Review: Brooks Catamount

Written by

Henry Howard

Ultra runner and certified running coach.

This expert review is written by

Henry Howard

Ultra runner and certified running coach.
Henry Howard has come a long way since a teacher called him "molasses" during a fifth-grade track and field event.

Now living and running in Indiana, he has completed more than a dozen marathons and is a regular age-grouper in shorter distances.


We usually consider 10 ounces a "medium" weight for a running shoe: less than 10 and we are entering the lightweight category and above 10 the shoes start to be heavy.

Heel-to-toe drop

Heel drop is the measurement in mm of the difference between the height of the heel and the toe of the sole.

A lower drop (0mm - 5mm) promotes running on mid-foot and fore-foot, while higher drops (8mm - 12mm) are more traditional and meant to support a heel-striking gait.
Expert score

Quick overview

Best for
Regular training, long, slow training runs, speedwork on flat surfaces
Best for moderate trails, technical trails, muddy areas, through creeks and streams
The Catamount provides good traction on most types of terrains and surfaces
Lack Traction
Average Traction
Provide Traction
The Catamount offers just the right amount of cushioning
Little cushioning
Medium cushioning
Highly cushioned


255 g
Heel to toe drop



Pros and cons according to our running expert

Pros and cons according to our running expert

  • Rocket-fuel fast
  • Light yet firm midsole
  • Very comfortable
  • Breathable upper
  • Not well-suited for technical terrain
  • Foothold can be sketchy
  • Colors not ideal for mud and dirt

Our verdict

The Brooks Catamount is built for speed and rivals some of the other top trail shoes with a similar focus.

While the Catamount is ideal for pushing the pace and handling road-to-trail transitions, it is clearly not meant for more than moderate or challenging terrain or climbs.

Introduction Brooks Catamount

Brooks Catamount - Medial Side

Brooks Catamount – Medial Side

The Brooks Catamount caught my eye immediately when pulling it out of the box. Its white and light blue design does not evoke imagery most often associated with shoes made for trail running.

Cushioning Type
The Catamount is more responsive than plush:... Read more provides energy return and some shock
Cushioning Amount
The Catamount offers just the right amount of... Read more cushioning
Little cushioning
Highly cushioned
The Catamount is extremely flexible at the... Read more expense of some structure
The Catamount has some inherent stability and... Read more support
Not particularly stable
Very stable

Impressions Brooks Catamount

Brooks Catamount - Pair

Brooks Catamount – Pair

However, Brooks has created a light and nimble trail shoe built for speed on easy and moderate trails. A men’s size 9 is 9.5 ounces while a women’s size 8 is 8.5 ounces.

The Catamount provides an airy, yet secure feeling and an upper with a good amount of cushioning.

Brooks uses its DNA Flash technology for this shoe which it has also used in the Tempo and Hyperion Elite 2.

Nitrogen is infused into the midsole compound to give it more zing yet less weight.

With a 6 mm drop, the Catamount’s engineered midsole, lightness and responsiveness combine to let the runner test his or her limits on smooth trails, bike paths and road-to-trails.

For a shoe designed with speed in mind, the Catamount does offer an appropriate amount of protection.

Protection Brooks Catamount

Brooks Catamount - Top

Brooks Catamount – Top

Overall, there is plenty of protection for easy and moderate trails. Runners will feel a sense of confidence with the 3.5mm lug outsole and a hardened EVA rock plate.

One thing that surprised me about the Catamount was the ample toe box.

Like other new shoes, it provides the toes some room to breathe and expand without feeling spacious like an Altra or others with an intentionally wide toe box.

The Catamounts have a thin tongue and minimal laces. At first glance, that combination would seem unsuitable for a trail shoe upper.

However, the dense yet mesh similar to the Salomon Sense Pro 4, and series of thin overlays work well to provide adequate protection.

The rock plate in the Catamount provides... Read more adequate protection from sharp rocks on the
Not present
Solid protection
The Catamount provides good traction on most... Read more types of terrains and surfaces
Lack Traction
Provide Traction
Water resistance
The Catamount provides a decent protection... Read more from splashes and puddles
Water Resistant

Durability Brooks Catamount

Brooks Catamount - Sole

Brooks Catamount – Sole

At the 50-mile mark, durability seems to be average. The majority of my miles have been on cross-country courses featuring grassy sections, single-track trail and some grassy sections.

