Nike Structure 26 review

Nike Structure 26 Introduction

The Structure 26 is Nike’s most popular stability focused running shoe, hence the name. But it’s not just a stable shoe, it also offers the right amount of cushioning and energy return.

This shoe looks nothing like the previous model, with improvements abound. The new ReactX Foam is utilized throughout its midsole. Noticeable padding additions in the tongue and around the heel improve the comfort and allow for secured lockdown without rubbing or discomfort. The visible midfoot support system is also an obvious feature you can’t miss.

These shoes come in at 11.3oz in men’s size 10. As with most stability and cushioning shoes, you’re giving up weight for added comfort and support. In my experience, I’d prefer the latter. Also consistent with stability shoes, the heel-to-toe drop is higher than most neutral running shoes at 10mm.

A comparable alternative to the Structure 26 would be Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24.

The price point of the Structure 26 is $145.

Nike Structure 26 First Impressions

Lacing up these shoes and walking around was quite comfortable right off the bat. I immediately noticed the 10mm heel to toe drop. This wasn’t a bad thing, just an observation. The ReactX midsole provided a firm foundation with each step. Another quick observation was the Midsole Support System. I really liked the amount of arch support. As a person with high arches, it’s hard to find shoes with this type of support.

Running in these shoes created a few opinions for me. First, they are more of a stability shoe than not. If you’re not specifically looking for a stability shoe, I wouldn’t look too far into these. Next is that they’re sort of one dimensional. Good for slow and steady runs of various distances. I didn’t find them particularly enjoyable at higher paces or tempo runs.

Nike Structure 26 Upper

There’s plenty to be excited about when it comes to the comfort and fit of the upper. Engineered mesh is the material of choice and easily adapts to the contours and uniqueness of each individual’s feet. The mesh is average in the area of breathability.

Much improved from the Structure 25 is the design and materials of the heel collar and tongue. Runners will experience the ability to lace up these shoes nice and tight without the risk of rubbing or blisters around the heel. This makes the lockdown particularly secure. The tongue is also highly padded and actually a bit on the bulky side in my opinion. It reduces hot spots under the laces but feels like there’s extra material at times.

Regarding the fit, Nike designed the toe box to be wider than the previous model. This will appeal to runners with wider feet. I personally like a bit of extra room. Especially for longer runs.

Nike Structure 26 Sole Unit

My experience with the Structure 26 was a rather firm and unforgiving ride. There’s no shortage of midsole foam, but it doesn’t equal a soft and cushy feeling. Since this is a stability shoe, we know they need to support and guide the runner’s gait which was evident each time I ran in them. I personally prefer a neutral, free flowing shoe with a lively ride.

ReactX is the new midsole that runs through these shoes. Nike built this material to provide more energy return all yet also being more environmentally friendly. They report ReactX saves 43% of energy in the manufacturing process compared to the previous React and amazingly creates 13% more energy return. It’s truly amazing the advances in technology in midsole materials and ReactX is another example of this.

Nike Structure 26 Conclusions

I won’t hide the fact that the Structure 26 was not one of my favorite shoes to run in. But that’s more a reflection on my preferences than the shoe itself.

I don’t need a stability shoe which is why it felt a bit restrictive, rigid and one dimensional. Nonetheless, they shine in areas of arch support, heel support and guiding each step to be just like the last.

For runners needing this type of support, the Structure 26 is an ideal choice.