If money isn’t an issue and you want the lightest marathon racer, the Evo 1 is a good option.
If you like the Adios Pro 3 but you find it too heavy and too firm, the Evo 1 is the perfect shoe for you.
If you want a durable racer which doubles up as a trainer, the Evo 1 is not the shoe for you.
If you’re a runner who needs a stable, structured racer, you should give the Evo 1 a miss.
Every now and again, a running shoe is launched which moulds the future of running shoe design and dictates how future shoes will perform. The Nike Vaporfly 4% was one of these examples and the Adios Pro Evo 1 is now another.
There used to be a time when elite marathon runners would wear racing flats because they believed that a lighter shoe meant a faster time. But in order to use these racing flats for long distances, you needed to have exquisite running form and feet which are tough as nails. Most non-elite runners weren’t able to race a marathon in flats.
Then came the more forgiving Nike Vaporfly 4% with its stiff carbon plate inside a thick 31 mm/21 mm, cushy midsole. It offered much more cushioning, protection and speed assistance.
As midsoles got thicker and foams became more responsive, race record times dropped lower and lower. World Athletics then set rules for competition shoes. The midsole can’t be above 40 mm in stack height and there can only be 1 stiffening device in the midsole.
Brands now have to think outside the box about how they can make their super shoes faster without breaking the rules. 1 of the ways is to decrease the weight of the shoe.
Adidas has previously toyed with the idea of super light racing shoes. They used to have a racing flat called the Adizero Sub 2 which weighed only 5.6 oz (160 g). This shoe was designed to help athletes race a marathon in under 2 hours, but that never happened.
The Sub 2 racer had a flat ride, didn’t have much cushioning and didn’t provide much speed assistance. Adidas’ latest innovation, the Adios Pro Evo 1 combines the benefits of a super-light racing flat weight with the speed assistance of a maximalist carbon-plated super shoe.
The Pro Evo 1 is a concept shoe which is made available for the public to buy. This not only creates hype for Adidas but also gives the shoe credibility because non-elite runners are able to test it out for themselves to see that it’s the real deal. This is something that more brands should do.
There were only 1025 pairs of the shoes made- mine is number 910. I managed to buy the Evo 1 through a raffle on Running Warehouse and at the time of the writing of this review, there is still stock available on the Running Warehouse website for purchase.
The Adios Pro Evo 1 weighs just 4.87 oz (138 g) in a men’s US9. This is an entire 3 oz (85 g) less than the Adidas Adios Pro 3. It has a 39/33 mm stack height with a 6 mm drop. It costs $500, double the price of the “more affordable” and more widely available Adios Pro 3.
So why is it so expensive? Adidas carves each Evo 1 midsole out of a block of foam using a technique called CNC (computer numerical control) milling. To do this takes a lot of time, skill and excess material waste. Adidas probably makes very little profit, if any, on this shoe.
My first run in the Evo 1 was a 10K race on a hilly course. I hadn’t done any training runs in it before that because I wanted to save it for race day so it was a bit risky to race in it.
I can remember walking to the start line and feeling like I was forgetting something because it felt like I wasn’t wearing any shoes due to its weight. The upper also felt really comfortable and the size was perfect: snug but secure.
It needed no break-in period and within the first 500 metres, I could tell that the Evo 1 had a softer ride than the Adios Pro 3. I could also tell that their rockers were different; the Adios Pro 3’s rocker felt more prominent while the Evo 1’s rocker felt more subdued.
I was really amazed with how it performed during that race. My time was 40:27. It wasn’t a PB because the route had 135 m (443 f) of elevation gain but during the late stages of the race, from kilometres 7-10, the featherweight build made my legs feel much fresher than they usually would feel. The lightweight build also made tackling the steep hills much easier.
This is the thinnest, most minimal upper I’ve ever put my feet into. The plastic-feeling mesh feels thinner than some ziplock bags and I feel like I have to be gentle with it so that I don’t tear a hole in it. Breathability is excellent and it doesn’t absorb sweat.