Additionally I run about 1.5 miles roundtrip to and from the XC course on roads/sidewalks.

As it does with other shoes, Brooks uses TrailTack sticky rubber with a Ballistic Rock Shield of hardened ESS EVA and 3.5mm lug pattern.

While the lugs are on the smaller side — again, these are built for speed on flat trails not plodding through mud – they do provide a decent grip on basic trail obstacles.

Loose rocks, a root or wet surfaces primarily.

However, the few times when I have taken the Catamounts to more challenging terrain, they have shown their weakness. They simply do not capably handle even moderately steep terrain and loose footing.

Responsiveness & Speed Brooks Catamount

Brooks Catamount - Heel

Brooks Catamount – Heel

So you want to go fast? This is where the Catamounts rise to the challenge. For cross-country course running, they are among the best in class.

The responsiveness around corners or bends in the trail allows the runner to keep propelling forward without losing speed.

Among the workouts I have done in these shoes is short intervals of 10K pace.

The sneakers held up well and allowed me to hit that extra gear on various trail terrain — single track, dirt/gravel mix and grassy sections.

Going uphill presents a different challenge. If the climb is short and non-technical, these shoes will nail it. If it is longer and more technical, they are not the best option.

Comfort and Fit Brooks Catamount

Brooks Catamount - Medial Side

Brooks Catamount – Medial Side

When it comes to comfort, we’ll circle back to the mesh upper one last time. It is among the things I especially like about this shoe. Not only is it comfortable, it holds form well.

The fit is secure in the heel and midfoot. The booty-style tongue is thin and the laces are on the shorter end but I never experienced an issue with the lacing or securing the foot.

The heel collar is moderately padded and the counter combines flexibility and firmness.

The Catamount has average sizing: buy the... Read more usual size
Buy size smaller
Buy size bigger

Conclusion Brooks Catamount

Brooks Catamount - Closeup

Brooks Catamount – Closeup

The Brooks Catamount is an outstanding and fast ride for shorter trail runs and races. It provides a good balance of several key factors — spring, response, cushion and comfort.

If you are looking for a fast shoe for easy to moderate terrain, the Catamount is definitely one to consider.

It complements other Brooks models like the Cascadia and Caldera, which are designed to handle more technical trails.

If you are a Brooks fan, this would round out your collection nicely, giving you a great option for midweek speed work on trails, or a performance shoe for a fast run, race or FKT attempt up to roughly a half marathon distance.

The Catamount is in the same class as several other recent launches, including the Hoka One One Torrent 2 and the Nike Kiger 6.

The Torrent 2 is just a little lighter while the Catamount has more stack height. While the Torrent 2 does not have the cushioning that Hoka generally offers, it feels better cushioned than the Catamount.

The Torrent 2 also has larger, more aggressive lugs. I would pick the Torrents over the Catamounts.

The Kiger 6 is incredibly fast even though it is a little heavier than the Catamounts. The Kiger 6 performs better when encountering loose traction on the trails and it also has a better foothold.

That said I have experienced foot pain when running in the Kigers past the 10K mark.

To me, the shoes are very comparable and I would likely choose the Kigers for a 10K or under fast race on easy trails and the Catamounts for a half marathon distance on similar terrain.

This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Write a review

About the Brooks Catamount
You help others with their choice by sharing your experience. Additionally, you have a montlhy chance to win $50
Required, never published on the site
Help others and have chance to win $50 Privacy policy

Your review was successfully posted.

Every month we pick one published review at random.
If your review wins, you will get a notification by email.

Winner will receive Amazon gift card of $50 or equivalent in other currency.

Reviews Read what other runners say

Write a review
Help others and have a chance to win $50

Ask a question

About the Brooks Catamount
Once your question is answered, it will be posted on the site and you will get a notification by email.
Required, never published on the site

Your question was successfully sent.

Once your question is answered, it will be posted on the site and you will get a notification by email.

Questions & Answers

Ask a question

Similar shoes to Brooks Catamount