In my recent Wave Nirvana 8 and Wave Inspire 8 reviews my biggest gripe was the look of the shoes. It’s a small thing to complain about, I know. Mizuno may be a bit conservative when it comes to the standard colors for the Inspire and Nirvana series but they unleashed the designers for the Wave Elixir 7. What they came up with, visually speaking, is as striking a shoe as I’ve ever seen. Road hazard orange, lime green, silver and black all topped off with a tiger striped mesh! My first real test of the Wave Elixir 7 was at a local 15K. I knew that this test was gonna hurt. The good kind of hurt.

Mizuno Wave Elixir 7 Upper:

Mizuno redesigned the entire blueprint of the Wave Elixir 7. Everything here is a fresh take and the upper aesthetic is absolutely insane. Mizuno still uses a lightweight, highly breathable mesh but this time it is sublimated with an animal style print straight out of 1987. The overlays are now made from a lighter, more flexible material and are strategically placed to better form the shoe around the arch and heel while leaving the toe box a bit freer.

The Dynamotion lateral lace tab is removed and the heel collar has been lowered. The Wave Elixir 7 gets some updated shoestrings as well. The new laces are rendered in lime green and black and sport a lighter but stiffer feel from the laces in the Wave Elixir 6. Also, for the first time, the Wave Elixir 7 gets a cushy Ortholite sock liner which replaces the older style AP foam sock liner.

Mizuno Wave Elixir 7 Midsole:

Not to be outdone by the upper, the Wave Elixir 7 midsole has been refined to deliver the performance to match the attitude of the upper. All Mizuno running shoes are designed around the Mizuno Wave Plate. This unique construction situates a plastic plate in the midsole of the shoe and can be tuned to match different runners needs.

The Wave Elixir 7 plate moves the arch a bit farther back towards the heel than in previous editions and this results in a slight increase in stability while still allowing enough inward roll to provide a quick transition from strike to toe off. For the first time, Mizuno has introduced their Flex Controller technology to the Elixir series.

Flex Controllers are placed at the forefoot flex point and, according to Mizuno, provide for the optimal degree of forefoot flexion. Mizuno’s G3 wet traction outsole is still in place in the medial forefoot area of the Wave Elixir 7. X10 carbon rubber still ensures durability in the heel and Mizuno’s AP+ midsole formulation provides the bounce.

Mizuno Wave Elixir 7 opinion:

Years ago I was fitted for a Mizuno Wave Maverick as my first true running shoe. The Maverick has since morphed into the Elixir series and I always have at least one pair on hand. As my mileage increased I eventually moved on up to the Nirvana series but I have always had a soft spot for the Elixir. It doesn’t hurt that the Elixir is always ready to run fast either.

The Wave Elixir 7 is certainly no disappointment in either the looks or performance category. I ran the Elixir once on a treadmill and then took it to a 15K. I ran a new personal best that day and finished pretty well against some of the strongest runners in my town. The shoe never gave me any problems at that race or in any subsequent runs.

The arch is solid and the transition is classic Mizuno; fast and with no loss of power through foot strike. It’s an ideal shoe for those of us who need support but also desire a lighter, faster shoe we can take to a race. I even know a neutral footed runner who uses it as her daily trainer.

However, I have noticed that the Wave Elixir 7 fit is slightly narrower than before and the toe box is not quite as wide. I had no issues with this but do be aware if you have a higher volume foot.

Mizuno has brought the heat with this shoe, literally. The Wave Elixir 7 stands ready to eat asphalt and will relentlessly beg you to up the pace. Pain, sweet pain.

We thank the nice people at Mizuno for sending us a pair of Elixir 7 to test. This did not influence our review of the shoe, written after logging a very decent amount of miles in them!

Nike’s design team utilized their Portland based pro runners from Alberto Salazar’s training group, including Mo Farah and Galen Rupp, to develop a shoe that picked up where the Zoom Elite 4 left off.  The Zoom Elite 5 is not just a faithful reproduction of a popular shoe, but a lighter and slightly lower update that is sure to please Zoom Elite 4 runners and then some.

Nike Zoom Elite 5 First Impressions

I have to admit I was skeptical.  When I first learned that I would be testing and reviewing the update to one of my all time favorite shoes I anticipated the Lunar Elite series with some Zoom Air thrown in.  When I first saw the shoes I even thought to myself there is no way that these will hold a candle to my old Elites.  I slipped them on and things felt promising, even familiar.  The fit and last felt the same, and that old familiar arch support hugged my feet in all the right places.  While I don’t really like the canary yellow color that made my me feel like I was wearing tennis balls on my feet, these shoes looked and performed like workhorses.  No bells, no whistles, just function.

Nike Zoom Elite 5 Upper

The Zoom Elite 5 features a durable dual density mesh upper with well placed underlays throughout the mid foot section of the foot which provides a nice snug fit.  The mid foot section of the upper features a nylon mono mesh over the underlays  which increases breath-ability and synthetic leather material is used as a webbing over the mono mesh to make this a pretty tough upper.  Throughout the toe box area of the upper welded overlays are used which are completely seamless and The fit is very similar to the Zoom Elite 4, but I find the 5 to fit even better.  A wide toe box gives way to a mid foot section that hugs the foot well due to the underlays being incorporated into the lacing system.  Oval laces compliment a simple, yet effective, lacing system which never placed undue stress on the tops of my feet.

One complaint that I had about the Elite 4 was how snug the shoe was throughout the mid foot.  The Zoom Elite 5 underlays do allow the wearer to tighten the upper to their liking but it never feels too tight or constricting.  Nike steered clear of using any plastic logos or reinforcements throughout the upper which allows it to be pliable and lightweight.  I found the upper breathable enough for running in warmer weather (70 + degrees) but I also didn’t have any issues wearing this shoe in temps below 20 degrees without heavy socks.  I also noticed absolutely no wear throughout the upper after close to 200 miles in them.

Nike Zoom Elite 5 Midsole

I mentioned that the Zoom Elite 5 is a bit lower than it’s predecessor, and while I don’t have exact stack height specs from Nike, I will say that this lower stack height adds a bit of stability and sure-footedness the ride.  Nike also lowered the heel drop from the previous version ever so slightly to 9mm (2omm heel – 11mm toe) in the midsole which gives the shoe a great transition through the gait cycle.

Rather than using Lunar foam as Nike used in the Lunar Elite, Nike kept the Phylon midsole foam from the Elite 4 in the new incarnation to preserve the firm responsive feel of the series.  The feel is fantastic, especially throughout the arch area of the foot which is very supportive.  Rather than achieving this through dual density foam or some sort of plastic device, the Phylon foam is shaped in a way throughout the arch foot bed that supports the runner.

Zoom air is present in the forefoot of the midsole which provides snappy and responsive cushioning for faster paced running.  For those unfamiliar with Zoom Air, Nike describes it as:

Zoom Air cushioning comes in a flat, thin unit that provides low-profile, super-responsive cushioning for top speeds and fast “off-the-mark” movements.

Nike Zoom Elite 5 Outsole

A very simple waffle outsole made of durable carbon rubber is used throughout to provide great long lasting traction.  Nike did not create awkward cutouts throughout the outsole of the shoe, and I’m happy to report that this shoe does not collect rocks.

Nike Zoom Elite 5 Overall Impressions

Nike has accurately recreated the best parts of the very popular Zoom Elite Series and improved the shoe where it was needed.  Simply put, Nike has created an absolute winner in the Zoom Elite 5.  This is the type of shoe that I could put on any runner, whether they underpronate, supinate, or are neutral, and they’ll be impressed with the feel and ride of the shoe.  The upper  is flexible, seamless, and the fit will accommodate many types of feet.  The combination of Phylon foam and Zoom Air in the forefoot offers a plush, flexible, and fast ride.

At 10.7 oz (men’s size 10) with a 9mm heel drop the Zoom Elite 5 bridges the gap between lightweight trainers and a well cushioned shoe runners would use for easy days or long runs.  This shoe can do it all:  During long runs my feet felt supported even when my form fell apart from fatigue.  Faster tempo running was a pleasure due to the Zoom Air in the forefoot, and the cushioning hasn’t lost any responsiveness in 200 miles.

If you were a fan of the Zoom Elite 4s then these shoes are  a must buy.  For anyone else, you don’t know what you’re missing!

we thank the nice people at Nike for sending us a pair of Zoom Elite 5 to test. This did not influence our review of the shoe, written after logging more than 200 miles on them!

When I first opened the Brooks box, I noticed the striking design. I tested the yellow and grey color way. The color combination was eye catching, and the overlay mesh had an interesting decorative pattern. I liked the branding design, which has the shoe name located along the lacing system and the Brooks name down its heel.

Brooks Trance 11 Upper:

Brooks Tongue Tied lacing system reduces the sliding of the Trance’s tongue. The upper materials are extremely comfortable. Its open mesh overlay provides breathability and maximum moisture management. The microfiber construction offers durability and comfort in a light fabric. The toe box is wide and gives a generous fit. Its Blown Rubber Forefoot is soft and durable for all weather climates. The environmentally friendly BioMogo sock liner offers additional comfort.

