Saucony Triumph RFG review

9 expert score
9 user's score
As editorial policy, we do not accept free samples. We purchased this pair at Running Warehouse with our own money.
Review written on 29th January by Michael Mason-D'Croz Long distance runner, shoe expert.
91 other reviews

Saucony Triumph RFG Verdict

The Saucony Triumph Run For Good is a fantastic long offering that is moving the business in the right direction with sustainable materials. Soft, bouncy and well designed, it’s a joy in which to log miles.

The pros

  • The cushion is fantastically soft, reminds of earlier Triumphs
  • Traction is amazing, grip on all surfaces
  • Good bounce to push the pace
  • Well-know and tested platform
  • First shoe from Saucony that focuses on being sustainable.

The cons

  • Takes a while to break in.
  • Upper is not very breathable.
  • A little heavy

Rating breakdown

Comfort
10
Build quality
10
Upper
8.0
Sole unit
9.0
Landing
8.0
Transition
8.0
Toe-off
9.0
Traction
10
Durability
10
Value / Price
8.0

Facts / Specs

Brand
Model
Triumph RFG
Family
Weight
10.4 oz (295 g)
MSRP
$160.00

Heel
39 mm.
Toe
29 mm.
Heel drop
10 mm.
Carbon plate
No plate

Size/Fit

Sizing
True to size
Heel fit
Tight
Midfoot fit
Normal
Toebox fit
Normal

Cushioning & ride

Type of cushioning
Balanced/plush
Amount of cushioning
Highly cushioned
Stability
Not particularly stable
Flexibility
Rigid

Usage

Racing
Speedwork
Daily training  
Long distance racing
Ultra distance racing

Who should buy the Saucony Triumph RFG ?

These are for the runner who wants to lessen impact on the environment while still having a product that can log all the miles they want. Heavy-duty enough to take on the long runs, while bouncy enough to handle tempos.

Who should not buy the Saucony Triumph RFG ?

If you need lots of stability, this shoe isn’t for you. It’s more stable than the Triumph 21, but not to the point of offering support for runners needing it.

Saucony Triumph RFG Introduction

Picture of Saucony Triumph RFG

The Saucony Triumph RFG is a premium daily trainer with a twist. Years of advancement in technologies have resulted in shoes with more bounce, softer cushion, and faster times. However, these advancements have sometimes come at the cost of higher carbon output.

Saucony took on the task of trying to develop a premium trainer while lowering the carbon footprint of the shoe. The result?
The Triumph RunForGood.

Due to this work, the main competitor of the RFG is the original Triumph, but it will also go up against the likes of the New Balance 1080, Hoka Clifton, Brooks Glycerin, Nike Vomero, Asics Gel Nimbus, and adidas Boston.

Can it hold up against all these premium models that have a firm track record? That’s what I wanted to find out.

Saucony Triumph RFG First Impressions

Picture of Saucony Triumph RFG

When these showed up I was excited to see what a Triumph that is a “step forward” for low-carbon manufacturing would be like.

How would they look different from the original shoe? The answer was, they will look simpler. Gone was the light upper with advanced fabric featuring 3D printed inlays. Instead what arrived was a simple woven upper with embroidered logos.

No frills, nothing flashy, and it was beautiful in its simplicity. I didn’t know how I’d react, but I was very pleasantly surprised and loved them right away.

On the feet, they were great. Maybe a bit heavier, and stiffer than the Triumph 21 straight out of the box, but they were comfortable, and had a lot of cushion. They performed very well during my first run, going 5k with a good amount of bounce.

However, they did feel as though they needed a little break-in time, as they were a bit stiff in both the upper and sole unit.

That said, this shoe made a great first impression to me.

Saucony Triumph RFG Upper

Picture of Saucony Triumph RFG

For the upper, Saucony moved away from the thin engineered mesh and 3D printed layers that are on the Triumph 21s, and moved back toward the older knit upper from years ago. This knit upper uses sustainable cotton with plant-based dyes to add color.

Due to these materials, the shoe will not be offered in a variety of colors but instead just the main “coffee” color offered at the moment.

Picture of Saucony Triumph RFG

This knit upper gives good support and uses an adaptive lacing system to keep your foot locked in. The combination of the thicker material and lacing system means your foot is always secured during the run without too many overlays.

This upper fit true to size for my size 13, while having the same foot profile as the regular Triumph 21. The heel is fairly narrow, the midfoot is a regular width that then opens into a wider (but not super wide) toe box.

Saucony Triumph RFG Sole Unit

Picture of Saucony Triumph RFG

For the Saucony Triumph RFG, the sole unit is the most important piece, as this is where they have spent the most time, energy, and money developing a sustainable material. Partnering with CovationBio PDO to produce PWRRUN BIO+, a midsole featuring 55% Susterra® propanediol. This material is created from regeneratively grown dent corn, so as to cut down on carbon emissions and move toward sustainability.

Saucony put 39mm of this cushion under the heel and 29mm under the toe for a 10mm drop. The cushion itself is very soft, and provides a good bounce. Although not as ready to run as the original Triumph 21 out of the box, once the break-in period is finished, this is a very soft and bouncy ride.

Picture of Saucony Triumph RFG

Under the PWRRUN BIO+ the company uses 80% natural gum rubber which offers superior traction while also being a sustainable material. This outsole performed well in a variety of weather conditions, including ice/snow/rain. I was very impressed with the overall grip.

