Asics GT 2170 First Impressions:
What’s old is new again with the Asics GT 2170. Being that the 2170 is a core shoe for Asics, I didn’t expect a drastic overhaul for the 2170 and I was pretty much right. The heel looks a little different on the 2170 and it is truly a pleasant shoe when you first try it on. The 2150 was the last GT series shoe that I ran in and it too was a fine shoe. The 2170 continues to offer high end cushioning and moderate stability combined with a fit and function that thousands of runners call home.
Asics GT 2170 Upper:
Asics continues to play it safe with the 2170 upper. And why not? It’s a well designed unit consisting of very breathable mesh and supportive, yet soft, overlays. I did notice that the eyelet row has been segmented a bit in order to help the upper conform to the foot in motion. Most notable to me is the Asics PHF (Personalized Heel Fit) design which provides a very plush and comfortable heel fit. The heel counter is quite rigid as it should be in a stability shoe. The collar height is very low and provides a good fit. At first, I felt like I was slipping a touch in the heel area but that sensation soon abated. Asics uses a very slick, finely woven material inside their shoes and when combined with technical socks the heel fit can slide a little for the first couple of runs.
Asics GT 2170 Sole Unit:
As in the upper, Asics has made few sweeping changes to the 2170. GT series fans will still find the same Duomax medial posting, SoLyte midsole foam and Impact Guidance System (IGS). Also included is a substantial Space Trusstic mid foot shank which helps control the torsional forces created by an over pronating foot. Asics relatively new Guidance Line design is also here. Guidance Line carves out a path in the midsole to help the foot travel as neutrally through foot strike as possible. Asics did decide to place more GEL cushioning in the heel area of the 2170. In fact, the GT series has never had this much GEL before.
Asics GT 2170 Opinion:
I truly enjoyed my time in the Asics GT 2170. I took them on both treadmill and asphalt runs and they performed quite reliably and as expected. The GT 2170 has several features that I demand in a stability shoe. First, I must have a shoe with substantial arch support and the 2170 did well in this regard. I’m a light runner but my feet are very flexible and my feet and posterior tibial tendons will quickly tell me if a shoe is weak in the arch. The GT 2170 was adequate in this regard but there were times that I felt a few twinges that tell me I probably would be better off in a shoe with a touch more arch.
The GT 2170 excels at cushioning. The shoe does a superb job of insulating the runner from the road. However, this comes with a trade off in transition. Compared to some other shoes I’ve recently tested, the GT 2170 felt a bit slow and cumbersome when the pace quickened. It is also heavier than many competitors shoes in this category. I weigh every shoe that I test on my kitchen scale and I was surprised to see a 12 ounce weight for this shoe. Overall though, the shoe is well built and the design, even if a little dated, is undeniably successful.
I can’t see any reason why fans of this series will be disappointed in the new GT 2170.
We thank the nice people at Asics for sending us a pair of GT-2170 to test. This did not influence our review, written after running more than 50 miles in them
price comparison
 | Asics Gt-2170 G-tx Men Holabird Sports Free shipping over 69.95$ | $69.95 |
 | Asics - Gt-2170 (electric Blue/white/red) - Footwear Zappos Free shipping both ways (free return shipping), 365 days returns | $79.95 |
 | Men's Asics Gt-2170 Running Shoe - Silver/blue 11.5 RoadRunnerSports Free shipping, 60-day perfect fit guarantee: possible to exchange shoes after using them for two months. | $89.95 |
Written by Theo Clyatt
Theo Clyatt lives in Mississippi and works as an Exercise Physiologist. He and his wife, Melanie, are raising their first child and potential track star, Jackson. His passions outside of running include herding four cats and playing insanely loud electric guitars.
I am curious as to what you mean by ‘would be better off in a shoe with a touch more arch’. I have compartment syndrome in both legs. I typically run half marathon distance, but am currently training for a marathon. I usually run in the 2160′s but decided to give the 2170 a shot. My legs were in significant pain after 3 miles. Can you tell me what type of choes have ‘a touch more arch’?
Thanks,
Teran
It means the arch support sucks. Read this . . . http://drshoe.wordpress.com/2012/02/11/shoe-review-asics-gt-2170-vs-asics-gt-2160/
With respect, the good Doctor’s reviews are kooky at best. I’d take them with a large grain of salt.