Brooks Trance 11 Sole Unit:

Overpronation occurs when a runner’s stride hits the ground on the lateral side of the heel. The foot strike does not absorb shock efficiently, which results in uneven distribution of weight. This causes the individual’s arches to collapse, or a weakening of the ankles.

The Trance 11 is a luxurious ride and offers top of the line technology to correct overpronation.

Brooks’ patented Caterpillar Crash Pad is one of the featured technologies. The perimeter of the sole is lined with the Crash Pad to provide a smooth ride and maximum flexibility. This allows an efficient stride, and a smooth heel lay down. In other words, it shifts energy from heel to toe and guides the foot towards a more normal and fluid stride.

Brooks patented DNA Technology is full length to offer a more customized ride. Its gel cushioning is made up of non-Newtonian liquid, and responds to the amount of force placed on the foot by providing custom support. Brooks’ DNA also offers twice the normal energy return. The faster you run, the harder the liquid becomes. The tuned density midsole technology adapts to the runner’s weight; providing additional custom cushioning. Additionally, the midsoles are engineered to allow pronation control and stability through its Progressive Diagonal Rollbar.

Brooks Trance 11 Opinion:

Two of Brooks’ bestselling stability shoes are the Adrenaline GTS 12 and the Trance 11. While both are great stability options, what are the main differences between the two?

The materials in the upper of the Trance offer maximum cushion and are softer, which adds to the higher cost. The Adrenaline GTS 12 provided a snugger, more conforming fit. The Trances were plusher and offered maximum comfort. Unlike the Adrenaline GTS 12 model which offers DNA filled pods, the Trance 11 model offers full length DNA cushioning.

The Adrenaline GTS 12 offers adjustable elastic lacing that provides a secure and its signature “midfoot wrap” fit while the Trance 11 Toe Box is wider and offers a roomier fit. In addition, the arch support in the Trance 11 model is lower. Both offer great support, but I preferred the custom fit of the Adrenalines. Coming from someone with flat fleet, the arch support in the Trance 11 was lower than my personal preference .

Asics GEL Kayano 18 First Impressions

If Asics plays it safe with the GT series, then the Kayano series is where they roll the dice. It seems like this shoe gets a major change nearly every year. Off set lacing, giant GEL heel packs, Heel Clutching System, oh my! My test pair arrived in a stunningly sinister silver and black color way. I couldn’t wait to run in them.

Asics GEL Kayano 18 Upper

Theo Comfort was order of the day when Asics built the GEL Kayano 18. All materials found in the GEL Kayano 18 upper are high end. Asics uses very breathable and noticeably soft mesh combined with premium overlay material to provide runners with a truly luxurious upper fit.

The GEL Kayano 18 gets Asics Biomorphic fit materials in the arch and forefoot flex points. This material will not bunch, pinch or grab a runners foot and is only found on Asics top shelf shoes. The lacing pattern is still slightly offset but not to the degree found in earlier versions of the shoe.

Asics has decided to remove the internal heel counter and replace it with an external “exoskeleton” design. As a result, the shoe feels like it has almost no heel counter at all. Inside the heel pocket we find Asics PHF (Personalized Heel Fit) memory foam. Initially, I felt some slippage in the GEL Kayano 18 heel, probably because Asics uses a very slippery heel collar lining that slides when you wear technical socks. At any rate, the slipping feeling didn’t last long.

Ruggero I think “luxury” is a good way to describe the feeling of the Kayano 18 upper. Just picking the shoe up in your hands you can feel the smoothness and softness of the memory foam used in the tongue and the heel collar. The shoe fits great: I didn’t have any problem with the heel slippage and I couldn’t feel any pinch or itch at any point. The upper unit of the Kayano is truly amazing.

I have very flat feet and I felt very comfortable in the Kayano’s upper. I also want to say that my pair came in the white/orange colour in the pictures and I prefer it to the dark colour that Theo run in

Asics GEL Kayano 18 Sole Unit

Theo Asics has implemented a new type of midsole posting called Dynamic Duomax which Asics claims responds better to the needs of the runner. For the first time ever, Duomax Soft Top is in place in both men’s and women’s versions of the shoe. Duomax Soft Top enhances the cushioning properties of the GEL Kayano 18. Asics uses its legendary GEL cushioning system in heel and forefoot areas of the GEL Kayano 18 to provide the plushest running experience ever in the GEL Kayano franchise.

Asics Space Trusstic System shores up the mid foot of the shoe and works to relieve some of the torsional forces that running places on a shoe’s midsole. Lastly, Asics has also included a Guidance Line design which carves a channel on the sole of the shoe to help guide the foot through initial contact to toe off.

Ruggero I was also surprised of the amount of plush cushioning delivered by the Kayano, especially in the forefoot – which is a good thing if like me you tend to land on your midfoot. I was expecting a little more support, though.

Asics GEL Kayano 18 Opinion

Theo The GEL Kayano 18 is certainly a premium shoe but after a couple of runs I knew that it was not for me. Not only that, but I feel that the GEL Kayano 18 is completely miscategorized. To me, the shoe feels a whole lot closer to a neutral shoe than a shoe designed for moderate over pronators. When running in the GEL Kayano 18, my feet literally felt as though they were diving inwards with very little to help slow my pronation. For the record, I’m six feet tall and 160 pounds on a heavy day. The GEL Kayano 18 simply could not keep up with what my feet need from a shoe.

However, The GEL Kayano 18 looks incredible in the silver and black color way I received and it is extremely comfortable and well cushioned. It transitioned reasonably well for a shoe with so much shock absorption.

Kayano series fans will likely be split over the direction the shoe has taken. More neutral runners could very well love it while those of us who need more help from our shoes will be forced to look elsewhere.

In fact, I recently tested the Asics GT 2170 and found it to be much more stable and provide considerably more arch support than found in the GEL Kayano 18. As such, I’m recommending this latest Kayano to neutral to mildly over pronating runners who are looking for a long run shoe with the slightest touch of support.

Ruggero I am a heavier runner than Theo (85kg -> 185 pounds) and while I did feel the support of the Kayano 18, I need to agree that is indeed less than what I was expecting to find. I didn’t find my arches collapsing too much, but what I felt was the super-soft cushioning. After a couple of 7/8km runs and two 12km runs I didn’t feel any ankle pain – which usually means that I overpronated a lot during my run – so there is definitely support, but landing on so much cushion makes the foot a little unstable, or at least it feels like it.

All in all the Kayano is a great shoe and I also would reccomend it to larger runners that are looking for a high-mileage (marathon training) shoe that offers soft soft cushioning and a touch of overpronating control.

The new Wave Nirvana 8 has received a new and more minimal upper design in a striking blue, silver and orange color combination. The removal of several overlays is immediately noticeable but the midsole, despite being color matched to the overlays, is identical to that of the Wave Nirvana 7. As expected, the Wave Nirvana 8 feels very protective when on the foot.

Mizuno Wave Nirvana 8 Upper:

The sole focal point of the Wave Nirvana 8 is on its upper. Mizuno seems to have looked in the back catalogue when designing the upper for the Wave Nirvana 8. The new upper is reminiscent of that found in the original Wave Nirvana. Mizuno lowered the heel collar and removed the Dynamotion Fit lateral lacing tab found on the Wave Nirvana 7. The flex eyelets from the previous edition are removed in favor of a more traditional looking eyelet row. The Wave Nirvana 8 also employs a less complex series of overlays designed to reduce weight and improve fit.

Mizuno Wave Nirvana 8 Sole Unit:

As stated earlier, the midsole on the Wave Nirvana 8 is carried over from the Wave Nirvana 7. As such, it is still built around Mizuno’s full length stability wave plate. Mizuno utilizes these plastic wave plates as a literal ‘suspension system’ to provide shock attenuation and stability to their shoes. The Wave Nirvana 8 wave plate is tuned to deliver premium stability for an over pronating runner. Over pronation occurs when a runner’s foot lands and rolls too far to the inside, placing extreme stress on the arch and inner shin musculature. In the Wave Nirvana 8 the wave plate travels nearly the full length of the shoe in order to provide stability from contact through toe off.

Still present in the Wave Nirvana 8 sole are Mizuno flex controllers. According to Mizuno testing, flex controllers help provide the ideal amount of forefoot flexibility to aid in improving transition to toe off while allowing for less midsole foam at the forefoot flex point. This design feature aims to accomplish weight reduction while maintaining a flexible, yet stable ride. Other carryover features include Mizuno’s classic VS-1 heel cushioning wedge , premium AP+ midsole foam and an Ortholite sock liner.

