If you find the Novablast not cushioned enough or too heavy, the Superblast 2 is a good option.
If you’re looking for a shoe that feels like a super shoe but doesn’t have a stiff plate in it, the Superblast 2 is the perfect shoe.
If you like flexible trainers with lots of ground feel, the Superblast 2 is not the shoe for you.
If you have really wide feet, the Superblast 2 will be too narrow for you.
I think even ASICS underestimated how successful the Superblast was going to be.
For the past 2 years, the Superblast has been one of the difficult running shoes to purchase. Colourway after colourway, it has sold out and if you were waiting for it to go on discount, you would have been met with disappointment because it is excluded from promotions.
There are a few main reasons why the Superblast is such a successful series.
When it was launched 2 years ago, the Superblast quickly became one of my favourite ASICS trainers. I loved how much cushioning it had and how lightweight it felt. It also felt comfortable doing easy paces because it didn’t have a stiff carbon plate. It was a truly unique offering.
Running shoe prices rarely decrease: the Superblast launched at a price of $220 but after a few months, the price came down to $200 due to a lack of sales. $200 was the sweet spot and the Superblast has sold like hot cakes ever since.
This year, the Superblast 2 sold out online and in stores on the day it launched here in Malaysia. ASICS restricted stock for the first version but not for the second. Even with the increase in supply of v2, it still sold out and none of the retailers have restocked yet.
The Superblast 2 maintains its $200 price tag which is good news. The bad news is that it now weighs 8.8 oz (250 g), which is 0.4 oz (11 g) heavier than version 1.
It has the same stack height as v1 and although it looks very similar to its predecessor, it has a new outsole, midsole and upper.
My first run in the Superblast 2 was a 20 kilometre recovery run. Just like the first version, it was smooth, stable and very well-cushioned.
The most noticeable improvement was the new upper which felt much more comfortable. The true-to-size length and width were perfect.
The ride was very similar to version 1 and I was disappointed that it didn’t deliver more energy return considering it has FF Turbo+, the new premium super foam.
The most similar ride to the Superblast 2 is the Novablast 4. I said in my review of the original Superblast that it could have been named the “Novablast Pro” or the “Novablast Elite”.
The Superblast 2 felt similar to the Novablast 4 but slightly lighter and with more cushioning.
The upper of the Superblast 2 is an improvement over the first version. It fits better and it feels better ventilated. The mesh on the top of the toe-box lets in more air, as do the side panels, so breathability is much better.
The flat tongue is semi-gusseted and it does not slide around. Foot lockdown is superb and there’s an internal heel counter for support in the rear of the shoe. It has reflective Superblast wording on the heel pull tab for safety in low light conditions.
It fits true to size but it has a narrow, snug forefoot and toe-box. It’s best suited to narrow, low-volume feet. Unfortunately it doesn’t come in a wide version, unlike ASICS’ older trainers such as the Nimbus and Cumulus.
The Superblast 2 is a rare running shoe because it feels like a super shoe but it doesn’t have a plate in it. It’s lightweight, snappy, very cushioned and has a responsive ride.
What sets the Superblast apart from the crowd is its high stack height and the absence of a plate in its midsole.
Most of the other trainers/racers with midsoles above 40 mm in stack height have a plate or other stiffener in their midsole to create structure in order to enhance the stability of the tall midsole.
The Superblast’s midsole is not squishy or extremely soft, so it doesn’t need a plate. It also has a broad base, so it’s already a very stable shoe and it provides plenty of support.
Long runs are the Superblast 2’s speciality. It has enough cushioning for a full marathon and its lightweight build (for a trainer) allows your legs to remain fresher for longer. Its gentle forefoot rocker eases you through transitions and helps you save energy.
The Superblast 2 is an incredibly versatile trainer. Slow paces above 6 minutes per kilometre feel great, as do uptempo paces below 4:30 per kilometre (7:15 per mile). Marathon pace feels comfortable but I find that when I push it to my threshold pace (4 minutes per km/6:26 per mile) or faster, it struggles a bit to hold it there.
The new FF Turbo+ foam combined with the new FF Blast+ Eco foam in its midsole feel very similar in softness to the last version. Even wearing one version on each foot at the same time, it’s hard to tell the difference. It’s a medium-firm ride which feels balanced and just right.
The outsole is the biggest improvement. It now has ridges on the rubber lugs so there’s more bite upon contact with the ground. Grip is also decent on wet surfaces now. There are no more holes in the outsole so stones don’t get trapped anymore.
Outsole durability is above average. I haven’t noticed much wear on my pair after 80 kilometres even with my heavy heel-striking form.
