A budget-conscious runner looking for a supportive daily trainer.
Someone in need of a lot of stability from their running shoes.
ASICS stability lineup consists of three trainers, the GT-1000, GT-2000, and the Kayano. These three trainers possess many of the same aspects. The newest technologies are unveiled in the Kayanos and then show up in the 2000s and 1000s a year or two later.
The ASICS GT 1000 retails for 110 dollars. The other budget friendly stability trainer it competes with is the Brooks Launch GTS. The 13th edition has undergone some minor changes throughout the shoe.
They are a lightweight younger brother of the GT 2000 and Kayano. There was a responsiveness to them I hadn’t experienced in past editions. The cushioning stood out as well, especially in the heel portion. The tightness felt in the last edition (12th) seemed to be resolved i in this edition.
The maiden voyage in the GT 1000 13 was a 2 and ½ mile run. It was a stiff run and the cushioning was slightly uncomfortable. I was hoping this wasn’t a sign of what was to come.
The upper of the ASICS GT 1000 has a new engineered mesh. It is a breathable mesh upper with supportive overlays that ensure a snug fit without feeling too tight. The updated design enhances ventilation, keeps your feet cool and dry during long runs.
This edition has a finicky lacing system due to the short length of the laces. It was hard to get a secure fit with the length of them. There was a tightness around the top of the lacing system.
The amount of cushioning in the heel doesn’t help with the tightness that was experienced. There is too much between the amount in the tongue and inthe heel collar. It is overbearing and makes for an uncomfortable fit. Luckily, the rest of the upper gives you a secure and comfortable fit from midfoot to toebox.
The GT-1000 fit is true to size. There are no overlays so there were no issues with points of irritation or blisters. Because of the lacing/tying and cushioning issues the upper of the GT-1000 was a disappointment.
ASICS’ FLYTEFOAM makes up the midsole of the GT 1000. It continues to be lightweight foam that has a hint of firmness to it. The midsole is also cushioned with ASICS’ signature GEL technology, offering a plush yet responsive ride. While it performs well with impact absorption, it struggles with energy return on toe offs.
The 3D Guidance System makes its first appearance in this edition of the GT 1000. This replaced the LITERUSS support system, a dual density medial post. This holistic system consists of wider basenets, increased heel bevel, midsole flare and lateral guidance line. This system is effective at providing natural stability when you need it. One drawback is it makes the shoe noticeably wider.
The midsole underwent some big changes with this edition. The 3D Guidance System is an improvement in the stability provided. It is a holistic and dynamic approach that works. On the flip side the midsole is bigger as part of the system. This is noticeable and you feel it while running. It is also great at impact absorption but struggles with energy return.
The new engineered mesh was an improvement in both breathability and durability. The drawbacks outnumbered the strengths of the upper.
The lacing system continued to be finicky as a result of short laces. This caused an uncomfortable tightness felt at the top of the lacing system. What added to the discomfort was too much cushioning in the tongue and heel collar. The fit was ideal in the midfoot and toebox but much of the time spent running in these my attention was turned to the discomfort of the back portion.
Overall, the ASICS GT 1000 13 remains a middle of the road trainer for me. This 13th edition of the GT 1000 brings enhanced responsiveness and cushioning, though it does fall short in energy return on toe-off.
The new 3D Guidance System adds effective stability features but makes the shoe noticeably wider, which may not suit everyone.
The upper’s performance is mixed. The engineered mesh offers good breathability and a generally snug fit, but the short laces and excess cushioning around the heel can create discomfort. For these reasons I would steer runners to the GT-2000 or Kayano.
3 months ago
I’m curious how these compare to the Asics GT-2000 series. Does anyone know if there’s a big difference in stability and comfort?
3 months ago
I’ve been using the GT-1000 series for a while now, and I can say the 13th version lives up to expectations! They did a fantastic job keeping the balance between support and comfort. The shoes are great for daily runs, especially with the improved cushioning and breathable upper. However, I did notice they feel slightly stiffer compared to earlier models, which took a bit of getting used to. Durability seems solid, no issues so far after over 100 miles. Keep it up, ASICS!