If you’re looking for a shoe that can handle most types of runs, this is a great shoe. Beginner runners will love this shoe as an all-around shoe that can provide great cushion and a smooth ride. Intermediate to advanced runners will likely use this for easy and long run days. Most runners will be able to use this for some uptempo days – think marathon paced runs.
If you have had issues with a high heel tab, then this shoe will likely rub on your ankles. If you’re looking for a highly durable shoe, I’m not sure this shoe will last given the outsole.
For this edition, Asics decided to change the midsole and the heel flare from the last edition while also dropping some weight. The upper had some slight redesigns, mostly in the heel tab area and the tongue. Finally, the outsole was changed to a new Fluidride™ technology that claims to enhance comfort and traction.
The changes in this shoe helps to distinguish it from both the Gel-Nimbus and the Novablast in the Asics lineup.
The Gel-Nimbus is definitely more plush feeling and has a greater outsole grip, which ultimately screams premium.
The Novablast is firmer and designed for faster runs.
The Gel-Cumulus tries to fit somewhere in between – attempting to give the runner something that has soft cushion but enough of a ride to help with those uptempo efforts.
The Cumulus shares a similar midsole and tongue while the rocker technology is what helps the slightly more uptempo efforts.
When I first opened this box, I was impressed by the colorway and stylistic design of the shoe overall. It just looked sleek and comfortable.
It felt lightweight in my hands and all the above was confirmed when I first put it on my feet. My first run in the shoe was an easy recovery run.
This shoe didn’t have all the soft cushion I wanted in a recovery run but I could feel the rocker technology propel me forward on a day that I didn’t have any propulsion my own. It was very nice.
My next run was a long run. Again, it felt like I was gliding. There is an energy return to this shoe but it’s not as pronounced as I thought the Gel-Nimbus was.
The upper of the shoe felt great but I wasn’t impressed with the tongue. I had to get used to tucking it under so it was flush against my ankle.
The tongue is partially gusseted and feels as soft as the rest of the shoe, though I had struggles initially keeping it flat on my ankle when I would initially put it on.
My only issue with rubbing came on the back of my ankle from the higher heel counter. I didn’t have issues during my first long run but did on my second.
If you don’t respond well to higher heel counters, this shoe could potentially be a problem for you.
The lacing system was fine and the laces stayed tied without a double knot during all my runs.
Overall, the shoe fit true to size for me. This shoe does come in wide widths options.
For those that are Eco-conscious, the development of the FF Blast™ foam helps reduce the shoe’s carbon footprint by 25%.
The heel drop is 8mm, with a height of about 38.5mm in the heel and 30mm in the forefoot. It’s a lower stack height than the Gel-Nimbus and it’s quite noticeable. The rocker technology in this shoe is noticeable as well.
The sockliner is very soft and makes your foot feel like it’s wrapped.
One upgrade in this version compared to Cumulus 25 is the Fluidride™ outsole.
It helps the shoe feel lighter and supports the transition from heel to toe very well. I have seen a good amount of wear and tear, though, after about 60 miles on the shoes.
I don’t think this will be as durable as some other shoes with different outsole rubber but it likely fits in line with most daily trainers.
The grip was ok on wet surfaces and gravel surfaces. I generally will keep this shoe to dry, smooth roads only and look for other shoes if I know I will be on some grass, gravel, or wet roads.
Overall, the Cumulus 26 is a very good daily trainer that allows for some uptempo efforts.
For all levels of runners, I can see this shoe being a great trainer for marathon and half marathon training as it allows for some of those uptempo efforts while still staying true to the daily, easy miles.
For those concentrating on 5k-10k distances, this is a great daily miles trainer.
At the $140 price point, I think it is a fair price to pay for daily trainer that will log a good amount of miles at various paces.
1 day ago
Just swung by my running shop to check out the new Cumulus. Been running in these since version 22 and wow, that rocker geometry is way more noticeable now! Tried on the Nimbus 26 too – pretty similar feel but the Cumulus is definitely lighter. Still on the fence about paying the extra cash over the GT-2000 though, especially since these are just my easy day shoes.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 week ago
The Cumulus 26 has been my go-to shoe for the past month, covering about 120 miles so far. The rocker geometry creates an incredibly smooth ride that’s perfect for daily training. Compared to the 25, the cushioning feels more balanced and responsive. I’ve used them for both easy runs and progression runs up to marathon pace. While the heel tab caused some irritation initially, wearing longer socks solved the issue. The biggest improvement is the lighter weight – makes it much more versatile than previous versions. Durability seems solid except for some minor outsole wear.
2 months ago
Total newbie here starting Couch to 5K! Looking at these since my regular Nikes aren’t cutting it anymore. Anyone use these for beginning running? My neighborhood’s all sidewalks and I’m only doing about 30 mins, 3 times a week right now. BTW – wear size 10 in my regular shoes… should I size up?
2 months ago
Thinking about switching from Brooks to ASICS for my easy miles. Got slightly wider feet – anyone know how these compare to the Ghost’s fit? Also, I do about 30-40 miles per week – wondering how long these typically last before the cushioning dies?
2 months ago
I can’t really comment on the durability as I’m still around 70 miles on the shoes. They’re still holding up well but that’s really to be expected with that little amount of mileage. No obvious signs of wear/tear. In terms of fit, I’ve tried this and The Ghost 16. I think the Ghost might fit better for someone who has a slightly wider foot. I am sort of in that range as you would never call my foot narrow but Wide shoes are too wide for me.
4 months ago
I found the toe box a little tight for my liking, but the cushioning is fantastic. Every step feels soft and stable, and the transitions are smooth. These are great for recovery runs, but I wouldn’t use them for anything too speedy. Also, I wish they had more breathability in the upper, especially during warm days.
6 months ago
How does the Gel-Cumulus 26 compare to the Gel-Nimbus line when it comes to cushioning? I’m looking for a shoe that offers a plush feel for long runs but also some responsiveness.
6 months ago
I think the cushioning is likely softer on the Nimbus. There’s definitely a higher stack height there. I like the rocker and ride of the Cumulus but the Nimbus is a more max cushioned shoe in comparison.