The Superblast 2 is one of the most versatile trainers to be released this year. It has plenty of cushioning for distances above 30 kilometres, it has a stable ride and its forefoot rocker makes it energy-saving. It also has a surprisingly low weight for such a tall midsole which gives it the ability to effortlessly pick up the pace.
If I was asked to recommend a racer with no carbon plate (for a non-elite runner), I would recommend the Superblast 2 because it has a racing foam and it feels like a super shoe. Its $200 price tag is not excessive considering the Metaspeed series is $250 and you’re getting more FF Turbo+ foam in the Superblast 2.
The one thing I would change is to add a deep decoupled groove underneath the shoe, similar to the Novablast 1. This would increase the trampoline effect (more bounce and energy return) and would decrease the weight.
The Novablast is the Superblast’s biggest competitor and it is encroaching in the Superblast 2’s space.
The Novablast 4 has seen a midsole stack height increase of 2 mm and is now also above 40 mm in stack height. It doesn’t feel as fast as the Superblast 2 (due to its training midsole foam) but it’s $60 cheaper and is much better value for money. It’s also much easier to buy than the Superblast 2.
4 days ago
After 200 miles in the Superblast 2, I can confidently say these are the best long run shoes I’ve ever owned. The stable platform lets me maintain form even when fatigue sets in during 20-milers. Used them for marathon training and they excelled on everything from recovery runs to marathon pace work. The improved upper breathability is noticeable compared to v1 which I also owned. Only downside is the weight gain – I notice it most during pickups. Did my fall marathon in them (3:42) and had zero foot issues. They’ve held up extremely well though I rotate them with Nimbus 25s. A bit pricey but worth it for the versatility.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 week ago
Been running in these for a couple weeks after loving the OG Superblast. Definitely feeling that extra weight they added – not a deal-breaker but noticeable on longer runs. At least they fixed that sketchy grip issue! Really wish ASICS would make these in wide though, my feet are crying after 10+ miles.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 week ago
The Superblast 2 has become my go-to trainer after 300+ miles of testing. I’ve used it for everything from recovery runs to 20-milers preparing for Boston. The max cushioning provides excellent protection without feeling mushy – I can still pick up the pace when needed. The improved upper breathability is noticeable in warm weather compared to v1. While it has gained some weight, the stable ride and versatility make it worth the premium price for me. Completed my latest marathon in 3:15 wearing these and had zero foot fatigue. The only shoes that come close for long runs are the Endorphin Shift 3 or Glycerin 20, but the Superblast feels more responsive.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Been living in these shoes for 3 months and 275 miles now. They do it all – recovery jogs to marathon training. The new upper is so much better – no more heel rubbing like the v1 gave me. Sure, they gained some weight, but the extra grip and stability make up for it. Knocked out two 20-milers and my legs stayed fresh. They respond better at speed than my Nimbus 27s. Yeah, $200 is steep but they’re built to last – barely showing any wear.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
Just tried these on after putting 400+ miles on my original Superblasts. Love the upgraded upper – way more breathable on my sweaty feet! But man, $200 is hard to swallow when the Novablast 4 feels pretty similar for way less. Guess I’ll keep stalking the sales section…
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
After 200 miles in the Superblast 2, I can confidently say this is my go-to trainer for long runs. The improved outsole grip is noticeable – no more picking stones out like in v1! While it gained some weight, the enhanced upper comfort makes up for it. I’ve used it for multiple 20+ mile training runs preparing for Boston, and the max cushioning really shines after 2 hours on feet. Compared to the Novablast 4, it’s more stable but less bouncy. The stack height worried me initially but lateral stability is impressive. For pure speed sessions I prefer the Magic Speed 3, but for everything else, especially marathon training, this is my current favorite.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Training for Chicago Marathon and debating between these and the Nimbus 25. Kind of worried about the weight increase I’ve been reading about – does it become an issue around mile 15-20? Currently rotating between two pairs of Nimbus but looking to try something new for those really long training runs.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Getting ready for Chicago and need some new trainers. My feet run pretty wide – how do these compare to other ASICS? I’m in Nimbus wides right now. Also saw they got a bit heavier – anyone notice this during their long runs? Training in Houston heat if that matters!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Training for Chicago (my first full!) and wondering if these could be my main shoe. Currently in the Novablast 3 but want something with more pop for those 20-milers coming up. Anyone put these through a full training cycle? Also trying to figure out sizing – I’m a 10 in Novablast but heard these fit different?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Currently running in Novablast 3s for my 10K training and eyeing these as an upgrade. Really wondering if the extra $50 is worth it for someone like me doing 25-30 miles per week? Also noticed they’re a bit heavier – anyone find this impacts their tempo runs?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Need a new long run shoe for my weekend 15-milers. Currently in the Novablast 4 but looking to upgrade. I slightly overpronate – anyone with similar form issues tried these? That $200 price tag is making me hesitate – convince me it’s worth it?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