Saucony uses a Tri-Fold outsole design to promote flexibility of the shoe for transition from impact to toe-off. However, this is perhaps the one section of the shoe that I felt let me down. They felt quite stiff for a decent number of miles, and although that improved as I broke them in, the stiffness never fully went away.

Saucony Triumph RFG Conclusions

Picture of Saucony Triumph RFG

When I heard about the Saucony Triumph RFG, I wondered if it was a gimmick. I love the idea of being more sustainable and using renewable materials. However, how was this going to be accomplished while still being a Triumph?

Well, Saucony did a great job. This shoe offers the feel of a Triumph–not the same exact feel as the 21s–while using sustainable materials and coming in at the same price point.

Many times, sustainable means higher price, but that is not the case here. However, you’re going to get less performance for the price than if you went with the 21s. The trade off of sustainability or performance is real here.

The sole unit is stiff out of the box, but with plenty of cushion. This cushion breaks in nicely over the span of about 15 miles–although the upper might take a little longer to break in as well–and becomes bouncy and soft. My latest run in these was a great feeling 10-mile where they felt bouncy the entire time.

However, one of the biggest issues I had with this shoe was the long break-in time. I’m so used to shoes being ready to go out of the box, that the fact that it took me 25-30 miles before they were fully broken in–and about half that for the cushion to break in–was a little annoying.

The other things that stuck out to me negatively about these shoes were their weight and breathability. Unfortunately, the shoes weighed in at around 11.7oz (size 13) – which was about an ounce more than the Triumph 21s do. This isn’t a huge deal, but you can feel it as you try to run.

The bigger negative was the breathability of the upper. This was evident during a couple of untimely warm days when I ran in them. When the temps went over 80F (27C), my feet got overly hot on a couple of the runs. However, this turned into a positive during the turn into winter weather and cold runs, as it kept my feet insulated.

How does the RFG compare to the 21s?

Cushion
Triumph 21: More bounce, more flexible.
Triumph RFG: Less bounce/flexibility, but plenty there for all runs. I think the PWRRUN BIO+ is maybe a little softer.

Outsole
Triumph 21: XT-900 Carbon Rubber that focuses on being lightweight. Good, but not amazing, grip.
Triumph RFG: Natural gum rubber outsole. Slightly heavier, but better for the environment. Superior grip to the 21s, better shoe on snow/ice/wet surfaces.

Upper
Triumph 21: Engineered mesh, 3D overlays, very tuned in and ready for competitive running if needed. Very breathable.
Triumph RFG: More old-school knit upper. Less breathability, but warmer for colder runs. No overlays (embroidered logo), but a great lace locking system.

Tongue/Lacing
Nearly identical

Overall
Triumph 21: A slightly better product for pushing the limits and for running competitively. I found the cushion more conducive to running fast.
Triumph RFG: I enjoyed running my long runs in this pair more than the 21s. I did two long runs consecutively with each shoe and although I was slightly slower with the RFG, I enjoyed the ride a little more and felt less pain in my feet after.

Overall, this shoe was a winner in my mind. The cushion was plush and great as soon as it was broken in, the upper comfortable and warm. If you are eco-conscious, this is a great first foray into friendlier shoes.

The goal of these shoes is admirable, and the execution is great.

How does the Triumph RFG compare?

Saucony Triumph 21
Saucony Triumph RFG
Saucony Ride 17
Expert score
9
9
9
User score
Retail price
US$159.95
US$159.95
US$140
Weight
10 oz
10.4 oz
10.1 oz
Heel Drop
10 mm
10 mm
8 mm
Recommended for
Daily training
Daily training
Daily training
Cushioning type
balanced/plush
balanced/plush
responsive/balanced
Cushioning amount
Highly cushioned
Highly cushioned
Medium cushioning
Flexibility
medium
rigid
flexible
Stability
not particularly stable
not particularly stable
very stable
Sizing
true to size
true to size
true to size

Why you can trust us

As editorial policy, we do not accept free samples from companies.
We purchased this pair of Saucony at Running Warehouse  with our own money.

This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Read more about our policy.

Reviewed by Michael

This review was written by Michael Mason-D'Croz on 29th January.
Michael Mason-D’Croz lives in Lincoln, Nebraska, working as a Spanish Teacher and soccer coach. Because training isn’t enough, he gets to chase around his almost 2-year-old daughter when he gets home from work and runs. On his free time — what little of it there is — he likes to play board games and sample tasty local beers.

User feedback (2)

  • avatar-comment-1040588
    Laura M.
    2 days ago

    I really love the sustainable approach they’ve taken with the Triumph RFG, but my question is, how does its durability compare to the traditional Saucony Triumph 20? With the eco-friendly materials, will it last the same amount of miles?

  • avatar-comment-1035103
    Henrik
    8 months ago
    9 score

    Never had a Triumph before – the RFG is really comfortable – ran i cold weather so breatheability was not an issue.

Lowest price:
$159

Where to buy

Best offers today in United States, all prices in USD

Similar shoes to Saucony Triumph RFG

Saucony Endorphin Elite 2 Review

The Saucony Endorphin Elite 2 is an extremely soft and squishy racer which ... (Read expert review)

Saucony Kinvara 15 Review

The Saucony Kinvara 15 is a lightweight daily trainer that is meant for speed ... (Read expert review)

Saucony Triumph 22 Review

The Saucony Triumph 22 is a good max-cushioned trainer which is best suited to ... (Read expert review)