Agree 100%, David. She has some very strange opinions indeed.
Teran, I feel your pain-literally! I would look at the Mizuno Wave Nirvana 7 or 8 if you are tackling the marathon distance. It is an incredibly supportive shoe. Another option would be the Mizuno Wave Alchemy 11. Good luck in your marathon and best wishes for a speedy recovery.
Thanks for the question.
Hi Theo. How would you compare the 2170′s forefoot cushion and overall stability to Mizuno’s Inspire 8 & Nirvana 8?
I usually run in Mizunos but find their flex controllers and high degree of toe spring in the latest models flare-up my metatarsalgia. Consequently I’m on the lookout for alternatives. I need a shoe with moderate stability which must have good forefoot cushion.
Steven, The 2170 feels denser in the forefoot than both the Inspire 8 and Nirvana 8, which have a more ‘performance’ oriented feel. As such, the 2170 does not have the fast feeling ride of either Mizuno shoe. Also, it is less stable in the heel than the Mizuno’s but it does provide a pretty solid mid foot and arch. I’d say it’s definitely worth a shot if the current Mizuno line up is not to your liking. Thanks for reading.
Hi Theo,
Thank you very much for the review.
How do you feel about the width of the toe box?
I’m buy shoes 2 sizes bigger because of my unusual width (11 4E instead of 9.5).
Thank you.
Sunny, I would say that the 2170 toe box is of average width.I had no issues with it and I generally prefer a wider toe box like Mizuno uses. Good question!
I am curious to what drastically changed in this shoe that is making my feet and leg hurt so much. I put 40 to 60 miles a week, been loyal to the Asics 2100 series (was on Kayano’s until the 16 where they switched the lacing). I started to swap in the 2170 three weeks ago and all of these pains popped up within my leg and foot. I stay away from the 2170′s for a week and pain is gone. Maybe the added cushioning in the heel is causing it, and I wonder if it’s time to move away from Asics? I’ll give them one more set of runs.
Rich, what shoe were you wearing before the 2170?
Theo, sorry didn’t even noticed that you replied and thanks for the reply. I had been running in the 2160′s since Feb 2011.
An update since: I tried to endure the pain and see if it needed a break in period, but no luck. I went to a good running store in NYC and ended up with the NB 890, off the bat all pain went away. I started to run some new PR’s but found that over 13 miles in a run my feet would slide too much in the toe box and I’ll blister in the middle of the forefoot. I tried the NB 1080 v2 for longer runs with disastrous results ending up with major knee pain. I dropped back to an older pair of the 2160 and no knee pain. So right now, I am swapping in the NB 890′s and Asics 2160′s, with the knowledge that I’ll need new shoes next month before marathon season starts. Maybe Brooks Adrenaline or maybe Asics will change the 2100 series again.
I’ve the same experience with the 2170 recently. I’m running marathon’s (21 already) and since I’ve switched from the 2160 to the 2170 I have on the long runs pain in my knee and in my left leg. When I stay away from the 2170 and switch back to my old shoes 2160 I don’t have any issues. I need to have new shoes but I think it will be no longer the 21xx series any more. Would be nice to see what has been changed in relation to the 2160 serie. My guess is that the stability blocks are softer in the 2170 serie.
I have 2110 and 2160. Now I saw your opinion and can say the same about 2160.
2110 are the best shoes I’ve ever had.
I’ve the same experience with the 2160 you have with 2170.
I ran marathon’s and last half I again ran with the 2110.
I have the same pain in my knee and in my left leg.
After read your statement I am sure I don’t buy any Asisc.
In my Kayano material inside the heel tears though I ran only 270 km.
It looks like a quality quoted at asics company did not have greater importance.
I’ve recently become a runner, and truly enjoy it, I run around 12 miles a week. I was using the Nike Free Run, which I have now learnt is awful for running. After recently UPing my training for my second 5k, and experiencing slight pain in my arch (I have flat feet) I did my research, I decided to get a proper running shoe. Based on lots of running shoe reviews and my overpronating problem I decided on the Acsics GT 2170. It is awful, My feet are in unbearable pain after just one mile…I’m not sure what to do as I’ve worn it twice. I have no idea if this pain is normal. Anyone have any recommendations?
