier
2) LE3+ has a better insole, structure and layered cushioning
3) LE3+ uses asymmetrical lacing to give a ‘more’ snug fit
4) LE3+ has a thicker outsole, hence a possible longer lifespan.
What is your take on the over feel of the shoe VS the LG4?
Cheers.