For the advanced runners out there, this is a great easy day shoe and recovery run shoe. It’s very stable and can handle. For beginner to intermediate runners, this is a versatile shoe that can handle nearly every run. If you’re looking for a high stack shoe (i.e. thick midsole) that is stable, this is the shoe for you. I could see some marathoners, possibly those running 4 hours or slower, using this as a race shoe if you’re not using a carbon-plated one.
If you are not a fan of the higher stack height shoes, then this shoe is not going to be good for you. If you want a shoe that will help you feel fast, then look elsewhere as this shoe will be a bit too clunky and heavy for you. I would not purchase this shoe if you like a cushioned shoe that is soft on landing.
Now in its 27th edition, the Gel-Nimbus continues to be one of the longest tenured running shoes in the Asics lineup.
While we have seen some significant changes in the past, this year’s edition really only had two standout improvements: added stack height without adding weight and a different design for the upper to increase comfort and breathability.
The shoe weighs 10.8 oz for a Men’s size 9. Compared to other comparable shoes, this is a bit on the heavy side yet it doesn’t always feel that heavy when running. The Gel-Nimbus has a fairly wide base that contributes to the very stable feeling while you’re gliding along on a run.
The Gel-Nimbus sits atop the cushioned line of Asics shoes (Gel-Cumulus is in that line as well).
This is considered their plush, max-cushioned daily trainers in line with the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v14, the Mizuno Neo Zen, or the Brooks Glycerin Max.
Within the Asics family, there is also the Novablast 5 that has the same midsole foam but is missing the PureGel® technology in the heel. It seems that the Novablast is softer and bouncier but much less table than the Gel-Nimbus. The outsole grip is also different as the Gel-Nimbus has their premier rubber called HYBRID ASICSGRIP® that should give the runner better traction on the roads.
The pricing of the shoe went up by $5 USD this year to $165. You’re certainly paying more for the premium nature of the shoe and the added expense likely is a nod to the higher stack height. Comparatively, it’s priced the same as the NB 1080, $15 more than the Mizuno Neo Zen, and $35 less than the Glycerin Max. Is it worth it? Read on to find out!
When I first opened this box, the shoe looked almost exactly like the Gel-Nimbus 26 from last year. Picking up the shoe, it felt the same. It makes sense that the shoe is the same weight and so it feels the same and who can blame someone for not noticing 2mm of added stack height to the midsole?
That said, putting on the shoe was a different story. The shoe had its customary plus feel but the shoe felt even more stable than last year’s version. It feels like the shoe widened its base a bit. One thing on the negative side that stood out was that their felt like a slight pinch point at the top of my foot where the lace holes were. It feels like there was a more solid piece of something in the engineered upper that dug into the top of my foot when I tightened my laces. It wasn’t the biggest deal nor did it cause any problems, but I felt it.
My first run in the shoe was a recovery run of 3 miles. Even though my legs were tired, the shoe felt comfortable and I actually was able to go faster than I anticipated. No irritations after this first run but the shoe did feel a little flat.
The next run would be a bit more of a test as it was a regular easy run but with 4 strides at the end. I was curious how the shoe would handle the faster pace of the strides. To my surprise, it did pretty well. I didn’t feel like the shoe was holding me back for those 20 seconds. At the time, I had my doubts that it could handle that speed for longer but it was comforting to know that I didn’t have to change out shoes or pick something else out if I wanted to add strides to a run.
I will say that it took until my next run for the shoe to finally feel like it was broken in (that was after about 11 miles in the shoe). So if you’re interested in this shoe, it might take a couple runs or more to get them broken in and feeling like they’re ready to go.
The upper on this shoe is generally well-constructed. The entire upper is made of soft, stretchy engineered mesh. This helps the shoe conform to your foot while creating a plush feel all around. The tongue is gusseted and thin. It’s likely one of the best tongues out there.
The only hot spot that I had was on the top of my foot near the last lace hole. There was something in the engineered upper that was almost like a little ball that dug into my foot slightly. It didn’t hurt but my foot felt sore in that area the next day when I went for a run after I used it for a long run.
The laces are fine and they stay tied on a single knot throughout all of my run.
Overall, the shoe fit true to size for me. This shoe does come in wide widths options.
The midsole unit is made of two major parts: the PureGel™ in the heel surrounded by the FF Blast™ PLUS ECO foam. For those that are Eco-conscious, FF Blast™ foam is made of 24% bio-based materials.
The heel drop is 8mm, with a height of about 43.5mm in the heel and 35.5mm in the forefoot for an 8mm offset. While the offset remains the same from last year’s model, the overall height is 1.5mm higher. There was a bit of rocker technology added last year to the heel and that remains for this version. It isn’t the most pronounced rocker but it certainly does make the heel-to-toe transition smooth.