I feel your Pain Rich!
Newbie,
It sounds like you need to make a stop at your closest running specialty shop where you can be properly fitted for shoes. Otherwise, you could spend a lot of money and endure heart, and foot, ache in the process.
I am in the same exact situation. I did buy the asic 2170 at the running shop after they fitted me for them. I have been walking 24miles per week in Teva. I decided to get running shoes because I felt ready to run. Is there an adjustment period when you switch types of shoes? The asic 2170′s felt great in the store. Walking/running equal lots of foot pain. Will that improve?
Despite a few stress fractures and my recent torn meniscus, I still love my Asics. Don’t think it’s the shoes…probably the increasing age!
I don’t know about these shoes. I have been a loyal asics 2100 series user for several years, but upon purchasing these shoes, I have experienced pain on the balls of my feet, which are making runs over 5 miles almost impossible to complete without walking (and of course that doesn’t necessarily give relief to your feet!). I’m going to go back to my old pair and hope the pain goes away.
Hi Theo, I am trying to make a choice between GT2170 and Kayano 18. I tested both in a shop (just a short try on a treadmill) and my feet say GT2170. On my test I felt like there is no big difference between GT2170 an Kayano18. My only big doubt is for my weight, I’m a 84kg runner. What do you think?
I’m running both shoes at the moment, Black Kayano 18, and Blue/Neon Ltd Edition 2170′s. The 2170′s look cooler, but I prefer the Kayano, a slightly more plush ride, similar in weight. Both great shoes, no doubt. But if I know I’m doing a 5km+ run that day. I pack the Kayano…
I’m an 82kg runner….And I’ve seen the review by the Podiatrist chick on the 2170′s, and I’m not convinced, its just someone else’s opinion.. they’re great shoes.
Davide, if your feet are telling you 2170 then that’s what you should go with. I liked the 2170 better than the Kayano myself.
There is a video for this shoe on youtube done by a podiatrist explaining the differences between the 2170 and the 2160. I had my doubts so I went to the store and took a look for myself. Everything she said about the shoe was true from what I could see. I tried both on and they are completely different feeling shoes. The 2160s were way cheaper being the old version. I’d have paid more for them than the asking price of the new ones. There seems to be a lot of companies these days that are changing the quality of their products while maintaining a similar price. Pretty sneaky if you ask me.
Theo- Just found your website, good info. I’m looking for running shoes for my dad (doesn’t have a computer). He’s run long distance before, wants to stay in Asics Gel (doctor recommended). He’s 76 and mainly treadmill runner now, recently had planter facistis and bone spur surgery. He’s back up to 45 min. on treadmill. He also wears out the outside heel on his shoes (underpronates?). I’m looking at the Asics GT-2170 versus the Asics Gel-Excel 33, cost is not issue. Any thoughts, I’m leaning toward the Gel-Excel. Thanks. Shawn
Hi Shawn, glad you like the site but it’s actually not mine. Runningshoesguru.com is owned by Ruggero Loda who also writes some reviews and is a pretty cool dude.
Now, as far as your dad goes I’m glad he’s doing better as I know what plantar fasciitis is like. It sucks.
Here’s the tricky part…I have no idea what your father’s foot type or gait is so it is incredibly difficult for me to recommended what he should buy. However, in my experience people with PF issues always do best in rigid shoes. That could be a rigid neutral shoe like the Mizuno Wave Creation or Wave Prophecy or it could be a stability shoe like the GT 2170. You really should take your dad to your closest running specialty store and have them fit him for shoes.
Best wishes and let us know what happens!
I have a wide front foot, and always have issues with left foot, small toe hurting in most shoes, this pair included. What can be done or do I need to find a wide toe box shoe? I was running in adidas supernova adapt and they felt fine but are no longer made. Any suggestions? Would a wider shoe with inserts work? or should I be looking for longer shoe so the toe box does not squeeze down?
Larry, have you tried going up in width but staying in the same size?