Mizuno Wave Nirvana 8 Opinion:

I have relied on the Nirvana series to be my workhorse for 8 years now. No other shoe has consistently delivered the stability of the Nirvana. Although I only weigh 160 pounds at six feet tall, I have very flexible arches which demand additional help from my shoes. And I don’t like adding orthotics to my shoes. I believe that a $100-$150 shoe should be enough. Mizuno delivers by placing the arch support near the heel in their shoes and this is, for me, the ideal way to engineer a shoe.

In regards to the new upper, I have mixed emotions. I’m not a fan of the color combination on this Nirvana. It’s just too…blue. However, it definitely provides a better fit than the previous model and is responsible for the slight weight reduction from the Wave Nirvana 7. The new upper sits much lower on the foot and I had to be careful not to over tighten the laces. Although the previous Dynamotion Fit lacing tab bothered some, it never gave me any problems. I can say that the lateral aspect of the collar is definitely lower than before. Either way, the shoe fits better than before and sports the same stable ride as the Wave Nirvana 7. In fact, I have not tested a shoe that combines this amount of stability with flexibility and cushioning.

Only recently has another shoe threatened to take away the number one spot that the Nirvana has maintained in my shoe rotation. Unsurprisingly, the challenger was the Mizuno Wave Inspire 8 which I reviewed earlier. After many runs in both shoes I must say that as good of a shoe as the new Wave Inspire 8 is, it just cannot deliver the long haul stability of the Wave Nirvana 8. Such is the strength of the Nirvana series, dear readers!

We thank the nice people at Mizuno for sending us a pair of Nirvana 8 to test. This did not influence the review, written after logging more than 50 miles in the shoes!

The Brooks Pure Project line, which hit stores this fall, was Brooks’ response to runners’ requests for more minimal shoes. The Pure Project line consists of four minimal shoes—the Pure Cadence, the Pure Connect, Pure Flow, and Pure Grit—each aimed at a different type of runner. The Pure Cadence is the stability shoe of the group, designed to allow overpronators to experience a minimal shoe. Key features include a supportive upper, a thick pod on the outer edge of the sole unit, as well as internal support in the sole unit to add additional stability.

Brooks Pure Cadence Impressions

Having heard quite a bit about the Pure Project line in the weeks leading up to their release, I was excited to try the Pure Cadence. From the first run, a short three-mile tempo through my neighborhood, I loved their snug fit and the smooth ride. Between the flexible sole and the lighter weight, they made for a great option for speed or track days, though I wouldn’t recommend them for trails. Having tried other minimal shoes, I was expecting a bit of soreness in my legs the next day, but didn’t have any issues the next day. Despite a lack of soreness, I would recommend easing into these shoes, as the overall experience is different from most other running shoes.

One of the advantages of minimal shoes that many runners focus on is the encouragement of a midfoot strike. As an injury-prone runner, I’ve been working toward improving my gait and footstrike, and I did feel a difference when running in the Pure Cadence. Post-marathon, I had noticed that my gait had slipped a bit, and I was going back to my old heel-striking ways. With regular runs in the Pure Cadence, I have found that even in my everyday trainers, my gait has improved considerably. Overall, I’ve enjoyed running in the Pure Cadence, and they’ll stay in my rotation for speed work and the occasional race.

Brooks Pure Cadence Sole Unit

The sole unit features two special elements to provide adequate stability for overpronators. The first and most immediately noticeable element is a small pod, located on the outside of the middle part of the sole, and is meant to prevent the foot from rolling inward and stressing the ankle. While I was concerned that it would feel awkward when I first looked at the shoes, I didn’t feel it on the run. The other main support feature in the sole unit is an internal bar running through the shoe diagonally. Like the pod, I didn’t find this element to be obtrusive while running.

All Pure Project shoes have two other distinctive features: a split in the toe box, called the Toe Flex, and a smooth inverted heel, which Brooks has named the Ideal Heel. The Toe Flex, located near the big toe, is meant to allow the big toe to work independently to encourage runners to use their own balance, rather than letting the shoe do the work for them. The second feature, which is one of my favorite parts about the Pure Cadence, is the Ideal Heel. The Ideal Heel is a smooth inverted heel, which is meant to encourage a midfoot strike.

Brooks Pure Cadence Upper Unit

The main feature of the upper unit on the Pure Cadence is the NavBand, a thick elastic band running across the midfoot. Meant to secure the foot in place and help the shoe conform to the runner’s foot, the NavBand is a nice addition, and adds to the overall snug and secure fit of the shoe. Overall, the upper’s construction is relatively simple and smooth, constructed mostly of lightweight mesh and nylon. One final touch to the shoe was the bubbled laces, which helps keep laces tied. While the upper doesn’t hold up well in rainy conditions—my feet were wet pretty quickly—it would be great for running in the heat. Another advantage to the upper is the smooth interior, great for blister-prone runners.

Brooks Pure Cadence Opinion

The Pure Cadence would be a great option for light overpronating runners looking to try more minimal shoes, though they probably wouldn’t be a great for serious overpronators that normally require heavy support. The with a light, fast, and smooth feel, the Pure Cadence makes for a great experience, and would be a great option for speed work or race day.

When I first took the Adrenalines out of the box, I immediately noticed the upper design of the new model. The silver mesh overlay with white and colored details were classic to the model, but freshly updated. The synthetic leather overlays are designed with reflective accents that run from the heel to the toe. Brooks’ DNA formula provides adaptive cushioning giving a smooth and even run. Immediately after putting on the shoe I noticed the “wrap around” cushioning. The medial post, colored in grey along the arch area allows maximum stability and gait balance.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 12 Sole Unit

The sole unit of the GTS 12 is very similar to the one in the GTS 11. The stability and cushioning elements remained the same, with the biggest change to be found in the heel pad.

For the stability elements, the sole unit of the GTS 12 relies on two main components. The big, grey coloured insert of a harder foam compound on the medial (internal) side of the shoe is called Progressive Diagonal Roll Bar (PDRB) and it’s a traditional medial post, but with varying in hardness from soft to hard going from the heel towards the arch. The result? Different stability for different runners. Brooks calls this “pivot posting”.

Second element of stability is the plastic shank right below the arch (DRB Accel in Brooks’ terms).

Cushioning is provided by two units (one in the heel and one in the forefoot) of DNA. DNA is high-viscosity, non-newtonian fluid that is soft when the speed is low, but gets firmer when the pace gets faster. When you go slow you are longer in contact with the ground and want/need a softer landing, but when you go fast you want the sole to be harder in order to propel you forward. When walking or running at a slow speed, I noticed the DNA pods conform to the ground and remain soft. As my pace quickened, the DNA became firm, as intended, to guarantee faster energy return and providing a smooth run.

The main change versus the previous model is a better “landing crash pad”: the heel area is split in many different pods that compress differently according to the runner’s individual gait.

Although the sole unit is cushioned, it is very supportive. After running a few miles to break in the shoe, I was surprised to feel that lack of needing to “break in” the shoe.

The additional heel cushioning added maximum comfort and a firm back. It’s easily detectable as it matches the Brooks side logo on each shoe.

Its stacked foam Bio MoGo provides additional stability and reduces foot fatigue; perfect for low to mid arch runners and added custom fit. Additionally, Brooks boasts the foam core is biodegradable; an additional bonus to help Mother Nature.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 12 Upper

The upper unit is very flexible and breathable due to the top mesh overlay. The mesh and interior polyester and nylon lining provide strong moisture management. With four newly added adjustable straps, the elasticity ensures a snug and secure fit.

The synthetic leather overlay adds additional structure along the top and sides of the shoe. Additionally, Brooks has designed a new lace tab, Tongue Tied, which keeps the tongue up while running. Although initially weary of the new Tongue Tied technology, I was surprised that the tongue not only stayed up during my run, but provided a more snug fit.

Overall the upper keeps the traditional look and feel of the Adrenaline, but improves in the sense that is lighter and more comfortable: the lacing system is more adaptive of the shape of the foot and locks the foot closer to the midsole, adding stability. The shoe fit is very similar to the Adrenaline 10 and 11.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 12 Opinion

I have been running in the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 10 model for the past year. I expected the shoe to be comfortable and durable, but to feel very similar to the GTS 10. It was surprising to immediately feel the differences between the two models. Not being the lightest of the shoes, the weight reduction comes as a very welcome news.

The added heel cradle gives extra cushion in the back, which keeps the shoe firm but at maximum comfort. There is a reason I am loyal to this model, and Brooks keeps showing me why through its continued ensured quality.

After running a half marathon in the shoes, as well as having logged over 60 miles in training, my feet still had breathability and were comfortable.

We thank the nice people at Brooks for sending us a pair of Adrenaline GTS 12 to test. This did not influence our review of the shoes, written after running more than 60 miles (and a half marathon) in them.

I am a 6.2″ / 185 pounds runner with extremely flat feet. I have run in the Structure Triax as my main mileage shoe since since version 13. I was extremely pleased when I found out that the sole unit of the Triax 15 remained the same as in the previous two versions as it had worked fantastic for me in the past two years.

