If you overpronate and you need a supportive, light stability trainer with no poking arch sensation, the Clifton 10 is an option.
If you found the Clifton 9 too soft and too narrow, the Clifton 10 could be a good option for you.
If you want a really fun, bouncy ride that feels engaging, do not get the Clifton 10.
If you don’t enjoy rearfoot guidance during transitions, the Clifton 10 is not for you.
Sometimes HOKA can surprise us with really exciting shoes like the wild-riding Cielo X1, or the explosive Mach X 2, which is one of the fastest, most energetic speed trainers on the market.
The Clifton is not one of those products. The Clifton is the equivalent of a peanut butter and jam sandwich for lunch- it will satisfy your hunger but it’s a boring meal that you’ve had hundreds of times before. And that’s completely fine. Hoka understands that it’s all about having a balanced product assortment.
In 2024, HOKA experienced remarkable financial growth, with its revenue surging by an impressive 28%. This substantial increase highlights HOKA’s continuance of strong performance in the running footwear market.
When compared to its main competitors, HOKA’s growth significantly outpaced the industry. Nike saw a modest revenue increase of only 1%. Adidas achieved a growth rate of 12%. Under Armour faced a downturn, with its revenue dropping by 3% during the same period.
These figures underscore HOKA’s exceptional growth trajectory and its increasing market share relative to its competitors. HOKA’s 2 main bestsellers are the Clifton and the Bondi.
Both of these trainers have new versions released every 2 years. In 2025, we get new versions of both the Clifton and the Bondi. When I reviewed the Clifton 9 in 2023, I felt that it was a good daily trainer but it was more suited to easy and recovery runs.
The big headline feature of the Clifton 10 is that it has an additional 3 mm more stack height in the heel. It’s also built on a wider last compared to previous Cliftons. The Clifton has always been a very narrow-fitting trainer. I recommended that runners get the wide version of the Clifton because the regular is only suitable for very narrow feet.
The Clifton 10 sees yet another price increase to $150. It has now increased by $20 over the last 2 versions. The Clifton 8’s price was $130. These days, the average price for a mid-range daily trainer is $140.
The first time I put the Clifton 10 on, I was impressed with the new last. I ordered the regular version (not the wide) in my normal size, and the forefoot and toe box felt a lot more spacious than previous versions.
My first run was an easy one and I was surprised how firm the ride felt. The Clifton has never been a super soft ride but I was expecting the 10th version to be plusher since it has more stack height in the heel. It felt firmer than version 9 to me.
It felt similar to the Clifton 8, which was a firmer, more versatile iteration than the 9. The Clifton 10 felt like it could pick up the pace if you needed it to, like a text book daily trainer and not a max-cushioned trainer for only easy runs.
This is the most comfortable Clifton upper to date because of its wider forefoot and toe box. You no longer need to buy the wide version or buy a half size up unless you have very wide feet.
The Clifton 10’s jacquard knit upper is a bit softer and a bit smoother than its predecessor but breathability is still not that great. It also has a generously padded tongue and collar so it’s more suited to cool climates than warm ones.
The tongue is not gusseted so there’s a little bit of downward tongue slide during runs, even though it has 2 lace loops on the tongue. The Clifton 9’s tongue, which was attached on one side was a much better design. Foot lockdown is good and there’s no heel slippage when using a runner’s knot.
I’ve been using the Clifton 10 every day for the past week, sometimes even twice a day for my doubles. What I’ve found is that the midsole is too firm for me. After some runs, I’ll notice that my feet hurt because of the firmness.
The Clifton 10 is now significantly firmer than other recent daily trainers like the ASICS Novablast 5, Nike Vomero 18, Saucony Ride 18 and New Balance 1080 v14. It’s also worth noting that the Bondi 9 is now softer than the Clifton 10. In previous years, the Clifton was the softer of the 2 maximalist HOKA trainers.