Hi, I’m a beginner and i’m having a hard time to choose the best shoes. I have hipermobility, i heel strike, i have very low arch, almost flat and i overpronate. So i’ve been looking for the best shoes but i’m stuck between this Asics 2170, Mizuno Nirvana 7 and Asics Kayano 17 (the latest versions of this shoes are extremely expansive in Brazil). I was going for this 2170, but after reading the users comments, i’m cold feet with this shoes. Any thoughts? Could you please help me?? Thanks!
Debora, given the issues you’ve listed I would recommend the Nirvana 7, Alchemy 11 or the Asics Foundation. Good luck in your new running career!
Hello Theo, just found your website – very good, plenty of useful info. I’ve been running for 15 years now, approx. 50 km a week, used all kinds of shoes along the way. And last week I bought ASICS 2170…. The shoe itself is great, lightweight, comfortable, dynamic. However, I’m dismayed with what happens when I actually take it off – the fine delicate lining used on the heel sticks to the sock like velcro, I almost need to tear the sock away from the shoe, afrait it will soon just peel off, or something… Never seen anything like this, even with the previous pair that were ASICS GEL 1150. I use the basic cotton sock, nothing special. What do you think it could be? The PHF system side-effect? Did you notice this as well? Thanks in advance for your opinion! Maciej
Hi Maciej, I’m thrilled that you like the site but I do not own it. Runningshoesguru.com was founded by Ruggero Loda, who has worked in the shoe industry and who was kind enough to invite me to review footwear.
As for your shoe issue, I did not experience that but I also do not wear cotton socks as they have a tendency to become hard and pill up. I would suggest you try a synthetic or wool sock from Drymax, Balega, Swiftwick, etc. as these designs greatly outperform cotton socks. Enjoy!
Thanks for your advice, Theo, I’ll try sinthetic socks then! Hope this will help!
Thanks for your review Theo! I have been a loyal Asics 21xx seriew wearer for the last ~8 years, and have just put in 10 miles on my new 2170′s, and am disappointed. The toe box keeps getting smaller on these–last year they narrowed it in the 2160′s, and now they shortened it and in the 2170 it feels like they narrowed it again a tad. My feet are 6.5 women’s in length, but I have short toes & high arches which pushes me into a 7 usually; I buy a 7.5 in running shoes due to long distance running…and I am not sure that moving up to an 8 is the best answer, just so that my toes don’t suffer when running down hills. Do you have a comparison-opinion between this and previous versions of this shoe? I feel like the 2150 was the last shoe which didn’t squish my toes and give me blisters…yesterday’s 7-mile run in the 2170′s had me stopping to check if my sock had balled up under my toes–but no, that was just my other toes being squished together.
With regard to a previous comment about socks, I have had the same experience and I wear Balega socks–my 2150′s have a hole worn where my heel bone sits, and all of my previous 21xx series shoes have pilled like this. I’ve countered it with using those silicone adhesives…
Thanks for any comments you can make on the changes in the 21xx series over time–I’m considering seeking a new line of shoes at this point, which makes me sad b/c it was nice to always be able to count on Asics and order online without hesitation.
nanders1, the last GT series shoe I ran in was the 2140 and then the 2150. I didn’t really feel there was a drastic difference in the 2170 but it has been a couple of years since I ran the 2150 so bear that in mind.
With the wear in the heel it sounds like you need a narrower heel fit and a wider toebox. Have you tried the new Mizuno Inspire? It fits just as I’ve described and could be just what you’ve been looking for. Mizuno has a ride that is quite different than Asics so be sure and try before you buy. Let us know wha
nanders1, the last GT series shoe I ran in was the 2140 and then the 2150. I didn’t really feel there was a drastic difference in the 2170 but it has been a couple of years since I ran the 2150 so bear that in mind.
With the wear in the heel it sounds like you need a narrower heel fit and a wider toebox. Have you tried the new Mizuno Inspire? It fits just as I’ve described and could be just what you’ve been looking for. Mizuno has a ride that is quite different than Asics so be sure and try before you buy. Let us know what happens and thanks for reading!
I just got these and having hot spots bilateral in the midfoot areA within 25 min in a run.. What should I do?
Patel, I have had that problem before but not with this shoe. Sometimes a shoe will settle in and sometimes it won’t. If your store has a good return policy you could give it another run or two and see what happens. If the hot spots stop, then you’re good. If not, take them back. Good luck and thanks for reading.