The version I bought (yes, no free pair for this one!) is the SHIELD. Shield is Nike’s name for their winter version of their shoes: compared to the standard ones you get water repellent materials, warmer linings and more highly reflective overlays on the uppers. Since it’s 0C degrees here at the moment on my morning runs, it rains almost constantly and it’s pitch black – and it’s not going to get any better until spring – I think the SHIELD upper was a worthy investment (10$ more than the normal version).

Nike Structure Triax+ 15 Sole Unit

The sole unit of the Triax 15 is the same as it was on the 14, which was the same as it was on the 13 (one of the pictures shows the comparison between the outsole of the 13 and 15).

The main stability features are the medial post, the engineered heel and the plastic shank.

Overpronation is avoided starting at the heel: the outside area of the heel is softer, encouraging the foot to push the weight on the outside first, delaying the overpronation (which is the excessive inward roll of the foot during the gait).

Nike Zoom Structure Triax 15 -Decoupled Heel Detail

Once the weight is placed under the arch, the medial post – the grey insert of a harder foam compound stops the arch from collapsing too much.

Nike Zoom Structure Triax 15 - Medial Post Detail

The third element of stability is the plastic shank that is placed right under the arch and keeps the sole stiff in that area, preventing it from twisting unnaturally and avoiding sprinked ankles.

None of these solutions is revolutionary. The Structure Triax has used it for years and they are all pretty much industry standards, but they just plain work well together in the Triax 15.

The forefoot is quite flexible (and still cushioned) thanks to the deeply carved flex grooves. Nike’s BRS-1000 rubber provides good grip even over wet concrete and it’s extremely durable: I have logged way more than 500 km on my Triax 13s and the rubber is mostly all still there as you can see from one of the pictures!

Nike Structure Triax+ 15 Upper Unit

The upper of the Triax 15 is comfortable and stable. A Hard heel counter keeps the heel in position, the midfoot is securely locked and the toebox is roomy without being too large. Flywire (a lighter overlay material) lock the foot in position going from the last two eyelets all the way down to the sole unit and across the heel.

There is a FITSOLE sockliner inside that provides some extra cushioning and has a quite low-shaped arch, ideal for medium to flat arches.

I am running with the SHIELD upper. Shield is the version with water repellent materials, warm lining and highly reflective areas on the upper. This version costs 10$ more than the standard… but at 110$ total price it’s well worth the upgrade – especially if you plan to run during the winter months.

The upper is almost seamless, soft and sock-like. I love that my shoes can get wet while running under the rain but my feet still stay warm after more than one hour in the elements.

Nike Structure Triax+ 15 Opinion

It is difficult for me to write a review of the Triax 15 that doesn’t sound like a love letter. There are many shoes I like to wear (ie the Asics DS Trainer) but when I just want to go for a long run and feel confident my feet won’t kill me later, the Triax is my shoe of choice. Like the Pegasus, it is one of those shoes that is almost impossible to go wrong with.

The only thing that changed in this update is the upper – and the SHIELD version makes it so nice to run in the winter.

I highly reccomend this shoe for runners with flat feet, as its low arch will fit great. If you have medium to high arches, the other two shoes that I would consider would be the Asics GT-2170 (high-mileage, soft and protective) or the Mizuno Wave Inspire 8 (for faster but still well protected runs).

What’s old is new again with the Asics GT 2170. Being that the 2170 is a core shoe for Asics, I didn’t expect a drastic overhaul for the 2170 and I was pretty much right. The heel looks a little different on the 2170 and it is truly a pleasant shoe when you first try it on. The 2150 was the last GT series shoe that I ran in and it too was a fine shoe. The 2170 continues to offer high end cushioning and moderate stability combined with a fit and function that thousands of runners call home.

Asics GT 2170 Upper:

Asics continues to play it safe with the 2170 upper. And why not? It’s a well designed unit consisting of very breathable mesh and supportive, yet soft, overlays. I did notice that the eyelet row has been segmented a bit in order to help the upper conform to the foot in motion. Most notable to me is the Asics PHF (Personalized Heel Fit) design which provides a very plush and comfortable heel fit. The heel counter is quite rigid as it should be in a stability shoe. The collar height is very low and provides a good fit. At first, I felt like I was slipping a touch in the heel area but that sensation soon abated. Asics uses a very slick, finely woven material inside their shoes and when combined with technical socks the heel fit can slide a little for the first couple of runs.

Asics GT 2170 Sole Unit:

As in the upper, Asics has made few sweeping changes to the 2170. GT series fans will still find the same Duomax medial posting, SoLyte midsole foam and Impact Guidance System (IGS). Also included is a substantial Space Trusstic mid foot shank which helps control the torsional forces created by an over pronating foot. Asics relatively new Guidance Line design is also here. Guidance Line carves out a path in the midsole to help the foot travel as neutrally through foot strike as possible. Asics did decide to place more GEL cushioning in the heel area of the 2170. In fact, the GT series has never had this much GEL before.

Asics GT 2170 Opinion:

I truly enjoyed my time in the Asics GT 2170. I took them on both treadmill and asphalt runs and they performed quite reliably and as expected. The GT 2170 has several features that I demand in a stability shoe. First, I must have a shoe with substantial arch support and the 2170 did well in this regard. I’m a light runner but my feet are very flexible and my feet and posterior tibial tendons will quickly tell me if a shoe is weak in the arch. The GT 2170 was adequate in this regard but there were times that I felt a few twinges that tell me I probably would be better off in a shoe with a touch more arch.

The GT 2170 excels at cushioning. The shoe does a superb job of insulating the runner from the road. However, this comes with a trade off in transition. Compared to some other shoes I’ve recently tested, the GT 2170 felt a bit slow and cumbersome when the pace quickened. It is also heavier than many competitors shoes in this category. I weigh every shoe that I test on my kitchen scale and I was surprised to see a 12 ounce weight for this shoe. Overall though, the shoe is well built and the design, even if a little dated, is undeniably successful.

I can’t see any reason why fans of this series will be disappointed in the new GT 2170.

We thank the nice people at Asics for sending us a pair of GT-2170 to test. This did not influence our review, written after running more than 50 miles in them

The Guide 5 is Saucony’s most popular shoe, and for good reason: the model provides a great fit and a comfortable ride at a good price. In its latest iteration, the Guide 5 has shed weight, increased cushioning, and most importantly, shed the heel drop to a slender 8mm.

The end result is a shoe which provides balanced and subtle guidance without hampering a runner’s stride. The shoes stay light and comfortable on long runs, creating a great experience in which the wearer can feel supported while still able to move naturally.

By reducing heel drop, Saucony made their most popular shoe even more fun to run in — adopting a more neutral platform while still supporting the foot. Their efforts created a lighter, more responsive stability shoe.

Saucony Guide 5 Impressions

At the risk sounding hyperbolic, I found the Guide 5 to be a truly fantastic shoe. As many shoe manufacturers are moving to revamp models based solely on trends, Saucony sought subtle improvements to the Guide series in its latest incarnation.

By making the newly-introduced eight-millimeter heel drop the focal point of the redesign, Saucony makes genuine improvements to the Guide that can also bolster better running form for its wearers. By shedding weight, lowering the heel drop, and improving the model’s flexibility, Saucony included major advancements that may not be flashy but make a difference where it counts. These subtle improvements create an experience which is greater than the sum of their parts—providing a fit and feel of a light trainer without losing the guidance and support of a stability shoe.

Overall, the Guide 5 provided excellent support for my long and short runs post-marathon. While it was initially difficult to get back into the running mindset, having the physical support provided by the shoes helped fatigued and sore muscles get limber and active once again.

The supportive ProGrid LITE midsole cushioning and impact zones provided welcome comfort without becoming obtrusive, allowing me to move and adjust my stride without hampering my style or overcorrecting my foot placement. Much of the shoe’s unobtrusive feel could be chalked up to the balanced ride from the reduced heel drop—having a more even surface made my feet feel free to land naturally without any overcorrecting from the shoe.

Another boon to the Guide 5 is the comfortable material found in the sockliner and upper — these elements felt smooth on the skin on top of both cotton and technical socks, and the upper never felt heavy despite being thick enough to stand up against rain debris.

As a small yet telling detail of Saucony’s attention to detail, the Guide 5 features flat shoelaces which I never saw previously, but began to love due to their easiness of use and lack of slippage. From top to bottom, the Guide 5 is a solid shoe that has only improved in its latest incarnation.

Saucony Guide 5 Sole Unit

In keeping with the general aesthetic of the shoe, the Guide 5 has an outsole that provides an excellent, no-frills experience which focuses on providing an excellent grip on the road, track, treadmill, or trail.

The outsole rubber is fairly flat, making it well-suited for multiple surfaces. Don’t be fooled by the flatness of this feature, however, as it provides excellent traction under wet or slippery surfaces. By not overloading the outsole with extra rubbers in unnecessarily-deep grooves, Saucony kept the Guide 5 light, practical, and performance-oriented.

