If you are looking on the lower price end of shoes and want a lightweight daily trainer, this shoe will give you that. Someone looking for a shoe that combines responsiveness with cushion would like this shoe. Finally, a runner who likes to train fast will enjoy this shoe.
If you’re looking for a plush daily trainer, a shoe that will propel you in your run, or a shoe that has a pillow-soft midsole, then steer clear! I also think the toe box is a big on the snug side so anyone with wide feet might want to look elsewhere.
The Adidas Adizero SL2 is Adidas’s attempt at providing a daily trainer that is light enough for some faster miles while also cushioned enough to use often.
This is their entry level shoe on their Adizero line which includes the Adizero Boston 12, Takumi Sen, Adios 8, and Adios Pro 3.
The main difference as you go up the line is going to be the type of midsole cushioning and how much. For comparison, this shoe lines up against the Brooks Ghost 16, Asics Gel-Cumulus 26, and the New Balance 880.
This shoe is not as soft as the Gel-Cumulus but not nearly as firm as the Brooks Ghost. It is the lightest of the shoes and it’s very noticeable when you first put it on. In terms of responsiveness, it is similar to the feel of the Gel-Cumulus.
This is an update to the first version of this shoe. There were several updates to this shoe that would be improvements. First, they added in LightStrike Pro foam inside of the LightStrike 2.0, making for a softer midsole cushion. This change in midsole also helps with comfort on longer runs. Second, they redid the upper to a lightweight engineered mesh, which makes the shoe more breathable.
Finally, there was an additional height to the midsole, with the heel going from 35mm to 26mm and the forefoot going from 26.5mm to 27mm. The heel-to-toe drop went from 8.5mm to 9mm. With the combination of these changes, the shoe got about 0.1 oz lighter even with slightly more midsole.
One other feature of this shoe is that it is made of 20% recycled materials.
My first impression of the shoe upon opening the box was that the shoe had a pretty cool design. When I first picked up the shoe, I was surprised by just how lightweight it was.
My first run in this shoe was 5 mile easy run but I was in elevation for the first time. The run overall felt great and the shoes disappeared on my feet. I didn’t think the shoe helped a ton with pacing but it also never inhibited anything either.
The cushion was fine but certainly not pillowy-soft. There doesn’t feel like there is a rocker in this shoe so I never felt propelled forward but I did feel some level of energy return as I was bouncing from stride to stride. This shoe did the job overall. It felt a little tight, enough that I stopped mid run to retie my laces and loosen up a bit.
My next run was a tempo run and I didn’t necessarily feel like the shoe was helping me hit my tempo paces. I did struggle to make my pace and I never really felt like the shoe could encourage me further.
The shoe is comfortable and breathable, handling the North Carolina summer humidity just fine.
The one complaint I have is with the engineered upper. I wore thin socks for one of these runs and I could feel the outside of the shoe rubbing through the sock. It never caused a blister or any hot spots. It simply felt uncomfortable.
The upper of the shoe was an improvement from the previous version as it is more breathable and slightly lighter in weight.
I don’t love the material as it feels a bit rough on the feet. I would not wear super thin socks as there could be some irritation there.
Definitely do not wear this without socks as it will cut up your feet. The tongue is not gusseted (attached) and is a bit on the thick side. It’s comfortable but it doesn’t quite match with the airy mesh of the rest of the upper. The laces stay tied even on a single knot.
The fit of the upper is what might be bothersome for some runners. It’s a bit on the narrow side. I could feel the shoe hug the width of my forefoot, which is not something I typically feel. I would beware if you have wider feet.
In terms of the sole unit, the midsole foam that Adidas uses is a combination of their Lightstrike 2.0 and Lightstrike Pro.
The main difference between the two is the energy return. Lightstrike Pro is their premium foam found exclusively in their highest end shoes. What you get in the cheaper parts of the line is the combination with their Lightstrike 2.0 foam, which is not nearly as soft or bouncy.
In this shoe, there is a layer of Lightstrike Pro that is sandwiched in between two layers of Lightstrike 2.0, with the hopes that it will help give some energy return and propulsion. It does ok. It certainly helps make the ride comfortable but I never felt like it was pushing me along.
The midsole was softer than the Brooks Ghost but not as plush as the Gel-Cumulus 26. The midsole drop is 9mm, which is 0.5mm higher than the previous version. It fits in with many shoes in this range. The drop was not noticeable to me and felt comfortable.
The outsole of the shoe also does not use its premium materials, notably missing the Continental Rubber found on many shoes as you go up the line. I found the rubber outsole to be fine enough for a daily trainer but if you’re looking for a shoe with excellent grip then you will need to move up the Adidas line. For what you’re paying for, though, this outsole works. After 55 miles, the rubber barely looked like it had been run in so I anticipate good longevity in this shoe.
The ride on the shoe overall is fine. Again, I never felt like there was any rocker that was helping me propel forward and I didn’t get a huge energy return.
That said, there was some energy return and enough that it was helpful for some longer efforts at easy to medium paces. I felt like I was able to use my normal gait throughout all the runs.
Overall, the Adidas Adizero SL has been an average to good shoe. It’s lightweight, soft-ish, and comfortable on most runs.
At its price point ($130), it’s worth what you’re paying for. You’re not going to get more than you paid for but that’s not always how it’s supposed to work.
I do recommend this shoe for those that like to be light on their feet and like to vary their paces on their runs. I will personally keep this shoe in my rotation for those faster easy runs and the shorter long runs.