I found your site very informative. I’ve never worn Asia’s before; I’ve always favored Nike since I began wearing running shoes and the old air max with the sleeve instead of the tongue. You couldn’t even get me to try a different brand. My orthopedic guy told me I needed a running shoe for people with flat feet. Although I do not have flat feet, I do have a very low arch and am just coming out of a 3 month ride in a urticaria boot due to a severe sprain with significant tendo damage. I looked at this website and went shoe shopping. When I couldn’t find the Nike trial I went for the Ascics Gt 2170 per this site. I tried a number of running shoes today, but I am pleased to say one gave me the arch support of the Ascics GT 2170. Thanks for the info. My foot feels so stable that I’m no longer afraid to walk without the surgical boot.
I went to a running store and got measured up properly, i decided from the advice i was given to go with the Ascis 2170.
my feet feel great in them and running was a pleasure for the first 80km, all of a sudden i started getting blisters on both feet under the arches.
i do not understand, i wear the same socks, run he same amount, at the same pace and after 80 km of running in them they start to give me blisters.
Very disappointed, don’t know what to do, keep on running in them or buy new shoes
Sounds like the upper could have stretched out leaving you too much room inside the shoe. Unfortunately, it happens sometimes. Could be that you would do better in a narrower shoe such as the Mizuno Inspire 8 or the Nike Structure 15. Keep us updated and thanks for the comment.
Matthew, I have very high arches when no weight is placed on my heels (sitting) and completely flat feet when standing. So I get blisters on my instep all the time. I have a few things you can try that work for me: 1) Wright double-layer blister socks, 2) Body Glide, and 3) Band-Aids. The cheapest and always reliable of these solutions is Band-Aids. I put them on just about every time I run. It happens most when I’m just breaking in new shoes, and usually my feet will toughen up over time.
I bought the 2170′s this weekend and wore them on a 3.5 mile run today. So far, I’m loving them! I have Morton’s neuroma on my left foot (pain between the third and fourth toes just in front of the ball of the foot), and it seemed a little less with these shoes. About a year ago, I had switched from Asics (which I have always run in) to Brooks because they were cheaper, but I’m thinking now that the Brooks may have caused the condition. If I have less or no pain by switching to Asics, it’s well worth the higher price! I’ll try another short run tomorrow and then a 10-12 miler on Wed to see how these do. I’m hopeful!
Hey, love this site, it totally helps a beginner figure out all this shoe science and what to get.
Me and my mom are both getting running shoes, we are both overweight and therefore need cushioning shoes (slight knee problems with both of us). We both overpronate even tho our arches are fairly average, hers a bit lower than mine tho.
We went to a running store nearby us, we live in iceland, to get fitted and for some advice. We were adviced to go for stabelising og support shoes with cushioning. I then went online to do some research and amongst other things came here.
We want to buy online since it’s cheaper and the only support/stabilising cushoned shoe our store has from Asics is the Kayano 18 for about 230 $
After reading some about all this online, but still not being able to spend too much, I’m thinking the Asics GT 2160 or 2170 sounded pretty good for us.
I guess my question is, I know you can only say so much with this information and not having our foot to look at but, for overweight moderate overpronators and beginners do you think Asics GT 2160 or 2170 is a good choice.
Also, I heel strike (will try and do less of that tho) and will be training for a 10k run, she’s not so much a heel striker and will mostly be walking but maybe some running. Therefor I was thinking the 2160 for her and the 2170 for me.
I guess I just want to know if my thinking makes some sense here or if I’m totally making the wrong move with this
Thanks!
Edda, congratulations on beginning a new fitness routine and I’m really happy that you like the site. I think that you should try either the 2160/2170, the Mizuno Inspire 8 or the Mizuno Nirvana 8. These shoes are ideal for flexible arches. The Mizuno shoes will be a little lighter and firmer than the Asics which tend to feel softer and bigger underfoot but my best advice is to go with the shoe that fits YOU the best. I wouldn’t worry too much about heel striking, get the best shoe for you, hit the road and make a positive difference in your life. Cheers!
Thanks so much, I’m all excited about this.
The Asics shoes I’ve tried on I really liked and I’m quite confident in my choice to get the GT 2160/2170.