There isn’t as much padding in the collar and heel tab as in the Adios Pro 3 so the Evo 1 doesn’t have very good heel lockdown. There’s also no heel counter so even using a runner’s knot, my heel feels loose but there isn’t any heel slippage.
The Evo 1 is true to size with the traditional Adidas narrow last. It has a snug, racing fit with a low toe-box height. It’s best suited to narrow, low-volume feet.
My height is 170 cm, my weight is 60 kilograms and I’m a heel striker. These are important stats because I’ve done 80 kilometres in the Evo 1 and it shows absolutely no signs of degradation. The cushioning now is just as responsive as my first run in it.
Adidas says that it’s designed to perform optimally for only 1 marathon race but that will depend on your weight and running form. I estimate that I will be able to run at least 2-3 marathons in it, in addition to the 80 kilometres I have already put on it.
They also state on the card that comes with it that it’s designed for runners who can run 3 hours 30 minutes or faster for a full marathon. My PB is 3 hours so I should be able to get the full Evo 1 experience.
My testing consisted of a 10K race, and two hard 35 kilometre long runs. The Evo 1 excelled at both distances and at a variety of paces. While some of the other lightweight racers don’t have enough cushioning for a full marathon, the Evo 1 has more than enough and I will definitely be racing a marathon in it this year. It also feels comfortable at slower paces due to its forgiving, “friendly” ride.
The Lightstrike Pro Evo foam that makes up the midsole of the Evo 1 is made from PEBA and it provides a softer ride than regular Lightstrike Pro. It feels fluffier and it has a higher compression rate. It feels as if they’ve injected Nitrogen into it to make it lighter and less dense.
The energy return isn’t as high as the regular Lightstrike Pro because of how much your feet sink down into the foam every time you load it. The ride of the Evo 1 feels plusher than the Adios Pro 3 and plusher than most flagship super shoes.
I find the Evo 1 most impressive in the late stages of runs when my legs begin to tire. Normally it feels like I’m dragging my feet, but in the Evo 1, I can maintain my pace or even speed up. It gives me the ability to “open fire” close to the end.
The rocker of the Evo 1 is at 60% of the length of the shoe. The rocker of the Adios Pro 3 is at 70% in comparison.
The longer rocker in the Evo results in a gentler, rolling transition compared to the Adios Pro which has a more aggressive, forward-tipping transition. I prefer the Adios Pro 3’s rocker but I suspect the Evo 1’s midsole is too soft for that setup as the rods would poke into your feet through the soft foam.
The Energy Rods inside the Evo 1’s midsole are super stiff, just like the ones in the Adios Pro 3 but they are able to move vertically independently. This results in highly efficient transitions and a more forgiving ride (than a carbon plate) during slow paces.
One of the big differences between the Evo 1 and other racers is that the Evo doesn’t have an insole so there’s less step-in comfort. Your feet sit directly on the strobel lining. During runs, I don’t notice the absence of the insole except towards the ends of long runs.
Besides providing more cushioning, an insole also absorbs sweat from your feet, but in the Evo Pro 1, the sweat doesn’t disappear down into the insole. During the end of long runs, it feels as if my feet are completely drenched which isn’t comfortable.
The Evo 1 feels more unstable than the Adios Pro 3. The edges of the Evo 1 midsole are much softer (30%) than a midsole which has been compression moulded so it has less structure and is less supportive. When cornering, I have to slow down more than I do in the Adios Pro. If you need a racer with stability, the Evo 1 might not be suitable for you.
The outsole durability of the Evo 1 has impressed me the most. Apart from some discolouring, the outsole still looks perfect after 80 kilometres with no dents, scratches or chips.
The Evo 1’s biggest weakness is outsole traction. I used it when it was drizzling lightly and I found the road extremely slippery where there were painted lines on the road. It makes sense now why the Adidas elite athletes used Evo 1’s with modified outsoles during the Berlin Marathon.