The Clifton 10 midsole is still made of CMEVA (compression-molded EVA), just like the 9 versions that came before it. It’s a very light, airy foam but it doesn’t offer much in terms of energy return or bounce. What the Clifton’s midsole does very well is that it provides a lot of support. It’s a very stable ride because the foam isn’t squishy.
Due to its firmer ride, the Clifton 10 now feels more like a daily trainer than a max-cushioned trainer like its predecessor. It’s easier to pick up the pace in the Clifton 10 so you can do steady runs and even short, fast bursts in it.
The MetaRocker midsole shape is still one of the Clifton’s signature features. It gently assists you through transitions so it feels more efficient and easier to run in the Clifton than in other trainers with flat midsoles.
The Clifton 10 has an extra 3 mm stack height in its heel and it’s now an 8 mm drop for the first time in the franchise history- it has always been 5 mm. HOKA said that they did this because over the life of the shoe, the heel compresses and this makes the drop even lower. With an 8 mm drop, the geometry holds up better over time.
Another new feature is the rearfoot active foot frame. This means that the sides of the midsole at the rearfoot are raised up (like barriers) to create guidance as your heels strike the ground.
Essentially, the Clifton 10 is a light stability trainer. I don’t enjoy this guidance feature because the raised midsole edges create a pressure point on the medial side of my rearfoot that overpronates. During runs longer than 10 kilometres, the inside of my rearfoot gets sore.
Outsole durability is not one of the Clifton 10’s strengths. The rubber (and exposed midsole foam) are very soft and they wear down faster than your average outsole. I’ve done over 110 km in my pair, and there’s significant wear on the outer lateral heel areas.
The Clifton 10 is not my kind of daily trainer. It’s relatively lightweight (for its high stack height) but it’s not soft or plush like HOKA advertises. I prefer my daily trainers to be squishier and more energetic so it won’t be staying in my rotation.
Version 10 is a disappointing update for me and it’s a less fun version than 9. It has a firmer ride and it tries to guide your rearfoot during transitions which caused me some issues during longer runs.
The 10 will be better for you if you have wider feet or you need more stability but I prefer the plusher, more neutral Clifton 9. The Clifton 10 is however more versatile since its firmer ride makes it easier to pick up the pace.
At $150, the Clifton 10 is overpriced, especially considering it only has an EVA midsole that’s not even super critically foamed. Its competitors (Adidas Supernova Rise, ASICS Novablast, Saucony Ride, Brooks Ghost) are all cheaper and more comfortable than the Clifton. They also provide more energy return and have more engaging rides.
Most runners and walkers will prefer the HOKA Bondi 9 over the Clifton 10. The Bondi is $20 more but it has a super critically foamed EVA midsole which feels plusher and has a more lively ride. It also has more rockered transitions and an outsole with better durability.
3 weeks ago
Coming from the Clifton 9 that I bought 3 times because I loved it so much. I ran 3 ultras in it. I was pretty worried after reading your review. I bought the 10 with a little reluctance but after 100 k, I have to say I enjoy it a lot. It´s a little firmer than the 9, but not that I find it uncomfortable. Will probably remain my go-to shoe for long distance. Though the Mizuno Neo Vista has become a strong competitor.