I think when I get into the routine of running in the shoes I will probably get a better feeling for what I like or don’t like and then I can keep the Mizuno shoes, you recomended, in mind.
Since I don’t know much about this I kind of just wanted someone who does to confirm I was making a smart choice so,
thanks again
I have a pair of Asics GT2170′s and have noticed after only about 150 miles that the inner lining on the outside of the rear heel area is worn to such a degree that it is a hole about 1 inch across leaving no padding/lining whatsoever. I was wondering if anyone else has noticed this with this model??
I am most shocked as I have always ran in the Asics GT series and having checked my last pair (GT2160′s) which have done nearly 450 miles there is no sign of any wear of this nature at all, any ideas anybody??
Neil, I would contact Asics and see if you can get a replacement pair of 2170′s or 3030′s.
I’ve been running with my Mizuno Wave Nirvana 6 and later on with the Nike lunarglide 3… I am looking forward to retire my nirvana coz it has seen better days and i am eyeing this gt 2170, new balance 1260 and saucony hurricane 14.. any thoughts or feedback?
Bjorn,
I have had good experiences with the 2170 and 1260. Neither will be as stable as the Nirvana 6 which was a very strong stability shoe(I still have a pair). The 2170 is denser underfoot and feels a little slower in transition and the 1260 is very cushy in the heel and runs quite smoothly and quietly. I would also take a good look at the Nirvana 8 as it is still very supportive and much lighter than the Nirvana 6. Good luck and thanks for reading.
This website is great in helping my narrow my decision. I have flat feet and recently developed plantar fasciitis. I was wearing the Asics Kayano 17 and I am thinking of switching to the GT 2170 but was wondering if you know if these would be a good choice with the plantar fasciitis?
Christine, I believe the 2170 is a better choice than the Kayano if you have plantar fasciitis. The 2170 is considerably more stable and torsionally strong than the Kayano. Also look at the Mizuno Nirvana which is a plantar fasciitis killer! Best wishes.
Christine, I suffered from PF having worn NBs 769s and it took 18 months to get back running.Be careful!! I now use Mizuno Inspire 8s which have given me a new lease of life. Only downside is that after 13 or so miles the shoe seems to lose its cushioning.
I have been a loyal Asics GT 2110 for years but they no longer make them and I am down to 1 new pair in my stockpile. I contacted Asics and their customer service technician stated that the GT 2170 is the replacement for the GT 2110. After doing some research I am hesitate to try the 2170. Does anyone have any suggested subsitute shoes for my beloved 2110′s? I would like to stay in the Asics shoe family but am not opposed to another brand. Thanks.
Excellent shoe!! I have 670 km ( 400 miles ) on my gt-2170 shoes and have zero complaints. Most comfortable shoes I have used. My last run was 15 miles which completed s weekly total of 38 miles. These are truly “foot chocholat”!
Well done Asics!
Hi everyone,
I need help. I just started running. I train 3 times a week (at the gym) and right now I can’t do more than 3 km (I am total beginner).
But because I have problems with my knees(they go inside when I walk or run) I decided to get the advice what shoes would be right for me. I went to a shop where they analyse the way you run and I’ve been told that I am neutral / mild over-pronator runner. I was offer asics 2170 model. I decided to read some review before I make any decision, and reading this review I am not sure if that would be right choice for me.
They are more for long-distance runner (probably it will take me a year to be able to run more than 5-10 km )and they are quit heavy.
Could please someone help me to find right shoes for me (not long distance runner).
Thank you.
Anna, I answered your question in the Wave Alchemy 11 comments section. Thanks!
Hello! I started running about a year ago and as a beginner runner I was suggested to buy the Asics cumulus 12. They worked great until I started training for my first half marathon. After my first 10 mile long run my nail/tip of the second toe started hurting. The pain went away and I was fine with less than 5 mile runs. However after the half marathon the pain come back even with short runs. I went to get fitted for new shoes and I explained them my problem. I was told to buy the Asics GT-2170 in the same size as my previous running shoe (actually they originally told me to buy a smaller size but I would not do it). I went for a couple of runs and the pain still takes place after running shorter distances. Should I take it back and get a larger size? I read that I should be buying shoes in a larger size? Thank you so much!! This website is amazing!!!!!