The Adidas Adios Pro Evo 1 is the fastest running shoe I’ve tested.
While it doesn’t provide as much propulsion as other racers which are more aggressive, its featherweight build makes it feel faster and more efficient than competitors.
Its midsole foam isn’t as explosive as other super foams due to how squishy it is but it doesn’t feel sluggish or energy sapping.
It’s certainly not a gimmick and if money was no issue, this is the racer I would buy and lace up for all my races.
But if money is an issue, I wouldn’t recommend the Evo Pro 1 because it’s not worth 2 pairs of Adios Pro 3, Edge Paris or Vaporfly 3.
The Evo 1 is not for most runners. It’s for professional athletes to break records and it’s for running shoe geeks who want to experience the pinnacle of racing shoes. For $500, you get to experience the future.
The term “game-changer” is thrown around very often these days but it really does aptly apply to the Evo 1. In a year from now, every major brand will have a sub-5 oz marathon racer. There are already some Chinese racers which weigh less than the Evo 1.
This is good news not only for serious runners but for casual runners too because these lightweight racing foams will eventually filter down to the more affordable shoes.
The upcoming Adios Pro 4 already has Lightstrike Pro Evo foam inserts in its midsole.
1 month ago
Hey runners! I’m eyeing these for my first marathon but that price tag is making me nervous. Anyone know how long they actually last compared to the Adios Pro 3? Not sure if I should splash out on these or go with something more forgiving for my first 26.2.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
Just tried these on at Fleet Feet – holy cow, they’re lighter than my racing flats! Yeah, the price made me wince, but after feeling how responsive they are, I’m seriously tempted. My Vaporflys are on their last legs and I’ve got Boston coming up in spring. Anyone else bite the bullet on these?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.1 month ago
Managed to try these at a local demo day and wow – they’re insanely light! But $500 for basically a one-and-done marathon shoe? My Vaporflys were way cheaper and still going strong. That missing insole felt super weird too, like running straight on foam. Cool tech but think I’ll pass on this one.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
As an elite marathon runner, I’ve tested the Adios Pro Evo 1 extensively over the past month, including a recent marathon PR. The featherlight weight is game-changing – it feels like you’re barely wearing shoes. The cushioning-to-weight ratio is incredible, providing ample protection without the bulk. I’ve done tempo runs, long runs, and race-pace workouts in these. While they excel in dry conditions, I did notice significant slipping on wet surfaces. Compared to the Nike Alphafly 3, these feel more natural and less aggressive in their geometry. The lack of insole hasn’t been an issue for me, though they do get quite sweaty. I’d rate these a solid 9/10 – nearly perfect for racing, only marked down for the wet traction issue and price point.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Been eyeing these for my fall marathon but man, $500 is steep! Anyone know how long they actually last? My local shop couldn’t give me a straight answer. Also nervous about that no-insole thing – normally wear 10.5 in adidas but wondering if I should size up?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Bit the bullet and got these for my Boston Marathon – best decision ever! Can’t believe how light they are (138g) but still enough cushion for the full distance. Just crushed my half marathon PR with a 1:22 and they felt amazing. Way more efficient than my old Vaporflys. Only complaints: feet get pretty sweaty without an insole, and they’re sketchy on wet roads. Durability is actually decent – holding up well after 100 miles. Expensive but worth every penny if you’re hunting PRs. These are seriously the fastest shoes I’ve ever raced in.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Used these for my recent marathon PR attempt and they absolutely delivered! At 4.8oz, they feel impossibly light yet still offer enough cushioning for the full 26.2. The foam compound is perfectly tuned – responsive without being harsh like some carbon racers. I’ve tried most super shoes (Vaporfly, Alphafly, Metaspeed) and these are now my clear favorite for marathon racing. The lockdown could be better but the energy return and efficiency more than make up for it. Ran a 2:45 marathon in them and my legs felt fresher than expected afterwards. Be careful in the rain though – they get pretty slippery.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Tried these on at my local running store yesterday. The lightweight feel is incredible – like nothing I’ve ever experienced. But $500 for one marathon? That’s steep even by super shoe standards. The lack of insole made them feel a bit strange and I noticed some heel slip. Think I’ll stick with my trusty Vaporflys for now.