If you really liked the ride of the Mach 4, 5 or Supersonic, but you don’t like the Mach 6, the Rincon 4 is a great alternative.
If you’re looking for an affordable trainer with a firm ride, the Rincon 4 is a great choice.
If you have very wide feet, the Rincon 4’s narrow upper will feel uncomfortable.
If you’re looking for a soft, squishy trainer with high energy return, the Rincon 4 is also not for you.
Back in 2019, before the Mach series became the powerhouse that it is today, the Rincon was the default, lightweight speed trainer in the Hoka lineup. The plated Mach X didn’t exist back then, so when you wanted to do your speed training, you reached for the Rincon. Those who found the Clifton/Bondi too heavy or too arch-intruding, used the Rincon as their daily trainer.
Since then, the Rincon has fallen out of favour at Hoka. Complaints of the Rincon’s short cushioning lifespan and rapid outsole degradation resulted in Hoka putting the Rincon on the back burner- this, in combination with the rise in popularity of the Mach series.
3 years ago, in 2021, the Rincon 3 was launched. It’s been 2 Rincon-less years since then. Now, Hoka has decided to bring the Rincon back. It’s no longer classified as a speed trainer but a lightweight daily trainer. The Mach 6 (which is now a Hoka bestseller) is still the flagship, plateless lightweight, speed trainer.
So why has Hoka decided to bring the Rincon back? It could be due to popular demand or it could be that because the latest version of the Mach (6th version) has changed so much, they want to offer a trainer which resembles the previous versions of the Mach, which were immensely popular.
The 2024 Rincon 4 is unrecognisable and it resembles the Mach 4/5 more than any previous Rincon version. The biggest change is that it now has a full-length, rubberised EVA outsole, similar to the Mach 4, 5 and Supersonic versions.
The Rincon 4 weighs 8 oz (227 g) in a men’s US 9. This is 0.6 oz (17 g) heavier than the Rincon 3. It has gained 3 extra mm of stack height in the heel and the forefoot. Its price has remained at $125 (the same as in 2021), which is an impressive feat.
The ride didn’t feel like any previous Rincon. It felt very familiar though and it reminded me of the Hoka Mach Supersonic. The ride was relatively firm (for Hoka) but buttery smooth.
It definitely felt like a lightweight, tempo trainer; not a daily trainer, like Hoka says, due to the firmness of the ride. It felt firmer than the Mach 6, Clifton 9 and the Mach X.
The Rincon’s upper is a snug, speed fit. It has a very thin, engineered jacquard upper with outstanding airflow and it has ventilation holes across the toe-box for better breathability.
Unfortunately, the padded tongue is not gusseted but I didn’t notice any tongue slide thanks to the lace loop in the middle of the tongue that holds it in place.
There are reflective panels at the first 2 eyelets as well as on the top of the toe-box for low-light visibility.
The Rincon 4 has a very narrow forefoot and toe-box typical of Hokas, so most runners will need to go up a half size or get the wide version. It’s also a tad shorter in length than most running shoes. I don’t recommend it for wide feet.
The majority of the Rincon 4 reviews on the Hoka website are negative. Most people complain about the firm ride and the tight fit. They also say that the Rincon 4 is nothing like the Rincon 3.
I agree that the ride is firm but I don’t mind the firm ride. That’s what sets the Rincon 4 apart from the Mach 6 and the other trainers like the Clifton 9. This shoe is for runners who want something light and firm that feels fast. Hoka has plenty of other soft trainers to choose from.
Hoka states that it’s an injected EVA foam in the Rincon 4. This is one step down from the supercritical midsole of the Mach 6 which has more compression and more rebound. The Rincon 4 midsole is denser and doesn’t feel as lively or energetic as the Mach 6. The midsole does however feel more responsive than versions 1, 2 and 3 of the Rincon.
With 36 mm stack height in the heel and 31 mm in the forefoot, the Rincon 4 has substantial cushioning, however the stack heights feel much lower when you’re running in it due to its firm ride.
The longest run I did in the Rincon 4 was 38 kilometres. It had enough cushioning and the ride was stable enough however I would have preferred a shoe with a bigger forefoot rocker to make it feel more efficient. Hoka advertises that it has a MetaRocker but it’s not very prominent compared to their other trainers.