From a cushioning and guidance standpoint, Saucony’s ProGrid LITE foam provides a reliable and familiar ride for Saucony wearers, and a pleasantly unobtrusive experience for newcomers. The dual-density SSL EVA foam provides a comfortable level of cushioning and rebound after impact—helping the shoe feel springy without providing too much bounce. Of particular interest is the shoe’s impact zones, which provide extra support for the most common landing and push-off areas of the foot. The impact zones, like the rest of the midsole, seek to improve foot comfort and rebound without forcing movement.

As the name implies, these elements seek to guide the foot, but do not force the runner to alter his or her stride greatly. These efforts are supported by the shoes’ new heel drop: though the lower drop may startle some, the end result is a pleasant ride that helps the foot move more naturally without a drastic change.

Saucony’s story of the summer was the introduction of their new, lower heel drop. Slimming down from twelve to eight millimeters created a shift which takes the physiological elements of minimal running and applies them to runners who prefer a guidance shoe. In doing so, the company helped ensure that runners of all strides are able to take advantage of advancements in shoe design. Having a balanced platform makes a difference in a guidance shoe — the Guide 5 allows runners to feel secure and supported within the shoe without being forced to move the foot in any specific direction. This is a tremendous step forward, and though it may take some getting used to for guidance-shoe purists, the experience should be generally positive.

Saucony Guide 5 Upper Unit

As far as the upper is concerned, the Guide 5 features a comfortable ankle collar, which is not only soft but also of an unobtrusive height. As a frequent sufferer of Achilles blisters from too-high collars, the Guide 5 provides a welcome respite from this problem. Even if a runner finds the collar to be higher on this shoe than other pairs, the HydraMAX collar lining would provide a tremendously soft experience which would help prevent blistering.

Throughout the entirety of the midsole is Saucony’s Comfortride sockliner. This was among the greatest features of the shoe, as it provides a truly comfortable experience during runs of varying length and intensity. Although my feet were sore post-marathon, I never felt uncomfortable or suffered blisters on my feet. Considering I was breaking in new shoes so soon after a long race, I was very impressed by how comfortable the experience was; even my go-to shoes (Kinvara 2) take more time to break in than the Guide 5.

As a final, yet appreciated detail, the flat shoelace design helped keep knots in place without loosening, becoming untied, or slipping while running. Previously to the Guide 5, I had not come across this design on a stability shoe; its inclusion was certainly appreciated.

Saucony Guide 5 Opinion

The Guide 5 provides an overall experience that I not only appreciated, but truly loved. In an industry where hype and gimmickry can overshadow true craftsmanship and attention to detail, the Guide 5 bucks the trend.

The shoe is devoid of gimmicky materials, overhyped promises, or overpriced materials. As a result of this, the wearer is left with a shoe that does its job incredibly well—all of the focus is on the run, and not the technology.

Saucony walked a fine line while updating the Guide model, shed weight, reducing heel drop, and improving on a fan favorite without changing things too drastically. While the shoe’s lower heel may come as a surprise to some, it did not provide for a radically different experience.

The Guide 5 provides a dependable, comfortable experience for runners who seek stability as well as responsiveness. Dropping the shoe’s weight and heel-to-toe drop facilitated this aim, and in turn, created a new incarnation of a shoe that provides a great running experience under any set of conditions.

We thank the nice people at Saucony for sending us a pair of Guide 5 to test. This did not influence our review, written after running more than 50 miles in them

Great anticipation has been building for the Wave Inspire 8. Many loyal Inspire runners were taken aback by the sweeping changes made to the Inspire 7. Unfold the tissue paper in the box and you’ll see what looks like a Wave Inspire 6 but you’ll find a new but strikingly familiar ride in the Wave Inspire 8.

Mizuno Wave Inspire 8 Upper:

Mizuno turned back the clock when laying out the plans for the upper of the Wave Inspire 8. Gone is the higher cut heel collar and Dynamotion Fit tab of the Wave Inspire 7. Instead we find a much more lower profile upper with similarly cut overlays as found in the Wave Inspire 6.

Mizuno is still using a wide hole mesh for breathability and the overlay material feels identical to that of my old Wave Inspire 6. Also removed are the flex eyelets and the longer tongue of the Wave Inspire 7.

In fact, the only Wave Inspire 7 design carryover I could find was the inner heel lining material, the Ortholite sock liner and some very slightly modified lateral overlays.

Mizuno Wave Inspire 8 Sole Unit

Mizuno reinvented the entire midsole for the Wave Inspire 8. While the VS-1 cushioning wedge is still found in the heel, everything else has changed.

Mizuno reengineered the wave plate in the Wave Inspire 8 to provide a level of stability that I haven’t seen in this series since the Wave Inspire 4. Not only is the wave plate providing more arch support, Mizuno has also slightly flared the medial aspect of the heel to ensure a stable landing and transition through toe off.

In the forefoot Mizuno has carved out a bit more midsole foam at the flex point and added flex controllers which almost act as a secondary wave in the forefoot. Still in place is Mizuno’s AP+ midsole foam which is a more durable and springy formulation of their classic AP foam.

Mizuno Wave Inspire 8 Opinion

I have liked every version of the Wave Inspire series since I ran in the Wave Inspire 2. However, as the series progressed it became less stable and more geared towards light weight and quick transition thus making every Inspire after the 4 not suitable as my workhorse training shoe. When the Inspire 7 came out I broke my half-marathon personal record twice in them! I had relegated the Inspire series to a distance racing shoe for the most part until I ran in the Wave Inspire 8.

Until now, no other shoe has challenged the Mizuno Wave Nirvana as my go to shoe. The Wave Inspire 8 is a real threat to do just that. I simply cannot keep from reaching for these shoes for every run! In fact, I just took them to the New Orleans Jazz half marathon and shattered my previous best by six minutes.

The Wave Inspire 8 is hitting the sweet spot for me – the arch is there, the transition is still quick and the ride is cushioned but never separated from the road. During the race, I never even thought about my Wave Inspire 8’s. And trust me, New Orleans asphalt will exploit any weakness in a running shoe. Mizuno has turned all the dials to 10 on the Wave Inspire 8. Burn!

Wave Inspire 6 fans, Mizuno has heard you and answered with a low profile heel collar and increased stability. Rejoice!

We thank the nice people at Mizuno for sending us a pair of Wave Inspire 8 for testing. This did not influence our review, written after running more than 50 miles in them

The DS Trainer is marketed as a ligthweight training shoe with added stability. DS stands for “Duo Sole”, a combination of two different outsole material that provide both grip and a feel for the road. The DS series (both Trainer and Racer) is very popular and Asics tried and maintain the aspects that made this shoe a success only adding some details, such as the Heel Clutching System, the introduction of the Guidance Line and some weigth-shaving solutions.

Asics DS Trainer 16 First Impressions

I know I will say this more than once, but the first impression for me had to come from that great racing red colour. Shallow? Yes and no: I am a believer that the aesthetical aspect of a running shoe is important too and the DS Trainer in this colour really stands out from the crowd.

The second aspect that impressed me once taken the shoe out of the box was the weight: I use a lot of different stablity shoes and the DS Trainer felt quite light for a shoe that I plan to use in 10 and 15 mile training runs.

It was question of minutes before I laced them up and launched in my first 10km test run.

Asics DS Trainer 16 Midsole Unit

The midsole of the Trainer 16 is made of Asics’ Solyte foam in two different densities: harder in the heel and softer on the forefoot. This is the first thing I noticed during my first test run: the forefoot is amazingly flexible – but more on this later.

The main contributors of the stability and pronation control aspects of the sole unit are the medial post – the insertion of a harder piece of foam in the medial (internal) side of the midsole that runs from right under the heel up until the ball of the foot – and the use of the Space Trusstic System – a piece of thermoplastic that is placed right under the arch and controls the torsion of the sole unit.

On top of the Space Trusstic, Asics placed a Propulsion Trusstic, another piece of plastic that flexes during the gait and returns to its original position “snapping” right during toe-off.

Asics DS Trainer 16 Outsole

New introduction for the DS 16 is the Guidance Line, a vertically carved flex groove that is supposed to enhance your natural gait, favouring the correct alignment of your foot’s center of gravity during the whole phase.

The flex grooves (carves) in the outsole are not very deep nor that many, but they are aggressively placed – encouraging a fast toe off.

Asics DS Trainer 16 Upper Unit

In my opinion, the upper fit of the DS Trainer is where this shoe really shines.

The toebox is wide (my only complaint about the shoe: a little too wide for my foot) and open. There is virtually no overlay and it feels sock-like.

A stretch material (silver with red dots in the pictures) is inserted among the mesh and expands when your foot does to further prevent irritation.