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Okay, real talk – are these worth FIVE HUNDRED bucks?! Been using Vaporflys for marathons but curious if anyone’s made the splurge. Pretty wild they’re only supposed to last one race… my wallet’s already crying thinking about it!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Seriously considering these for Boston 2024 but that price tag is intense! Anyone know if they’ll actually last through a full training cycle? Got a rainy race day last year and worried about slipping with that outsole. Would love real-world feedback before dropping half a grand on these.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Bit the bullet and got these for my Boston qualifier. After three tough training runs and race day, I can say they’re worth the crazy price tag. Never felt a shoe this light that still protects your legs this well. Different feel from my old VaporFlys – less bouncy but more natural. Only complaint is they get pretty swampy without the insole. Landed that BQ with a 3:28, knocking 4 minutes off my PR! Won’t be using these for every race (hoping they last more than a few runs), but for that special race? Pure magic.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
After splurging on these super shoes, I’ve put them through two marathons and several speed sessions. The lightweight feel is unmatched – took 4 minutes off my marathon PR (2:45:20) at Chicago. The cushioning-to-weight ratio is remarkable compared to my previous Vaporfly Next% 2. While the lack of an insole caused some sweating issues during humid races, the energy return during prolonged efforts is exceptional. Used them for a 10K tune-up race (35:45) and they felt incredibly responsive. The lockdown could be better – had to really crank the laces during my tempo runs. Despite the premium price, the performance benefits for racing are undeniable. Just keep them dry – they’re treacherous on wet surfaces as I learned during a rainy training run.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
After using these in two marathons (2:58 and 3:02), I can confidently say these are the lightest and fastest shoes I’ve ever worn. The cushioning-to-weight ratio is incredible – they feel like nothing on foot but still protect you over the full 26.2. Compared to my Vaporflys, these feel more natural and less aggressive. The only real issue is wet traction, which got sketchy during some light rain. While expensive, they’ve held up better than expected though I do notice some midsole compression. The barefoot-style fit takes getting used to but disappears once you’re running. An amazing race day weapon if you can justify the price.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Been eyeing these for my fall marathon but man, $500 is steep! Anyone actually putting serious miles on these? Really curious how long they last in real training, not just race day. Also worried about blisters without an insole – my feet tend to get pretty sweaty during longer races.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Just checked these out at my local running shop – wow, they feel like feathers! That price tag though… ouch. Not sure how I feel about dropping that much cash on shoes that might only last one marathon. Maybe I’ll wait for more reviews from people who’ve actually raced in them.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
Hey runners! Training for Chicago Marathon and eyeing these super shoes. They’re pretty expensive though – anyone know how long they actually last? My local shop only had a 9, but I normally wear 8.5 in my adidas trainers. Wondering if I should grab the 9 or wait for an 8.5?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.6 months ago
Okay, real talk – $500 for racing shoes?! I’m all for performance but that’s like two pairs of Vaporflys. Anyone actually racing in these? How many hard efforts before they lose that magic? Trying to justify this to both my wallet and my partner lol.
6 months ago
$500 for racing flats? My wallet’s crying but man, they felt incredible when I checked them out at the Chicago Marathon expo. Like holding a feather! Not sure about that no-insole thing though – seems pretty wild for marathon distance.
6 months ago
That price tag is steep but the weight savings are incredible. Saw these at my running club – definitely more minimal than expected. Interesting to see how the durability holds up long-term.
9 months ago
I think the weight reduction is amazing, but could you compare how these perform against the Nike Vaporfly NEXT% 3 for marathon racing?
1 year ago
Can’t believe you got your hands on some. Where are all the reviews. They have seemed to slow down recently.
1 year ago
Video is coming out today or tomorrow! Don’t miss it!