I found the ride of the shoe to be very stable and smooth overall. I didn’t think it was a very soft landing, though, for a max-cushioned shoe. I would label it more firm and responsive than soft. I believe that is a plus for this shoe, though, because it makes the shoe much more versatile.
It can handle the easy runs all the way through the tempo paces. Said differently, this shoe can likely handle paces up to the half-marathon for most beginner to intermediate runners in training. I think there is a large subset of people who will feel comfortable with this shoe as a marathon or half-marathon racing shoe if you’re seeking comfort over performance.
The midsole was not responsive enough to handle the V02max type paces (think in the 5k pace range) for anything longer than 1 minute.
The rubber outsole remains the same as last year and the design of the bottom is relatively similar. I had no issues with using this shoe in wet or slushy snow conditions. The stability of the shoe stands out.
Overall, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is a great daily trainer that allows for some slightly faster efforts while providing great stability and comfort.
That said, the improvements from the Gel-Nimbus 26 are very slight and I’m just not sure it’s worth the price upgrade. If you love the Gel-Nimbus line, I’m certain you can find the 26 on a discount right now and I’m probably purchasing that instead.
I don’t think the slightly higher stack height is worth it and the upper did create a little bit of irritation for me.
If you’re looking for a higher stack shoe and have enjoyed the Asics offerings, then go for this shoe. Otherwise, save your money and purchase the 26 while it’s on sale and in stock. I would also consider saving yourself some money and lean into the Mizuno Neo Zen.
1 week ago
After 250 miles in the Nimbus 27, I can confidently say it’s one of the best daily trainers I’ve used. The FFBlast+ cushioning provides excellent impact protection while maintaining a responsive feel – perfect for my marathon training. Compared to the 26, the upper irritation is noticeable but improves after break-in. Used these for multiple 20-milers and a recent 3:30 marathon finish. The stability features work well for my slight overpronation without feeling intrusive. While similar to the Glycerin 22, I prefer the smoother transition of the Nimbus. Despite the premium price, the durability and versatility make it a worthwhile investment.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 week ago
Hey everyone! Looking at grabbing these for my spring training but sizing has me worried. I’m usually a 9.5 in the Nimbus 26 but heard these fit differently? Also dealing with some plantar fasciitis – anyone with similar issues tried these? The drop specs look promising but would love real-world feedback!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Need something cushy for my recovery days but my route includes some packed dirt trails. Can these handle a bit of off-road? Also live in Seattle – how do they do in the rain? Don’t want soggy feet for miles!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 weeks ago
Just picked these up after wearing the 26 for a year. The upper does feel different but not necessarily better. Might return these and grab another pair of 26s while they’re on sale.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Been running in the Bondi 8s but looking at the Nimbus 27 for my recovery days. My feet run wide and I’m worried about the toe box. Also, these aren’t cheap – how’s everyone’s holding up after a few hundred miles? Getting some hot spots in my current shoes so that’s a concern too.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
The Nimbus 27 has been my go-to shoe for the past 3 months of marathon training. The cushioning is perfect for long runs – did my 20-miler in these with zero foot fatigue. They feel more stable than my old Hoka Bondi 8s while maintaining similar cushioning. The upper does have some hotspots initially but breaks in nicely after 40-50 miles. I’ve found them versatile enough for everything from recovery runs to steady-state efforts around marathon pace. Already ordered a second pair for my fall marathon training. Only wish they had more exciting colorways!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Coming from the Nimbus 25, I’ve put about 200 miles on the 27 and find it to be a reliable workhorse. The upper initially caused some irritation around the heel but breaking them in solved this. Used these for marathon training – everything from easy runs to progressive long runs. The stability features really shine in the latter miles when fatigue sets in. Compared to the Brooks Ghost 15, these offer more cushioning while maintaining good ground feel. Love how they handle both recovery days and steady-state runs around 8:30 pace. The responsiveness is there when you need it but never feels harsh. Excellent daily trainer – only criticism is the minimal improvements over version 26.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Just replaced my beat-up Nimbus 25s with these. Heads up – the upper is giving me some weird hot spots around the collar. Had to mess around with different lacing patterns to make it work. They’re decent shoes but honestly, if you’ve got the 26, save your money for now. Not enough upgrades to justify the price jump.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
I’ve put the Nimbus 27 through its paces with over 300 miles of training, including two 20-mile long runs during marathon prep. The cushioning holds up remarkably well – still feels fresh after all those miles. The stability really shines in the later miles of long runs when form starts to fade. Compared to my old Nimbus 25s, the ride is slightly firmer but more responsive. Used these for my recent Chicago Marathon training and they were perfect for those early morning base-building runs. Only issue is some irritation around the tongue on runs over 2 hours, but proper sock choice helps.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