Asymmetrical lacing: I love it. I hate when I can feel the laces of a shoe on the top of my foot. Run enough miles in a shoe and you will hate it too. Usually I prefer shoes with very padded tongues, as that helps to “hide” the laces feeling. But the asymmetrical lacing is just pure genius. The laces don’t sit on the middle of your foot, but actually follow the shape of your metatarsal bone. Even with a very thin tongue as the one on the DS Trainer, I can’t feel the laces on top of my foot and that really feels great.

Last, the Heel Clutching System. This is basically a different heel construction. A plastic cage is on the outside of the shoe (as opposed to inside the heel as in the majority of running shoes) and it’s slightly more than a thin line of plastic. This gets tensed by the lacing of your laces (the last two holes are connected to this element) and “traps” your heel safely in position. Don’t worry, there’s memory foam on the inside to keep it soft and comfortable.

Asics DS Trainer 16 Opinion

There are some of the technical aspects of the DS Trainer that you notice (the asymetrical laces, the heel clutching system, the flexible forefoot) and some that you don’t (the Guidance Line) but it doesn’t matter: whatever it is that contributes to the overall feeling, it works.

The ride is fast. The forefoot is amazingly flexible for a stability trainer, and you will notice that right away. The weigth of the shoe is closer to 10.5 oz than Asics’ advertised 10, but in a running shoe weigth is as much a feeling as it is a number on the scale. The DS 16 feels light, open, breathable… it feels almost like a racing shoe – but it does feel supportive !

It has become my go-to shoe for 10 km runs.

Please share your opinion in the comments!

We thank the nice people at Asics for sending us a pair of DS Trainer 16 to test. This did not influence our review of the shoes, written after running more than 60 miles in them

The Brooks Trance 10 certainly lives up to its name as soon as you open the box! It’s a visually striking shoe with a lot of design elements happening at once. The Trance 10 is criss-crossed with decorative overlays across the entire shoe. My test pair arrived in a vivid orange and aggressive silver and black colorway. Sporting a rather large medial post and a segmented lateral midsole, the Trance 10 also looks like a lot of shoe. Did it succeed in mesmerizing me on the road? Read on and we shall see…

Brooks Trance 10 Upper

The Trance definitely has the busiest upper I’ve ever seen in a shoe. Many of the overlays span the entire length of the shoe in effort to better center the foot over the midsole. The lower toebox overlay even circles the entire shoe where the upper meets the midsole.

As in the Adrenaline 11, Brooks has included three new technologies to improve the fit and function of the Trance 10.

Four flexible lacing tabs are now included along the eyelet row to help provide a more customized fit around the arch. A new external supplement to the heel counter, called a Heel Cradle, is in place on both medial and lateral portions of the heel. Its job is to provide better centering for an improved heel fit and stability. Brooks also employs a lacing anchor called Tongue Tied on the tongue to halt any sliding of the Trance’s tongue. A cushy BioMogo sock liner finishes out the upper.

Brooks Trance 10 Sole Unit

Being a flagship shoe, The Trance 10 gets all the trimmings Brooks has to offer. The midsole of the Trance 10 is still built around the Brooks Progressive Diagonal Rollbar (PDRB) and its accompanying Diagonal Roll Bar Accel (DRB-Accel) shank. These are easily identified by a quick glance at the medial, or inside, portion of the shoe. The PDRB is the large section of gray foam and the DRB-Accel is the clear plastic bridge under the arch. These are placed in the Trance 10 to help correct an over pronating foot strike.

Over pronation is when a runner’s foot rolls too far inside during the gait cycle and often can be seen by watching how much a runner’s arch collapses when he or she is bearing weight on the foot. These two technologies work together with the “caterpillar” lateral midsole to reduce the amount of pronation a runner experiences. This “caterpillar” design forms the entire lateral midsole into smaller sections which lay down one at a time during running resulting in a smooth transition and greater lateral release.

The Trance 10 midsole is rendered in BioMogo which is Brooks’ environmentally friendly premium midsole foam. According to Brooks, BioMogo decomposes 50 times faster than convention shoe foams when it is placed in a landfill environment.

Providing the cush in the Trance 10 is Brooks brand new full length DNA cushioning system. DNA has now replaced Hydroflow and is a variable density material that responds according to the amount of force placed upon it. At slower paces, DNA is soft and becomes firmer as the runner accelerates.

Brooks Trance 10 Opinion

The Trance 10 is in my favorite category: premium stability. I like a shoe that has all the technological bells and whistles with looks to match. Unfortunately, I wasn’t quite charmed by the Trance 10. The upper of the Trance has more room than its sister shoe, the Adrenaline, which is fine with me. I had no heel fit issues in the Trance as I did in the Adrenaline 11.

However, the Trance magic fizzled a bit in my number one category: arch support. As was the case in the Adrenaline 11, Brooks places the arch too low and too far forward in the Trance for my liking. I have very flexible arches and I demand a shoe to have adequate arch support placed close to my heel. The Trance simply isn’t built this way. In fact, my wife was running behind me and noted that my feet rolled inwards more in the Trance 10 than in my other shoes.

Having said that, the Trance 10 goes into cushioning overdrive and the DNA technology delivers the goods as advertised. The transition in the Trance 10 felt slower than other comparable shoes I’ve run in. I’ve never been a big believer that weight is a determining factor in shoe selection but I couldn’t help but get the feeling that the Trance 10 is best suited for someone with a larger frame. Bigger runners who like a low arched shoe could easily fall under the spell of the Brooks Trance 10.

We thank the nice people at Brooks for sending us a pair of Trance 10 for testing. This did not influence our review of the shoe, written after running more than 60 miles in them.

Brooks’ best-selling Adrenaline series enters into its second decade of production with a few upper tweaks and a new cushioning system while still aiming to satisfy the many runners who have come to rely on the aptly named Go To Series (GTS). Brooks builds the shoe specifically for the runner who needs extra stability in their footwear.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 11 Sole Unit

The Adrenaline 11 GTS, like its predecessors, is built around the Brooks Progressive Diagonal Roll Bar (PDRB) medial posting and Diagonal Roll Bar Accel (DRB-Accel) mid foot shank. Medial posting is a section of firm foam found on the medial (arch) aspect of many stability class shoes. This construction technique is used to help control over pronation. Over pronation occurs when a runner’s foot lands and moves too far inward, often a cause of running injuries such as plantar fasciitis, achilles tendonitis and medial shin splints.

Brooks actually employs three different densities of foam in the Adrenaline GTS 11 to help slow down the inward movement of an over pronator’s foot. The softest foam is found on the outside of the heel and progresses to the firmest foam under the medial aspect of the foot. The DRB-Accel midfoot shank is a plastic reinforcement for the midfoot area of the shoe and helps neutralize the twisting forces that an over pronating runner places on their footwear.

The entire midsole foam is still comprised of Brooks Bio MoGo, a foam formulation that begins to decompose 50 times faster than traditional foams once it hits a landfill environment. However, the biggest news for the Adrenaline GTS 11 is the replacement of Brooks long-standing Hydroflow cushioning system with a new technology that Brooks calls DNA.

DNA cushioning is geared to respond to the amount of force placed upon it and respond accordingly. During slower running DNA remains soft but when the pace quickens, DNA responds with firmer energy return. In the Adrenaline GTS 11, DNA is placed in the heel and forefoot.

To further aid in cushioning and provide smooth transition through foot strike, Brooks has created a lateral caterpillar heel section for the GTS 11. This helps the shoe lay down one small section at a time, much like how its namesake insect moves. This technology is easily identifiable as Brooks color matches it to the logo on the upper.

Adrenaline GTS 11 Upper

The Adrenaline GTS 11 upper now includes three new technologies designed to improve the fit of the shoe. Brooks has installed a lacing tab, named Tongue Tied, that prevents the tongue from sliding during running. The mid foot arch wrap has also been redesigned and now features four separate lacing tabs that attach to the upper via flexible straps, resulting in a more customizable arch fit.

Also included is Brooks new Heel Cradle design which reinforces the heel counter and helps keep the foot centered on the platform. Reflective details are found on both the heel and forefoot to provide extra visibility during low light conditions. Rounding out the upper is a sockliner constructed from Bio MoGo foam.

Adrenaline GTS 11 Opinion

Without a doubt, the Adrenaline series is loved by many runners. I see them on people’s feet every day. Unfortunately, I didn’t feel the love from the Adrenaline GTS 11. On paper, the shoe looks like it would be ideal for me but when the rubber met the road it was a different story altogether.

A stability shoe lives and dies by two things with me: arch placement and heel fit. On my first run in the GTS 11 I knew that the arch was wrong for my feet. If I wear a shoe with too low of an arch, I get fatigue and then pain in my posterior tibial tendon, especially in my left foot. The posterior tibial tendon runs down the inside of the leg and ends under the navicular bone in the foot. Its primary job is to slow down pronation in the arch of the foot. With the Adrenaline, my foot pronated too far inside the shoe before I engaged the PDRB resulting in early lower leg fatigue. The Adrenaline has an arch, but it’s just too low and too far forward in the shoe. If Brooks were to place the arch closer to the heel it would likely sit nicely under my navicular and take some strain off of it.