1 month ago
After putting 200 miles on the Clifton 10, I can confidently say it’s firmer than previous versions. The extra 3mm stack height is noticeable and provides good protection for long runs, but I miss the softer feel of the 9. Used these for everything from easy 5 milers to a recent half marathon. The wider forefoot is a welcome change – no more pinching in the toe box. The stability features, especially those guidance rails, took some getting used to. Compared to my Saucony Ride 16s, these feel more structured but less springy. They shine on steady-state runs but aren’t as fun for tempo work. Durability has been solid so far, especially in high-wear areas. A good daily trainer, but not quite as versatile as previous versions.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
My usual route has about 2 miles of packed gravel – would these handle that okay? Been using the Bondi but want something lighter. Also curious how they grip in the rain since my area gets pretty wet in spring.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
First-time Hoka buyer here! Been running in Nikes (10.5) but ready to try something different. My local store is out of stock – can anyone tell me how cushy these are compared to the Bondi 8? Also worried about sizing since I’ve heard Hokas can run small. Don’t want to deal with returns if I can help it!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
My trusty Clifton 8s are on their last legs after 500 miles. Been hearing the 10s are firmer – anyone switched from 8 to 10? I’m a neutral runner doing mostly easy miles and don’t want anything too structured.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Having logged 200+ miles in the Clifton 10, I can definitively say these are more stable than previous versions. The wider platform and increased stack height work well for my daily training needs, typically 5-8 mile runs. While I miss the softer feel of the Clifton 9, the firmer ride helps with picking up the pace when needed. I’ve found these especially good for progression runs where you start easy and finish at tempo pace. The guidance rails took about 50 miles to get used to, but now I appreciate the subtle support. Compared to the Bondi 8, these feel more versatile though less cushioned. Despite the weight increase, they remain a solid daily trainer.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Been running in these daily for over 200 miles now. If you loved the pillowy-soft Clifton 9, heads up – these are definitely firmer. The extra height and wider base make them super stable for those sleepy morning runs when form gets sloppy. Took about 50 miles to break in those guidance rails, but now they feel great. They’ve been my go-to for everything from easy recovery days to longer 15-milers. Not as peppy as the Mach 6, but perfect for building base miles. Outsole still looks brand new despite all the miles. Great reliable trainer if you’re not looking for anything fancy.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Hey runners! Got my eye on the Clifton 10 but struggling with sizing. I’ve got wider feet and always had to get the wide Bondis – anyone know if these new Cliftons are more forgiving in the toebox? Also a bit worried about how long they’ll last since I heard the ride is firmer now. I do about 30 miles a week if that helps!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
The best running shoes for easy run and long Run
3 months ago
Just tried these on at Fleet Feet and man, that wider toebox is such a change! Been running in Cliftons since the 7 and these feel pretty different. Not sure how I feel about the firmer ride – my Clifton 9s are like clouds in comparison. Feels more stable though, which might be good for my longer runs. Think I’ll wait for a sale before pulling the trigger.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
well, first off, i did my first run, a Fartlek believe it or not, in the Clifton 10 today – and WOW, it was Unbelievable. I always wondered what all the Hoka Hype was about, and now i know! I had the exact opposite experience with the Clifton 10 today than the review here. I always use this site for learning about new running shoes and all the info is great. But with the Clifton- it was extremely ‘fun’ and had way more bounce than any shoe i’ve ever run in. The cushioning was super deep comparted to anything i’ve run in before- mainly Asics Gel Kayanos, GT1000s, Brooks Glycerins, Ghosts, Launches, Saucony Rides, and my current last 2 shoes have both been Nike Pegasus, the 34 and the 39. I needed something a bit slower and more cushioned than the Pegasus 39. Well, the Clifton is perfect – i could still pick up the pace a bit with no issue, but i love that easy paces are no issue at all in the Clifton. The guidance system was un-noticeable here and it felt very stable which was welcomed here after coming from an ankle injury from last winter.
so – all in all i give the Clifton 10 a 10/10 rating and recommend as a fun and bouncy shoe with a lot of cushion for recovery runs, or daily training with slower to mid paces.
3 months ago
Finally upgrading my beat-up Ghosts and eyeing the Clifton 10 for my easy days. Anyone else with a wider forefoot try these? My local store didn’t have them in stock to try on. Also a bit worried about those stability features – my feet are neutral and I don’t want anything getting in the way of my natural stride.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Tried these on at my local running store after wearing Clifton 9s for the past year. The wider toebox is definitely noticeable and welcome. However, the firmer ride was quite different from what I’m used to with Hokas. Will probably stick with the 9s until they wear out before considering an upgrade. The $150 price point seems fair given the updates though.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.