If you’re looking for a shoe that for your everyday miles at a good price point, you should look no further. Beginner runners will love this shoe as an all-around shoe that can provide great cushion and a soft, smooth ride. Intermediate to advanced runners will likely use this for easy and long run days.
If you need a shoe to also accommodate some faster runs, I would avoid this shoe. If you’re looking for a highly durable shoe, I’m not sure this shoe will last given the outsole.
Now in its 27th edition, the Gel-Cumulus continues to be one of the longest tenured running shoes in the Asics lineup.
For this edition, Asics changed very little. The shoe added a little bit of weight (0.2 oz), changed the materials from which the upper was made, and reduced the height of the heel collar while also adding a pull tab.
For those new to the Cumulus lineup, the shoe fits as a mid-tier training shoe. The more maximalist shoe in the Asics lineup is the Gel-Nimbus as it is much softer, plusher, and includes much more of the premium materials.
The Novablast sits adjacent to the Cumulus but tends to be more versatile as it can be used for some more uptempo runs. In all, the Cumulus is a workhorse mileage shoe that nearly every runner can find some benefit.
When I first opened this box, the first thing I noticed was the continued lightweight feel of the shoe. The colorway was not the most impressive.
My first run in the shoe was an easy 7 mile run in the rain. The shoe did the job as expected from a ride standpoint and exceeded my expectations from a traction standpoint. No irritation, soft ride, and comfort throughout all 7 of those miles and I had zero concerns with my footing.
Having tested the Cumulus 26, this shoe didn’t feel like it had the same rocker as the previous version even though the basics of the shoe remained the same.
My next run was tempo/threshold run (think somewhere in the marathon/10k pace range). This shoe didn’t really help me much in those runs and I also felt like it was holding me back. This is where last year’s version had a bit of a rocker to it and seemed to help propel me forward some. This year, the shoe felt flat and was preventing me from pushing faster.
The upper on this shoe was the biggest change of all. While last year’s shoe was an engineered mesh, this year’s update sees smaller mesh holes and a slight bit less breathability.
The tongue also changed as last year was soft and stretchy knit while this model is now a stiffer, less stretchy mesh.
I didn’t have any issues with hot spots or rubbing in any parts of the upper and the laces stayed tied on a single knot for over 50 miles.
There is a new tab on the heel counter that helps with getting the shoe on and off.
Overall, the shoe fit true to size for me. This shoe does come in wide widths options.
The midsole of the shoe has remained unchanged from last year’s version. There is the PureGel™ in the heel surrounded by the FF Blast™ PLUS foam. According to Asics, the heel drop is 8mm, with a height of about 38.5mm in the heel and 30mm in the forefoot.
The sockliner is made from OrthoLite X-30 and is very soft. It’s comfortable when you’re running in it and the shoe does disappear on your feet for all of those easier miles. The shoe does not seem to give as much energy return as last year’s shoe even though they are supposed to be made similarly. It felt flat to me whenever I tried to pick up the pace.
The outsole remains made from Fluidride™ which helps keep the shoe lightweight. While the shoe seemingly gained a very small amount of weight from last year, it was negligible in my comparison of the two shoes.
I did not see the same wear on the outsole as I did on last year’s shoe. The traction was great even on multiple wet runs. This was an upgrade compared to last year’s outsole.
Overall, the Cumulus 27 is a very good daily trainer that will allow you to eat up lots of easy miles. It stops short of being able to be used for more uptempo efforts.
It’s a shoe for all level of runners and the $140 price point is a fair deal. If you’ve loved the Cumulus over the years, I feel like this shoe lives up to the standards of the Cumulus. If you see the 26 on sale somewhere, I think that’s more worthwhile to snatch up.
1 week ago
Getting back into running after having my second kid and need new shoes. Torn between these and the Pegasus 40. My old Cumulus 26s were great but a bit snug in the toes. Anyone tried both? I do about 20 miles a week, mostly on roads with some treadmill runs.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 weeks ago
Having logged 200 miles in the Cumulus 27 over the past three months, I can say it’s a solid daily trainer. While it excels as an easy day shoe with its soft, comfortable ride, I’ve noticed the flatter feel compared to the 26. The lightweight design is appreciated during longer runs, but I find myself reaching for other shoes when doing tempo work or intervals. Used these for my recent half marathon training block – great for recovery runs but less versatile than previous versions. The cushioning hits a nice sweet spot for daily miles, though the transition does feel a bit clunky. When compared to similar neutral trainers like the Brooks Ghost, these feel less versatile but more affordable. I’d give them a solid recommendation for easy day mileage.
3 weeks ago
I’ve tested the Cumulus 27 for over 150 miles now. The FF Blast+ cushioning feels softer than version 26, especially in the forefoot. Perfect for my daily 5-7 mile runs at easy pace. The engineered mesh upper breathes well and provides good lockdown. Durability has been excellent – barely any wear on the outsole. While it’s true they’re not great for speed work, that’s not what they’re designed for. Compared to my old Nimbus 25s, these feel lighter and more agile while still providing enough cushioning. Did a 15-mile long run in them last weekend with no issues. For pure easy day comfort, these are hard to beat.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
The Cumulus 27 has been my go-to shoe for the past three months, logging about 200 miles so far. The cushioning sweet spot really shows on my easy 5-7 mile runs, though I notice the flatness mentioned in the review during longer efforts. The upper comfort is exceptional – no hot spots or blisters even on humid days. I’m coming from the Brooks Ghost 15 and find these lighter and more responsive, though less plush. They’ve performed well on both roads and light trails, with particularly good traction in wet conditions. My only complaint mirrors the review – they don’t have enough pop for tempo work. For daily training at easy to moderate paces though, they’re nearly perfect.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.