After putting 200+ miles on the Superblast 2, I can confidently say it’s one of the best long run shoes I’ve used. The improved outsole grip is noticeable on wet surfaces compared to v1, which was a major issue before. I’ve used these for marathon training runs up to 22 miles and they provide excellent protection without feeling sluggish. While they are heavier than v1, the trade-off in stability makes it worthwhile. I alternate these with the Novablast 3 for different training needs. The upper improvements are subtle but welcome – much better ventilation on hot days. Ran a 3:15 marathon in these and my legs felt fresh after. Not quite as snappy as the Magic Speed 3, but perfect for long training.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Having logged over 300 miles in the Superblast 2, I can confidently say it’s worth the investment for serious runners. The max cushioning handles high mileage beautifully – I’ve used these for multiple 20+ mile training runs preparing for Boston. The stability is remarkable given the stack height, much better than my previous Novablast 3. The improved outsole grip is noticeable, especially on wet surfaces. While they’re heavier than v1, the trade-off in comfort and durability is worth it. The upper breathability is excellent during long summer runs. Used these for a recent marathon (3:25) and they performed flawlessly from start to finish. Yes, they’re pricey at $200, but the versatility and durability justify the cost.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
I’ve logged over 250 miles in the Superblast 2 and it’s easily the best max cushioned trainer I’ve used. The dual-foam setup strikes an incredible balance – soft enough for recovery days but responsive enough for marathon pace work. I’ve done everything from easy 5 milers to 22-mile long runs in these. Compared to other max cushion options like the New Balance More v4 or Hoka Bondi, the Superblast feels much more versatile. The weight increase from v1 is noticeable but hasn’t impacted performance. Upper breathability is significantly improved – no more heat issues on warm days. The outsole grip is also better in wet conditions. Only real downside is the price, but the durability justifies it. As a heavier runner (180 lbs) training for ultras, these have been perfect.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
I’ve put the Superblast 2 through its paces with over 300 miles of training, including several 20+ mile runs preparing for Boston. The max cushioning really shines on long runs – my legs feel fresher compared to the Novablast 3. The improved outsole grip is noticeable on wet roads. While it’s heavier than v1, the trade-off for better stability is worth it. I’ve found it versatile enough for everything from recovery jogs to marathon pace work. The premium price is justified by the durability and versatility. Compared to the Nike Invincible 3, it feels more structured and stable. An excellent workhorse trainer that excels at long distances.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.5 months ago
Exceptional long run shoe, really looks after your legs and seems to be getting better the more miles I put into them. Not as fast as the Magic Speed 4 for speed workouts, but my go to for anything 10k and over. Worth the hype
6 months ago
Just tried these on after being a Nimbus fan forever – gotta say, I’m not sold. That stack height feels way too tall for my liking, and $200? Come on ASICS, the Novablast does basically the same thing for way less. Sure, the wider base is nice, but I’ll stick with what I know works.
7 months ago
Would you recommend these for someone training for their first marathon, or would you suggest a more cushioned shoe for that kind of mileage?
7 months ago
Yes, this would be a great marathon training shoe. It has plenty of cushioning.
9 months ago
I’ve used the Superblast 2 for about 50 miles now, and other than the slightly rigid feel during the first couple of runs, they started to break in well. Really impressed with the weight-to-cushion ratio.
9 months ago
Solid do it all shoe, but not great for anything. I have a low volume narrow foot and the fit is too roomy for me. This fit feels like a one size fits all, not at all like a Hoka for example where it’s glove-like. The upper might be more breathable than v1 but it’s not all that breathable still and its the only shoe I own that runs warm. I think it’s probably from the very beefy build of the heel collar and rear of the shoe, which feels bulky on the run despite it actually being a very lightweight shoe. It’s incredibly stable, would be great for non-technical trail runs. But for me it feels too clunky and while it’s ok for slow miles it’s not ideal (maybe I’m too light for this shoe at 140 lbs) …and yet it also doesn’t feel at all like a fast shoe – for tempo inspiration – but the bounce and energy return does feel better below 7:00 mile pace. I think the Cielo or Mach X are MILES better for similar use. Just my 2 cents
10 months ago
These look like a solid choice! How would you compare them to the Novablast 3 in terms of durability? I’ve had mixed results with the Novablast and would love to hear about how the Superblast holds up over time for daily runs.
10 months ago
I see that you mentioned the Superblast 2 is good for long-distance runs, but does it perform equally well on shorter, faster sessions? I’m trying to decide between this and the Novablast for more speed-oriented training.