3 days ago
Training for a 10k PR and debating between these and the Takumi Sen 9 for my workout days. I destroy outsoles pretty quick (midfoot striker here) – anyone put some serious miles on these? The price difference is pretty big, trying to figure out if the Takumi is worth the extra cash for twice-weekly speed sessions.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 weeks ago
Put 175 miles on these bad boys and they really do it all. Been using them for easy runs and tempo work – they’re like a Swiss Army knife for training. Love how they respond when I pick up the pace but still feel good on recovery days. The Continental rubber looks barely scuffed. Not as cushy as my old Ultraboosts, but that’s actually better for faster stuff. If you’re looking for one shoe to handle everything, these are it. They feel more forgiving than my Boston 11s but still let you feel the road. Even when I’m dead tired at the end of my long runs, they keep me steady.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Need a new tempo day shoe and eyeing these. I burn through outsoles pretty quick (forefoot striker here) – anyone put serious miles on these yet? Been loving my Takumi Sen 9s but they’re getting pricey. Would these be a decent alternative or should I just grab the Boston 12s instead?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Getting ready for spring race season and need something for those Thursday tempo runs. Anyone compare these to the Boston 12? My current adidas usually last forever (got 450 miles out of my Boston 11s!) – hoping these hold up just as well. Also doing longer interval sessions – would these work for that?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Put the adizero SL 2 through its paces with 175 miles of mixed training. The responsive ride really shines during tempo runs – I’ve hit several 10K PRs in these. While not as plush as some daily trainers, the firmer cushioning provides excellent ground feel and energy return. Durability is impressive – the Continental rubber outsole shows minimal wear even after track workouts. Used these for a recent half marathon and they performed beautifully. They remind me of the Boston 9, but with better stability. Only drawback is they’re a bit firm for recovery days.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 weeks ago
I’ve put about 200 miles on my adizero SL 2s and they’ve really impressed me. The lightweight design makes them perfect for my tempo runs, while still having enough cushioning for daily training. I recently ran a half marathon in them and appreciated how they maintained responsiveness throughout. Compared to my previous Adios Pro 3, these feel more versatile for everyday use. The outsole grip has been excellent on both wet and dry surfaces, though I agree the cushioning could be a bit more plush. They remind me of the Saucony Ride but with a more performance-oriented feel. My only real complaint is that the upper could be more breathable during hot weather runs.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
Found these on sale at my local running store – $95 seemed like a steal! Been using them for my morning 5Ks and they’re holding up great. Not as plush as my trusty Ghost 15s but perfect for those shorter, faster days. Just wish they came in better colors than this weird blue/orange combo!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Hey everyone! About to pull the trigger on these for my first marathon training block. My Bostons are usually perfect in size 8, but heard these might run different? Also – any high-mileage runners out there? Need something that’ll last through 16 weeks of training without falling apart!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Getting back into running after a break and debating between these and the Boston 12. The price difference is pretty big – are the Bostons really worth the extra $40 for someone doing 20-25 miles per week? Looking for something that’ll last through summer training.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
I’ve logged about 200 miles in the adizero SL 2 and they’ve become my go-to daily trainers. The lightweight construction really shines during tempo runs – I used them for a recent half marathon PR. While they’re not as plush as my previous Ultraboosts, the responsive cushioning is perfect for pushing the pace. The Continental rubber outsole shows minimal wear after all these miles. One thing I particularly appreciate is the stability – no wobble during cornering. At $129.95, they offer excellent value compared to other speed-oriented trainers. I’ve found them especially good for distances between 5K and half marathon.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
I’ve put about 200 miles on my adizero SL 2s and can confidently say they hit the sweet spot for daily training. The responsive cushioning is perfect for my medium-paced runs (8:30-9:00/mile), though I do wish there was a bit more plushness for recovery days. Compared to my previous daily trainer (Nike Pegasus 39), these feel more nimble and less bulky. The outsole grip has been excellent even on wet roads and shows minimal wear. My only real complaint is the somewhat firm ride – it took about 50 miles to break in properly. I’ve used these for everything from 5k tempo runs to 15-mile long runs. While not as springy as the Adios Pro 3, they’re more versatile for everyday use. For $130, they deliver solid performance.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Eyeing these for my Tuesday tempo sessions – any Endorphin Speed 3 users try these out? Really curious about the pop comparison. Also dealing with the usual Adidas sizing headache – wear 10 in Nike but usually size down to 9.5 in Adidas. Same deal with these?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
The Adizero SL 2 has been my daily trainer for the past 3 months. I’ve logged about 200 miles in them, mostly for tempo runs and track workouts. The Lightstrike Pro midsole isn’t as soft as competitors, but that’s what makes it great for faster paces – I’ve hit several 5K PRs in these. They feel more stable than the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, though not quite as propulsive. The durability is impressive – barely any wear on the Continental rubber outsole. Perfect for runners who want a firmer, faster daily trainer.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.5 months ago
After putting 150 miles on the Adizero SL 2, I can confidently say these are excellent daily trainers. The responsive cushioning hits a sweet spot – enough protection for long runs but still maintains ground feel. Did my last half marathon in 1:45 wearing these. Compared to the previous SL, the upper fits more securely and the outsole grip is noticeably better, especially in wet conditions. Not quite as plush as the Ultraboost but more versatile for varied paces. Recently used them for track intervals and they performed admirably. A great value at this price point compared to premium offerings.
6 months ago
Made the switch from the Boston 11s last month. These definitely ride firmer which works for me, but I do miss that springy Lightstrike Pro feeling. Still, for the price point, they’re solid for daily training. My feet feel fresh even after hour-long runs.
10 months ago
The energy return is solid, but I found the upper to be way too stiff for my liking over longer runs. It rubs a bit at the ankle, which isn’t ideal. The cushioning, though, is top-notch and helped me push through some tough miles. Overall, it’s a good but not perfect shoe for my neutral stride.