The Rincon 4 is best suited to short or middle distance runs however, if you’re used to firm rides, you could use it for long runs too. It feels most comfortable doing steady-paced runs. It’s too firm for easy/recovery runs while it lacks the energy return and speed assistance for tempo runs or anything faster. There’s no stiffening device in its midsole so it has a flexible forefoot with a natural ride.
The Rincon 4’s rubberised EVA outsole is twice the thickness of regular outsoles. This is necessary because of how fast it wears down. There is noticeable wear on my pair on the outer lateral heel areas.
If you’re hard on outsoles, and you want a shoe that lasts a long time, the Rincon 4 might not be the ideal shoe for you but I have noticed that the outsole wear isn’t as bad as versions 1, 2 and 3. Those versions had more midsole foam exposed on their outsoles.
As you’d expect from an outsole so smooth, traction is not very good on wet, smooth surfaces. Traction is fine on dry surfaces.
While the Rincon 4 doesn’t have the fun factor that other modern, more energetic Hoka trainers have, its price is significantly lower and it has remained the same as 3 years ago, when most shoes have increased in price. At only $125, the Rincon 4 represents great value and it doesn’t feel like a budget trainer.
The firm ride and weight increase might be off-putting for runners who were fans of the previous Rincon versions. Its upper is also less accommodating. It does however feel more responsive and more polished than previous versions so in my opinion, it’s the best Rincon to date. It feels more like previous versions of the Mach than previous versions of the Rincon.
At only 8 oz (227 g), the Rincon 4 is super light for a daily trainer. It’s lighter than the Clifton 9, Mach 6 and a lot lighter than the Skyflow and Bondi. This makes it feel nimbler than most of Hoka’s behemoth trainers.
1 day ago
Looking to add these to my rotation but heard they changed up the foam. Anyone run in both these and the Mach 6? My last pair of Rincons only lasted 200 miles before the outsole was toast – hoping the new design holds up better!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 weeks ago
Just tried these on at Fleet Feet – man, they really slimmed down the fit from the 3s! My wide feet aren’t too happy about that, but that cushioning feels amazing. Been eyeing the Cliftons too, but for $50 less, these might be the better deal for my easy day shoes. Anyone else with wider feet make these work?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Just logged 200 miles in the Rincon 4 and I’m really impressed. Loving the extra cushioning compared to my old v3s! Been using these for pretty much everything – easy days, tempos, you name it. They’re not as springy as my Mach 6s, but honestly that firmer feel is perfect for steady runs. Big plus: they’re holding up way better than my previous pairs – usually my Rincons would look beat up by now. Had to go up half a size though since they run narrow. Knocked out several 10-milers and a half in these. For $125, definitely worth it even if they’re a tad heavier than before.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Been crushing my daily miles in the Rincon 4s for three months now (around 200 miles total). You really notice that extra cushion compared to the 3s – feels way more protective. Super impressed with the outsole durability – my old pairs would be showing major wear by now, but these still look fresh! They’re perfect for my usual 5-7 mile runs at easy pace. Took them through a half marathon and while they were solid, my Mach 6s definitely have more pop for race day. Quick heads up on sizing – had to bump up from 8 to 8.5 cause they run narrow. Sweet spot is definitely those easy-moderate paces around 8-9 min/mile. Best part? They’re a steal at $125 compared to other shoes in this category. Just wish they had a bit more bounce for tempo days.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
After putting 200 miles on the Rincon 4, I can confidently say it’s a solid daily trainer. The increased stack height is noticeable – my legs feel fresher on longer runs compared to the Rincon 3. The rubberized EVA outsole is a huge improvement in durability; my previous Rincons showed wear much faster. While it lacks the springy feel of my Mach 6s, the firmer ride works well for steady-state runs around marathon pace. I’ve used these for everything from easy 5-milers to 18-mile long runs. The narrow fit takes some getting used to, but the upper breaks in nicely. At $125, it’s one of the best value propositions in running shoes right now.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
My Cliftons are getting worn out and thinking about adding Rincons to the mix. Anyone else use both? My Cliftons are perfect in 10.5 but heard Rincons fit differently. Also kinda worried about durability – my running buddy burned through his Rincon 3s pretty quick. How’s the new outsole holding up?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
My Mach 6s are great but I need something lighter for my Tuesday track sessions and tempo runs. Anyone using the Rincon 4 for speedwork? Bit worried about durability after reading some reviews. Also got slightly wide feet – currently wearing my Mach 6 in wide. Should I look at something else or will these work?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Hey runners! Looking to try my first pair of Hokas after being a Pegasus loyalist forever. Currently wear size 8 in Pegs – any Rincon owners out there who made the same switch? Heard they run narrow. Also, my friend swears by her Clifton 9s – anyone able to compare the cushioning between these two?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