Jois, you should size up 1/2 to 1 full size larger than what your foot measures when standing on a Brannock device. It sounds as if your toes are hitting the end of the shoe and thus causing the black toesnails. Good luck and we’re happy that you like the site.
I am very confused about your reviews on the GT2170, i am nowhere near a professional runner, jogger, athlete, etc. i am literally your average Joe. Father who lives in workboots by day & sneakers evenings & weekends. I have worn my GT2170s maybe 15 times. My feet (arches) kill everytime now. My workboots have better support. If they hadn’t have discontinued the Reebok Premiers in size 14 ($79.95 Cdn.) I wouldn’t have bought the Asics GT2170 ($180/On Sale for $150 Cdn)
Bigfoot, sorry my review confused you but I’m not sure what it is you’re confused about?
However, it sounds as if you need a more supportive shoe and the Asics 2170, as stated in the review, is only moderately supportive. More supportive shoes would include the Mizuno Alchemy or Nirvana, the Asics Foundation, Saucony Omni and Brooks Beast. Were you fitted for this shoe at a running specialty store? Please elaborate and we will help you as best we can. Thanks for reading.
Hello
I have platar faciatiis and I was womdering which running shoes are the best. I was thinking to get Asiscs GT 2170, they say are good for people with wide feet. I went to the store and I tried asics GT 2170 and they felt so good but I did not have the chance to wear them so i was wondering if anybody can advice.
Thank you!
Hi, just found this site. I’ve been wearing Asics for the past few years, (2150 and 2160). I needed another pair of shoes, tried on the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 12, I really liked them and picked them up. Can you please tell me the comparison between the 2?
thanks,
John, I’m sorry but I have not tested the Adrenaline 12. I did test the 11 but it did not work well for me. I much preferred the Asics 2170 over the Adrenaline 11. Sorry I can’t be more helpful but if the Adrenaline 12 fits you well, then I see no reason not to proceed with it. Good luck and thanks for reading.
Hi. I am trying to find a good walking or running shoe (I do more walking then running). I use to wear the Asics Nimbus and from wearing them I developed plantar fascitis, I was told there wasn’t enough support in them for walking. My Dr. Suggested I try New Balance. I have tried almost evervstyle with no luck. I have high arches as well as the plantar fascitis and I have no idea what tobtry next. I have also tried the Brooks glycerin and they hurt my forefoot, felt like they had no support and my toes even ached in them. I have always loved the way Asics fit but now with the high arch and pf I am not sure what to try. I seem to be a more nuetral pronater but am told by my Dr. For this pf I need stability in the heel and arch supporting in the shoe. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Linda, I have some friends with neutral feet and plantar issues. I have seen the Mizuno Wave Creation work wonders for this foot type with this specific problem. I recommend you start there.
Hi. I wanted to let you know I went out and bought the Mizuno Wave Creation as you suggested. I can’t thank you enough. They have helped tremendously. I have been wearing then every single day and my feet feel like they are about 80 – 90 percent better! Thank you so much for the help!
Hey Theo,
After starting to get into running I was running in whatever running shoe I could afford never taking into account I have a bad over pronation issue. At the advice of a friend that was a long time runner I visited a local running shoe to get my gait test and confirmed the pronation issues. In this, I was suggested to get the 2170 being my first fitted running shoe and I am now 200 miles in and about to run in my first half marathon this upcoming weekend. I am in love with the 2170. I am eager to put a few more miles on them to officially be able to retire my first pair and get into my second pair. Great review and great site.
Regards,
Shawn in Denver
I’m at the 2nd pair of GT2170 since march.
I found those shoes very comfortable and resistant.
I’m an amateur runner 30-35 km per week with average pace 5min 20sec per km and my weight is 83kg.