I’ve put about 200 miles on my Gel Nimbus 27s and can confidently say these are excellent daily trainers. The cushioning is plush yet responsive – perfect for my long runs up to 18 miles. I particularly love how stable they feel compared to my old Nike Invincibles. The upper does have some hotspots near the tongue as mentioned in the review, but this improved after breaking them in. I’ve used these for everything from recovery runs to marathon training and they’ve held up great. The ride is noticeably smoother than the 26, though not dramatically different. For reference, I’m a neutral runner, 165 lbs, averaging 40 mpw.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Just tried these on after putting some serious miles in the 26s. Not really feeling the new upper – seems like a step sideways rather than forward. Anyone else think $175 is a bit much when the Brooks Glycerin is doing the same thing for less?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Dropped by Fleet Feet to check these out – definitely feels cushier than my old 26s but man, that upper is pretty stiff right out of the box. Hoping it softens up with some miles. Kind of hard to justify the price when the Ghost 15 is like $40 cheaper though.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
After 200 miles in the Nimbus 27, I’m thoroughly impressed with the cushioning and stability. Used these for my recent marathon training block, including a successful 3:45 finish at Chicago. The plush upper really shines on those long runs, though I did experience some friction near the heel collar initially. Compared to the 26, the ride feels very similar – perhaps too similar given the price point. The stability is exceptional for a neutral shoe, better than my previous Hoka Bondi 8. While it’s not the most exciting shoe, it’s incredibly reliable for high mileage.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Getting ready for my first full marathon and eyeing these for training. Anyone else with the Cumulus who switched to these? I’m a size 9 in those but heard these run small. Also wondering how the cushioning holds up over heavy training – planning on hitting 45-50 mile weeks!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
After putting 200 miles on the Gel Nimbus 27, I can confidently say it’s a solid daily trainer. The cushioning hits a sweet spot – plush enough for recovery runs but still responsive when picking up the pace. I used these for my recent marathon training block and they performed well on everything from easy miles to 20-milers. The stability is noticeably better than the Saucony Triumph 21 I was using before. My only gripe is some irritation around the collar on longer runs. Still, a great choice for neutral runners looking for a reliable workhorse.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Coming from the Nimbus 25, I noticed the upper does have some friction points near the collar. Definitely try before buying. Local store had these next to the Glycerin 21 – very similar feel but the Glycerin seemed softer. Might stick with my 25s until these go on sale.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Just tried these for the first time since I got a good deal on them and I must say I’m impressed. I normally run in stability shoes but I’ve had no problem with these so far and I’ve put around a hundred miles on them so far. Fit very well and feel very cushioned and stable. Got my size 10.5 as opposed to a size 11 that I normally get in the Asics Kayano. Not as firm as the Kayano which I expect since not a stability shoe but for a stable neutral shoe works well for this old 70 year old runner that needs all the joint protection I can get.
4 months ago
The Nimbus 27 continues to impress after 180 miles of training. I use these primarily for long runs and recovery days, including several 18+ milers in marathon prep. The FFBlast+ cushioning hits a sweet spot between comfort and responsiveness that previous versions missed. Stability is exceptional – no issues even when fatigue sets in late in long runs. Compared to the Nimbus 26, the upper is more refined though I did experience some heel collar irritation initially. These feel more versatile than my Brooks Glycerin 20 but not quite as plush as the New Balance 1080v13. For pure comfort and reliability in high mileage training, they’re hard to beat. Finished a 20-miler last weekend feeling fresh.
4 months ago
Ready to pull the trigger on the Nimbus 27 but stressing about size. My Nikes are 8.5 but heard ASICS can be tricky. Anyone else switch from Nike? Also wondering how cushy these are compared to the Glycerin 21 – those were my previous go-to for long runs.
4 months ago
Asics US 9.5 Nimbus is the same as Nike 9.5 (Pegasus, Zoom Fly, Vaporfly all fit the same) for me. I have heel lock problem with Nike Invincible 3 though.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.5 months ago
The Nimbus 27 has proven to be an exceptional daily trainer over my 200-mile testing period. The FFBlast+ cushioning provides excellent impact protection while maintaining enough responsiveness for uptempo days. I’ve used it for everything from recovery runs to a recent half marathon. The upper irritation mentioned in the cons was noticeable initially but disappeared after breaking in. Compared to the Nimbus 26, the improvements are subtle but welcome – particularly the smoother transition. The stability is impressive for such a cushioned shoe, making it perfect for those final miles of long runs when form deteriorates. While pricey at $165, the versatility and durability make it worth the investment.