Comparison:
ASICS Cumulus vs ASICS Kayano
Cumulus is ASICS's midrange daily training running shoe, while the Kayano is a premium stability shoe. What's the difference?
Comparison:
The ASICS Gel-Kayano and ASICS Gel-Cumulus are two standout models in ASICS' running lineup, each aimed at different types of runners.
The Kayano is known for its stability features, while the Cumulus offers a more versatile, cushioned ride.
In this comparison, we’ll break down their key differences in the sole unit, upper design, and overall performance. Let’s dive in and see which one might suit your running needs better.
Similarity and differences: Gel Cumulus 27 vs Gel Kayano 32
Expert score
7/10
10/10
Weight
9.2 oz
10.5 oz
Heel Drop
8 mm
8 mm
Verdict
The Asics Gel-Cumulus 27 is a cushioned daily trainer that can be used as an everyday training shoe for most runners of all abilities. While very little has changed in terms of the composition of the shoe, this year’s shoe felt a little flatter and less useful for anything past an easy run. If you can find the 26 on discount anywhere, I’d lean in that direction before upgrading to this new version.
What it is: Overall, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 is a refined stability trainer that delivers plush comfort, reliable support, and a smoother, lighter ride. With its responsive midsole, secure upper, and durable outsole, it offers a versatile and dependable option for daily miles and long-distance training.
Verdict: I enjoyed running in the Kayano 32 across everything from easy recovery miles to longer tempo runs. The small refinements—slimmer midsole, more responsive FlyteFoam Blast+ Eco, and adaptive upper—felt profound, enhancing the shoe’s overall versatility. My only minor gripe was the slightly reduced breathability could feel limiting on hotter days. Still, the Kayano 32 is capable of carrying you through all of your training, whether your next race is a 5K or a 50K.
Recommended for
Daily training
Daily training
Cushioning type
Balanced/plush
Balanced/plush
Cushioning amount
Medium cushioning
Highly cushioned
Flexibility
rigid
medium
Stability
some stability
very stable
Sizing
true to size
true to size
Retail price
US$139.95
US$164.95
Sole unit: Gel Cumulus 27 vs Gel Kayano 32
The Gel-Kayano is built with stability in mind, making it a good choice for runners who over-pronate. It features Asics’ 4D Guidance System and FF Blast+ cushioning, which provide a solid, supportive platform. The higher stack height (40 mm in the heel, 30 mm in the forefoot) offers substantial cushioning and feels stable but slightly heavy for some runners. It’s well-suited for those longer runs where extra support helps keep your form in check.
On the other hand, the Gel-Cumulus is more about balance and flexibility. It’s equipped with FF Blast+ ECO foam and PureGel in the heel, offering a cushioned yet responsive feel. The stack height is slightly lower (34 mm in the heel, 26 mm in the forefoot), making it feel lighter and more agile. This setup is ideal for neutral runners who want a shoe that works well for both easy runs and picking up the pace when needed.
To sum up, if stability and support are your top priorities, especially for longer distances, the Kayano is a solid option. If you’re looking for something lighter with a touch more versatility, the Cumulus might be a better fit.
Upper unit: Gel Cumulus 27 vs Gel Kayano 32
In terms of upper design, the Gel-Kayano uses a structured engineered mesh that gives a snug, supportive fit. This is especially beneficial for those who need stability, as it helps keep the foot locked in place during the run. The design focuses on security without sacrificing comfort, but it can feel a bit bulkier.
The Gel-Cumulus, however, features a stretchy engineered mesh that offers a softer, more flexible fit. It feels lighter on the foot and adapts well to different foot shapes.
In short, if you prefer a snug, more structured upper, the Kayano delivers that stability-focused fit. If you lean toward a softer, more flexible feel, the Cumulus offers a more adaptable upper design.
Which one to buy: Gel Cumulus 27 vs Gel Kayano 32
If you’re someone who benefits from stability—perhaps you overpronate or run long distances—the Gel-Kayano is designed with you in mind. It provides the support and cushioning you need to maintain good form over extended miles, though it may feel a bit bulkier.
For those who prefer a neutral, cushioned shoe that can handle a variety of runs, the Gel-Cumulus is more versatile. It’s lighter, more flexible, and can easily transition between different paces. This makes it a good all-around option for daily training without the added structure of the Kayano.
In conclusion, the Kayano is the right pick for runners needing stability, while the Cumulus is a great choice for those wanting a lighter, more versatile trainer.
Best price online: Gel Cumulus 27 vs Gel Kayano 32
This expert review is written by
Ruggero Loda
Founder and Publisher, Running Shoes Guru
Ruggero is the founder and publisher of Running Shoes Guru. After years of experience working for brands such as Nike, Reebok/Adidas, Ruggero launched Running Shoes Guru in 2009 because he could not find a reliable, independent and trusted source of running shoe reviews elsewhere on the internet.A runner and triathlete, Ruggero has tested dozens of shoes over more than 15 years. He is an advocate for transparency and that's why he purchases all shoes for testing with his own money instead of