Hi, bought two pairs of the GT-2170. One at a local Greek Store in Athens, and one at a US Retailer and had my Mom mail them. I notice that the Greek one seems to be heavier and bulkier than the sleeker GT-2170 from the US. Were there two versions of the GT-2170 or did they redo the GT-2170 over a few years? But, I’ve ran in Asics for 10 years, and before than 10 years in Air Max Nike… So, I’m riding out the cheaper prices and same quality of Asics…
I have purchased 2 pairs of Asics sneakers and I do find they are comfortable but what ever glue they are using to attach the gel heel to the sole is horrible and fall apart fairly quickly.. I rotated between both shoes fairly often, I find that I get the best wear that way but after less then 6 months and not much mileage on them they are no good to me at this point I am to afraid the heel portion will fall off and cause a injury with that said I don’t recommend these sneakers stay away from them unless you like to buy new shoes every month.
I started running on the Asics 2070′s and chakged to Kayano’s about 4 years ago (the 13′s I think?). I then saw the Nike Lunarglide’s and liked the way they looked. Why did I get sucked in on how a trainer looks after getting a professional fit from a running shop….
Anyway after 6 months of progressively worse pain inmy left knee I purchased a pair of 2170′s and the pian in my knee is no more. I’m now enjoying runing again.
That’s not to say the Nikes are a bad show, they are just not right for me. My advice for anyone who wants to try a new shoe is to go to a specialist running shop, who will analyise the way you run and let you try different makes of trainer on the treadmill.
Hi Theo,
I’ve been running in the Brooks Adrenaline 12. Then after a 12mile with lots of hills, I was getting medial shin splints. And I was out for about a month. I though maybe I needed new shoes. At the store, I tried on the the Asics gt2170, and it’s one of the most comfortable shoes I’ve ever walked in. It was much softer than my Brooks Usually I don’t like walking in running shoes because they hurt my feet. So I’m thinking that maybe I’ve finally found the right shoe. I finally took it out for a couple runs, and I was getting the same nagging pain in the inside of my shin again. I went back to my brooks, and the pain was definitely not as intense. Is the softness not giving me enough support? Can that cause medial shin splints when I’m not getting enough support?
Blistered my heel at about the 5 mile mark. I’ve worn 40 dollar adidas urahas that feel better. I’ve run in 15 dollar Costco shoes (in emergencies at work when I forgot my running shoes) that don’t have a good sole but didn’t blister. GT 2170 fit well, no way should I have got the blister. Disappointed. Used to run in ASICS Tigers in the late 70s and early 80s, but since then the quality has gone way down, probably for pursuit of profit. Back then it was a smaller company and easier quality control. Will not try ASICS again. I wish adidas still made the uraha. I run up to 70 miles a week and found that whether the shoe costs 40 dollars or 180 dollars, it doesn’t matter. The features don’t matter. It’s all about how they feel to you individually.
Hi Theo! I’m a new runner, recently started training on treadmill. My goal is to be able to run marathons, 5k. I am 5’0, 110 lbs. I am looking for a new shoe. Found this one on sale (ONLINE) and really liked the look, very cool. I haven’t tried them on. I read some of these reviews and they seem to cause a lot of pain. Should I stay away? What do you recommend?
Using ASICS GT 2170 for the past one week. Yes, it is comfortable, but feel it is slightly heavy and I am not able to move faster when comparing to my old shoe (a Reebok low cost shoe, in India).
Wondering whether I have wasted my money.
No big advantage from this 2170.
Thanks,
Mohandas
Chennai, India
Hi Theo,
First let me thanked you for your hard work and good advice when writing up all these reviews. I’m brand new to running and found all these info most helpful.
2 months ago I bought a pair of GT 2170 size 12 or 46.5 (I’m size 11)they feel great but I recently experience a pain in my left hip when running.
I’m 40 and overpronator, I weight now 79 kg, only started to run recently 28.01.13 and lost 3 kg in two months.
I really enjoy running and do on average 15/20 miles/week
I manage a bar and work anti social hours but I don’t let that stop me, I’m out running 5 times a week, it’s like a new religion to me, where body, soul and spirit separate and reform, I just feel great each time, every step and every breath keep me more alive with a great sense of accomplishment.
Sorry I just had to share that bit with you but in fact it’s mush more than I can explain.
I don’t want the pain to get worth and have to stop running, so I started to research which shoes should be best but there is lot of confusion between pros and cons reviews. I’ve been guided toward Brooks adrenaline but I really don’t know if thats the right shoes for me
I thought that the hill cushioning of my 2170 may cause the pain on my left hip…
Your opinion will be highly valued.