Secondly, I couldn’t get a good heel fit in the GTS 11. I have a very average regular width foot and I rarely have issues with the fit of a shoe’s upper. It seemed as though the Adrenaline was bullet shaped; wider in the heel and narrower in the toebox. When I tightened the laces to secure the heel it ended up being too tight on the midfoot aspect of the shoe.

However, I did find the Adrenaline GTS 11 to be a very smooth riding and quiet shoe. The DNA cushioning system felt more than adequate and I was impressed with the caterpillar heel section as it made for an easy transition. I also appreciated the shoes low profile feel, despite my issues with the heel fit. I can definitely understand why so many runners love this shoe but it is simply not the fit for me. Best suited for runners with very low arches and flat feet.

We thank the nice people at Brooks for sending us a pair of Adrenaline GTS 11 to test. This did not influence our review of the shoes, written by running more than 50 miles in them.

From first glance, Newtons are a breed apart from other running shoes. The designs feature unique elements which purport to improve gait and movement — translating into better form and a more natural experience. The company’s shoes have gained a cult following over the past few years, which has led to the Newton’s first foray into a dedicated trail shoe. The Momentus features many similar design functions as Newton’s other offerings, customized for running on uneven trails and surfaces. The Momentus is an ambitious entry into the trail shoe market, and provides an interesting, comfortable experience under a wide array of conditions.

Newton Terra Momentus Impressions

As a convert to midfoot striking after a long time spent heel striking, I have always been interested in shoes which seek to promote gait improvement. Since changing gait is not always an easy task, I’ve monitored this shoe niche closely — hoping that there would be a shoe which could live up to the promise of better form. Despite my initial skepticism, I was eager to try the Newton Momentus — a shoe designed to not only perform on uneven terrains and trails, but to also promote natural movement through the foot and ankle. Always interested in improving my gait while out on my favorite trails, I was eager to see how Newton’s shoe design might help.

I was unsure at first about what I should expect from the Momentus. Newton’s FAQ page recommends transitioning into their shoes, as they provide a running experience which can be a large departure from what more conventional shoes provide during a workout. I began to cycle the shoes into my marathon training, using my shorter days to test out the design as compared to minimalist and lightweight trainers. I immediately noticed the reduced heel drop, or the difference in heigth between heel and toe — a scant three millimeters — which helps the middle of the foot land first. Next, and most noticeably, I felt the signature lug units which provide additional cushioning around the ball of the foot. Though they took some getting used to, this feature provided a unique method of ensuring I landed properly on my feet while providing extra support in the area. The design seemed unconventional at first — especially while walking — but as I began running in the shoes, I realized why their designs have gained a cult following and a strong footing in the New York City racing circuit.

Newton Terra Momentus Sole Unit

The Momentus’ sole is among its most noticeably unique features. The outsole is comprised of heavy-duty rubber featuring deep grooves which help maintain stability and grip on wet and/or loose trails. The high-traction rubber is among the sturdiest I’ve found on any shoes I’ve worn, and provides tremendous benefits while trail running.

The midsole of the Newton provides unique features as well. Newton’s “Action/Reaction Technology” midsole is the brand’s most remarkable and noticeable design feature. The construction of the midsole uses a hinged design which promotes movement in the toes, metatarsals, arch, and heel—all aimed at promoting healthy movement of the foot throughout takeoff and landing while running. Put simply, this design feature seeks to help the foot move in a manner which mimics natural, barefoot motion. The shoe’s actuator lugs, four raised rubber platforms at the metatarsal, help provide an extra spring in the step as a reward for proper footfall and gait. In addition to these design features, the midsole includes a mid- and rear-foot support chassis which helps keep the foot in place while running on uneven trails. Though the actuator lugs may take a first-timer by surprise, the design feature never felt obtrusive to me, as it promotes midfoot form.

Newton Terra Momentus Upper Unit

Netwon’s non-trail offerings tend to feature a lightweight, breathable mesh similar to that found in the Nike Free and Saucony Kinvara. As the Momentus is a trail shoe first and foremost, the upper design provides more reinforcement and protection for the foot. As a result, it is thicker and heavier than other models, but provides protection from rocks, sticks, and other trail debris without making the shoe feel overly heavy. Additional features, such as slip-proof laces and a sturdy toe cap, seek to provide protection for the foot as well as stability. As the Momentus was my first foray into trail-specific shoes, these features provided an additional level of comfort that I would not come home to shoes filled with detritus from my run—a welcome change of pace from trail runs in all-around trainers. All in all, the sturdiness of the shoe’s upper helped keep my feet in the right position despite steep hills and unlevel surfaces. These features will come as a welcome complement to any trail workout as they offer support without adding heft or tiring out the feet prematurely.

Newton Terra Momentus Opinion

For all of its unique design features and surprisingly flashy color scheme (green on light-green), the Newton Momentum lives up to its promises. The shoe provides unobtrusive support for runners seeking additional guidance as well as protection from the elements. The shoes’ unique design truly promotes midfoot running, helping develop proprioception for runners looking to alter their gait or improve what they already practice. The upper also helps keep the foot in place comfortably, and without the annoying presence of rocks and small sticks after even the longest trail runs. The Momentus is a great trail shoe for runners seeking motion guidance while running trails—leading me to hope for a more minimal offering for trail runners to complement their current road offerings.

We thank the nice people at Newton for sending us a pair of the Terra Momentus for review. This did not influence our review, written after running more than 30 miles in them.

Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11

• Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 General Info:

Now entering its second decade of production, the Mizuno Wave Alchemy returns with a new upper and midsole material while retaining the supportive ride that Alchemy runners have come to rely on. As Mizuno’s only motion control shoe, the Wave Alchemy 11 is poised to compete with the Brooks Beast and Ariel, the Asics Foundation and Evolution and the New Balance 1123 and 1012.

• Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 Sole Unit:

The nucleus of any Mizuno running shoe is its wave plate. The Mizuno Wave technology utilizes plastic plates that are tuned for different types of feet. The Wave Alchemy 11 employs Mizuno’s most supportive dual fan wave which is engineered to provide targeted support for moderate to severe over pronators. Over pronation occurs when the foot strikes the ground and the arch of the foot collapses too far inward. This excessive motion is great for absorbing the shock of foot strike but also can over stress the plantar fascia and lower leg musculature resulting in injury. The Wave Alchemy 11 plate begins at the heel and travels the entire length of the arch thus controlling over pronation and allowing for a more neutral, centered foot strike.

Alchemy 11 (left) vs 10 (right)

At first glance, the Wave Alchemy 11 midsole seems identical to the Wave Alchemy 10. However, the Wave Alchemy 11 gets a substantial improvement with the addition of AP+ midsole foam. AP+ is Mizuno’s upgraded formulation of their classic AP foam and it boasts improved durability and a bouncier, more lively ride. Mizuno’s VS-1 cushioning compound is still found in the heel and Gender Engineering is also carried over from the Wave Alchemy 10. Gender Engineering is Mizuno’s approach to designing the heel and tread patterns to better suit unique male and female foot strike characteristics.

• MizuMizuno Wave Alchemy 11 Upper:

The Wave Alchemy 11 is most strikingly different in its upper design. The Wave Alchemy 11 still retains Mizuno’s Dynamotion Fit collar tab but employs a different mid foot saddle aimed at better locking the foot down and preventing lateral movement inside the shoe. An Ortholite sockliner is still standard equipment. Other changes include a tighter heel fit and softer overlays. Interestingly, the bottom of the Mizuno runbird logo is now placed completely over the lower medial and lateral overlay instead of being sewn under them as in the Wave Alchemy 10. By doing this Mizuno removes one more potential spot of irritation and makes the shoe more streamlined inside. This seemingly small detail shows just how much attention Mizuno puts into the design and update process of their footwear.

Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 (left) vs 10 (right) upper

• Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 Opinion:

Again, I’m impressed with the latest version of the Wave Alchemy. I ran a trouble free marathon in the Wave Alchemy 10 a week after a hard 15K race. Although I don’t fit the traditional motion control paradigm at 6’ tall and 160 pounds, I have very flexible arches which will give me trouble if I don’t use a supportive shoe. I’m actually at the upper end of what most stability shoes can handle but Mizuno always comes through for me with the Wave Alchemy and Wave Nirvana series.

The Wave Alchemy 11 has a solid ride that transitions well and is durable enough for daily training just like its predecessor. I did notice that the new AP+ foam does indeed feel bouncier and I also appreciated the heel fit of the Wave Alchemy 11 versus the 10. However, it does seem that the upper in the Wave Alchemy 11 has more volume than before. This will probably fit a thicker foot better but I have not had any issues thus far. Having said that, I still prefer the lower profile upper in the Wave Alchemy 10. The Wave Alchemy 11 does outshine the 10 in regards to heel fit as the new design is simply more locked in than before.

