Written by

Brandon Law

Marathon Runner and Shoe Expert
The Kayano is Asics’ top of the range stability trainer; the Structure is a stable neutral trainer with no medial post. Here we will be comparing these two trainers.
Asics Kayano vs Nike Structure

The Kayano is one of the most popular stability trainers. Runners love how supportive, cushioned and durable it is. It is also very similar in fit and ride from update to update. The Kayano 31 costs $165.

The Structure 25 has been completely redone. It is no longer classified as a stability trainer but it still has features which make it highly stable. The Structure costs $120.

Which of these supportive trainers is for you?

Similarity and differences: Gel Kayano 31 vs Structure 25

Brand
Shoe type
Expert score
Expert score
9/10
Expert score
7/10
Weight
11 oz
11.4 oz
Heel Drop
10 mm
10 mm
Verdict
Overall, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 is a solid choice for runners seeking stability and comfort without sacrificing performance. Its supportive midsole, adaptive upper, and durable outsole combine to offer a reliable platform for long-distance training.
The Nike Air Zoom Structure 25 is a supportive daily trainer best suited to easy runs. It has a new Cushlon 3.0 midsole and a forefoot airbag but it doesn’t have very good energy return. Compared to the Structure 24, it feels more like a traditional stability trainer because of its prominent arch. Although it has a bland ride, it’s a stable, durable workhorse, making it excellent value for its $120 price tag.
Recommended for
Daily training
Daily training
Cushioning type
Balanced/plush
Responsive/balanced
Cushioning amount
Highly cushioned
Medium cushioning
Flexibility
medium
flexible
Stability
very stable
very stable
Sizing
true to size
true to size
Retail price
US$164.95
US$130

Sole unit: Gel Kayano 31 vs Structure 25

The midsole of the Kayano is made from one foam: FF Blast+.

The midsole of the Structure is made from a new foam called Cushlon 3.0. It rides medium soft which means that it is suitable for slow runs, recovery runs or slightly faster runs.

The softer Structure makes it more suited to slower, long runs compared to the Kayano which can handle faster runs better.

The Kayano has gel technology inside its midsole: the heel gel unit is hidden. The gel adds extra shock absorption and cushioning.

The Structure has a Zoom Air unit in its midsole but only in the forefoot. The air unit provides extra responsiveness upon toe off.

The big difference between the gel of the Kayano and the air bag of the Structure is that the gel can’t be felt underfoot while the air bag is very prominent and can easily be felt underfoot. This makes the Kayano’s ride transitions smoother than the Structure transitions.

The 10mm drop of the Kayano makes it more suited to heel strikers than the 8mm drop of the Structure. There is more cushioning and foam in the heel of the Kayano to soften heel strikes.

On the outsole of the Kayano is harder carbon rubber in the heel and softer blown rubber in the forefoot.

The Structure’s outsole also has harder carbon rubber on the lateral heel crash pad with blown rubber on the main section.

Stability in the Kayano is achieved through a firmer medial post to prevent overpronation while stability in the Structure is achieved through a higher, built-up medial side of the midsole.

Both are very stable trainers but the Kayano offers more stability than the Structure.

Upper unit: Gel Kayano 31 vs Structure 25

The upper of the Kayano is super plush and made from engineered jacquard mesh. There are no overlays except for the Tiger logo on the sides. The big feature is the rear external heel counter which keeps your heel locked in place. It fits true to size and is also available in wide and extra wide versions.

The upper of the Structure is also very plush and more suited to cooler climates because of all the padding. The Structure has an internal heel counter instead of a hard external one but foot lockdown is still excellent. The Structure is only available in a regular width and is true to size.

Which one to buy: Gel Kayano 31 vs Structure 25

If you’re a runner looking for a traditional stability trainer with a firmer medial post, then the Kayano is the better option. It is better suited to faster efforts because of its firmer midsole and the gel in its midsole provides extra shock absorption. It costs $40 more than the Structure but it has a more secure heel counter and a higher level of stability.

If you’re a runner looking for a new type of stability trainer which rides more like a neutral shoe, the Structure is the better option. It has no medial post but instead has a built up medial side and a wide base. The Structure is great value for money and has a forefoot Zoom Air unit for extra pop.

Best price online: Gel Kayano 31 vs Structure 25


This expert review is written by

Brandon Law

Marathon Runner and Shoe Expert
Brandon is a South African who lives and trains in Malaysia. He is a marathon runner who eats, sleeps and dreams running shoes. While most people wear shoes to run, he runs to wear shoes.