I’ve put these through their paces with 175 miles of mixed running, including a half marathon PR. The increased stack height is noticeable compared to my old Rincon 3s – much more protected feel on longer runs. The rubberized EVA outsole is a game-changer for durability; my previous Rincons showed significant wear by this point. While they lack the springiness of my Mach 6s, they’re perfect for steady-state runs and daily training. The narrow fit works for my feet but might be problematic for others. Used these for a recent 10-mile race and they performed admirably. At $125, they’re an excellent value for a versatile trainer, though I do wish they had more energy return for race day.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Finally grabbed these on clearance at REI – sweet deal at $99! Been a Clifton fan forever but these feel way different. Super snug in the midfoot compared to my usual trail shoes. Might keep them just for track days instead of hitting the trails. Anyone else find them narrow?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
My budget’s tight but need new daily trainers – how do these compare to Cliftons? Got wider feet and had issues with Hokas before. Doing mostly easy miles (25-30 mpw) and some light gym work. Anyone use these for both running and cross-training? Love cushioned shoes but worried these might be too firm based on the reviews.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Anyone with wide feet try these yet? My Rincon 3s fit perfectly but I’m worried about the new narrow fit I keep hearing about. Training for a half marathon and need something that won’t squeeze my toes during those long runs. Also wondering if they’re still snappy enough for tempo days with the extra weight?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Thinking about taking the Hoka plunge with these – anyone with wider feet have experience? My local store doesn’t stock them. Also saw some reviews mentioning quick wear on the outsole. How many miles are you all getting out of them?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Training for my first half and trying to decide if these would work for me. I’ve got the Cliftons now but they feel a bit bulky. Anyone with narrow feet tried these? Also kinda worried about dropping $125 if they’re gonna wear out before race day – how many miles are you all getting out of them?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Need a lighter shoe for my tempo days and 5K races. Anyone put serious miles on these yet? My last pair of Hokas ran pretty narrow and wore down quick, wondering if these are any different? Really want to love them but worried about dropping the cash if they’ll only last a couple months.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Been rotating the Rincon 4 into my training for about 2 months now. The extra stack height is noticeable – feels more substantial than the 3 while maintaining good ground feel. I’ve found it ideal for steady-state runs between 8:00-8:30 pace. The rubberized EVA outsole is a huge improvement – my previous Rincons wore down quickly but these still look great after 150 miles. While not as bouncy as my Mach 6, they’re perfect for days when I want a firmer, more connected feel. The narrow fit is still there – had to go up half a size. Great value at $125 compared to other premium trainers.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Been running in the Rincon 4 for three months now, primarily for tempo runs and race training. The increased stack height really makes a difference compared to version 3 – I’m getting much better protection on longer runs. Used these for a recent half marathon PR and they felt great throughout. While they’re firmer than my Cliftons, I actually prefer this for faster paces. The rubberized EVA outsole is definitely more durable than previous versions – mine show minimal wear after 150 miles. Agree about the narrow fit though – had to size up a half size. For the price point, these are an excellent choice for someone wanting a versatile trainer.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Ready to try my first Hokas but torn between these and the Cliftons. I do about 20-25 miles a week, mostly easy runs with some tempo work. Been reading about the narrow fit and getting nervous – my feet are slightly wide. Anyone make the switch from traditional shoes to these? Worth sizing up?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.8 months ago
Thanks for the detailed review! Do you think the Rincon 4 would hold up well for someone training for a marathon, or is it better suited for shorter runs?
7 months ago
Hi Lana. Yes, you can use it for marathon training. It has a relatively firm ride compared to other trainers but if you like a firm ride, you can definitely use it.
10 months ago
I just got the Rincon 4 after reading this review, and I agree with most points! The shoe feels really light, but I’m noticing some early wear on the outsole after just a few weeks of training. The cushioning is great for tempo runs, though, so it’s kind of a trade-off. If you’re looking for something to race in that won’t weigh you down, this is an option worth considering.
10 months ago
Great review! How do the Rincon 4s compare to the Clifton 8s when it comes to cushioning and long-distance comfort? I’d love to hear your thoughts, especially for marathon training.