The Wave Alchemy 11 continues to provide a lighter, faster feeling option in the motion control category. Rarely does one find a shoe as simultaneously runnable and supportive as the Wave Alchemy 11. It’s a speeding bullet when compared to the motion control competition. It’s not a shoe I would take to a 5K but the Wave Alchemy 11 will handle all the training miles necessary to get you to your personal best on race day.

Review by Theo Clyatt

Let us know what you think of this shoe in the comments!

• Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 Price Comparison:

	Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 Shoes (white/cyber Yellow) - Men's Shoes - 11.5 M shoes.com Free shippings, Free returns	$109.20
	Mizuno Men's Wave Alchemy 11 Running Shoe endless.com FREE overnight shipping, FREE return shipping (for 365 days).	$114.95
	Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 - Men's - Shoes - White Onlineshoes Free shippings, free exchanges, 365 days returns.	$114.95
	Men's Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11 Running Shoe - White/orange 8.5 RoadRunnerSports EXTRA 25% OFF WITH CODE CX12J120 UNTIL Feb 8th ! Free shipping, 60-day perfect fit guarantee: possible to exchange shoes after using them for two months.	$114.95
	Mizuno - Wave Alchemy 11 (white/super Pink/artisans Gold) - Footwear Zappos Free shipping both ways (free return shipping), 365 days returns	$115.00

Nike Lunarglide 3

• Nike LunarGlide+ 3 General Info:

The Nike LunarGlide is back for 2011 and now with a completely updated sole unit and upper.
I’ve been a long time user of the original LunarGlide because it was a kind of the Jack of All trades for running shoes. I was surprised at how light and comfortable it felt that I ended up using it not just for running but also wore it casually every now and then. Fast forward to 2011 where Nike announced the LunarGlide+ 3, and this time I felt there are enough changes from the original to justify a new purchase. Right out of the box the new LunarGlide’s look slightly slimmer than the original and the impression at first wear is that it ‘fits like a glove’ or in this case a sock with lots of cushioning without really constricting your feet in an uneasy manner especially on the toe area, where I felt the original LG’s were a bit too roomy.

• Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Sole Unit:

What I like most about the LunarGlide is that it provides both support and cushioning without compromising one or the other. The new version does it better because of the evolution of the Dynamic Support System: the midsole is designed like a wedge that provides more cushioning for over-pronators on heel impact and slowly rolls them back into normal position.
What this means is a more comfortable run whether you’re the type that lands on your heel or mid-foot, and I’m very happy with how bouncy this shoe feels even when running on concrete.

Lunarglide 1 vs 3 - Rear View

Nike Lunarglide 1 vs 3 - Outsole View

• Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Upper:

After trying on the shoes for my first run I immediately felt that it was an even better fit than the first LunarGlides. The breathable mesh fabric remains pretty much the same as the original but the bonded material (synthetic overlay) now provides added protection at the toe area and crosses over at the mid-foot.

Lunarglide 1 vs 3 - Upper View

The tongue is actually attached to the shoe on the sides as well so that everything meshes together and that means fewer seams inside, which in turn reduces irritation. Another thing that you’ll notice, mainly because of its striking colors, is that they replaced the Nike Flywire with a different mid-foot strap/arch-wrap. The key difference is that the new arch-wrap goes under so that it can provide better support around your foot and not just from the sides. On top of this, Nike also added grooves into the sock liner so that it would work well with these new wrap-around straps. That all sounds well and good but in my opinion the material doesn’t look as durable as the Flywire. And it disrupts the overall look of the shoe because it looks like there’s a paper cut-out that’s popping up in the middle of the shoe.

• Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Opinion:

One of the biggest hurdles in running is that you can actually become overwhelmed with the amount of info you need to in or consider before even starting to run. The LunarGlide eliminates a lot of the research required for finding the right shoe because it caters to a wide range of runners.

Earlier I referred to these shoes as the Jack of all trades but the LunarGlide+ 3 is even better, it’s a master of some! The snug fit is perfect and feels really good on your feet while still providing enough support to facilitate long runs. Some runners might actually have problems with how soft the shoe is.

All in all LunarGlide+ 3 is a really good all-around running shoe and is a significant step-up from its predecessors. It’s a lot softer & springy but still manages to feel even more secure on your foot. I’ve been using these shoes on the treadmill, on the track, on the road and I’ll be running my nest 10K race in these shoes next month as well.

Review by Erwin Ramos

Let us know what you think of this shoe in the comments!

• Nike LunarGlide+ 3 Price Comparison:

	Nike Lunarglide+ 3 Grey Fa11 Running Shoes KellerSports European Running Store (prices in euro).	89.90
	Nike - Lunarglide+ 3 (pure Platinum/wolf Grey/max Orange/black) - Footwear Zappos Free shipping both ways (free return shipping), 365 days returns	$90.00
	Nike Lunarglide+ 3 Men's Running Shoes, White/anthracite/pure Platinum/volt Finish Line Free shipping, returns on unused items only	$99.98
	Nike Men's Lunarglide+ 3 Running Shoes Altrec Free shipping for orders over 45$	$109.95
	Men's Nike Lunarglide+ 3 Running Shoe - Red/grey 8 RoadRunnerSports EXTRA 25% OFF WITH CODE CX12J120 UNTIL Feb 8th ! Free shipping, 60-day perfect fit guarantee: possible to exchange shoes after using them for two months.	$109.95
	Nike Lunarglide+ 3 Id Custom Men's Running Shoes - Orange, 13 Nike Nike official store. Free shipping on all orders over 100$.	$145.00

Saucony Progrid Guide 3

• Saucony Progrid Guide 3 General Info:

Saucony chose to stick with what works in the most recent version of the Progrid Guide, their best selling model and popular lightweight stability shoe which has earned accolades for high mileage durability and just the right amount of support. As an avid wearer of the Progrid Guide 2 I was not expecting Saucony to change much in their flagship lightweight stability shoe. With enough stability to control moderate pronation Saucony stayed with the same dual density midsole for support and changed very little, adding additional forefoot cushioning ( a very nice touch) and changing the tongue of the shoe minimally. One thing that impressed me about the Guide 3 is that the fit and feel of the shoe improved with miles and I liked this shoe better at 100 miles than I did out of the box, always the sign of a great shoe.

Saucony Progrid Guide 3 lateral view

• Saucony Progrid Guide 3 First Impressions:

Weighing in at 11.9 oz this is not a minimalist shoe by any means. It is a traditional stability running shoe meant to compete with the Asics 2150, Adidas Sequence, Nike Structure Triax, or Brooks Ravenna. Featuring a traditional 12 mm heel to toe drop the Progrid Guide 3 looks like many other trainers lining the walls of your local running store. The difference is that the Guide 3 is a workhorse of a shoe that works for a variety of runners and seems to have incredible qualities of durability.

Out of the box I noticed that the toebox of the Guide 3 remains shallow, a typical Saucony fit feature, but feels wider than the toebox of the Guide 2. The improved forefoot cushioning is substantial and I noticed the recuperative benefits in my legs immediately. The shoe’s upper gives a very secure fit and I noticed an improved snugness in the heel of the shoe. The heel cushioning and supportive features feel protective but not bulky by any means, and the shoe has a light feel of a much lighter trainer.

• Saucony Progrid Guide 3 Performance:

The Progrid Guide series has been aimed at those needing minimal to moderate stability since the lines’ inception. However, at 12 oz this shoe fails to be lightweight by today’s standards. The feel of the EVA cushioning in the heel is fairly soft and the forefoot is a bit more firm. Stability components include dual density EVA on the medial side of the shoe which is reinforced by a medial post. The ride or heel-toe transition of the shoe feels smooth and feels low profile despite the 12 mm heel to toe drop. It does compete well with the Asics 2160 and the Nike Structure Triax, offering a similar weight and blend of support without feeling bulky.

Saucony Progrid Guide 3 Gait

• Saucony Progrid Guide 3 Opinion:

The Saucony Progrid Guide 3 is a great all around stability trainer for those looking for a durable shoe. Each year that Saucony releases a new version of this shoe it is very similar to previous model, and in my opinion the newer version of the shoe, the Progrid Guide 4, continues this tradition. I do not agree with this shoe being lightweight enough to fit into the lightweight stability category where 10 oz seems to be the gold standard. If you are looking for a lighter weight Saucony model with stability features look to the Saucony Mirage to fulfill your needs.

Saucony Progrid Guide 3 Upper view

Similar Shoes:Asics 2160
Adidas Supernova Sequence
Nike Structure Triax
Brooks Ravenna

For those looking for lighter weight:
Asics DS-trainer
Saucony Mirage
Adidas Adizero Aegis

Review by Thomas Caughlan

Let us know what you think of this shoe in the comments!

• Saucony Progrid Guide 3 Price Comparison:

Saucony Progrid Guide 3 Shoes (silver/ Blue) - Men's Shoes - 13.0 M shoes.com Free shippings, Free returns

$94.99