EDITOR REVIEW
PRICE COMPARISON
COMMENTS (7)
 

“Fast can be more fun.” Is the driving force for Adidas new version of the Adizero F50 .2. Which in this runners opinion is pretty spot on accurate with this shoe. Adidas has done a super job in creating the ride and transition of a racing shoe and melting it with the durability and support of a daily trainer. Using Adiprene foam, a FORMOTION heel, and tucked beneath is the new SPRINTFRAME that borrows its technology from Adidas lightweight Prime sprint spike. Being one that comes from the thinking of jack of all trades master of none I usually think of an all in one shoe in the same capacity. However, the F50.2 definitely makes the grade as a solid all in one shoe like the DS trainer or the NB 890 handling up-tempo training, long runs, and even mild gravel surfaces.

Adidas Adizero F50 .2 First impressions:

The first thing that jumped out to me was how low the overall profile of the shoe is. The shoe is very sleek and conformed well to my foot. The upper of the shoe is very thin giving it a very light and airy feel. The Toe of the shoe upon first glance appeared as if it would be a bit narrow. However, after my first run in the shoe this was not the case as I will elaborate later on. The midsole was nice and light, and well cushioned. I also really appreciated how the midsole conformed and flowed nicely to the contours of my foot.

Adidas Adizero F50 .2 Upper:

As I just mentioned the upper of the F50 is very thin, airy, as well as flexible and conforming. This is in part to a few technologies than Adidas has incorporated into its upper. The main body is comprised of an air mesh that helps with ventilation, but is also very supple allowing it move and conform to the foot and its natural movements.

Hidden just below the air mesh is a COOlEVER mesh lining that is made from clover shaped yarn. This lining helped to reduce heat and wick away sweat keeping my feet comfortable and dry. A stitchless bonded SPRINT WEB capped the toe, and lacing system. This web provided just enough structure and support to the shoe without compromising its flexibility or weight. This helped keep the toebox very adaptable to my foot allowing my toes to move freely.

The tongue of the shoe is constructed of the same thin lightweight materials keeping it very minimal and helping it to stay in place. I did have a small issue with the front of the tongue folding in on the lateral side at the bottom just above my tarsals. This caused the material to ball up a little causing some minor discomfort. I remedied it by reaching in after the shoe was on and pressing it down with one finger then lacing the shoe up.

The Heel of the shoe is fairly narrow and flexible, and does not have the traditional plastic heel cup for structure. Instead the midsole extends up into the heel along with the SPRINTFRAME. The combination of the two helps provide a unique supportive heel. The upper is secured with a set of simple flat laces that remained tied on all of my runs.

Adidas Adizero F50 .2 Midsole:

Adidas begins with its CMEVA foam as the base of the midsole which provided nice durable responsive cushioning. A full forefoot layer of adiPRENE helped not only absorb shock but returned it providing nice forefoot propulsion. The heel cushioning is fairly substantial in the F50 this paired with a decoupled FORMOTION heel make the heel to toe transition very nice and effort less which I appreciated especially on more up-tempo runs.

The F50 strays slightly from the 12mm drop and incorporates an 11mm, which didn’t seem to feel much different than the typical 12.

A midsole support bridge or TORSION SYSTEM runs from the heel to the midfoot. This thermoplastic unit is designed to help decrease torsion through the foot strike for increased stability. I appreciated that Adidas didn’t overdo it and extend this too far into the forefoot. They did a nice job providing stability without sacrificing flexibility. I really think that this provides even enough stability for the efficient moderate overpronator to be able to run comfortably in.

Finally, the piece of resistance of the F50 that gives it that extra launch is the SPRINT FRAME. The frame is not to be confused as a stability device, but a spring loaded performance aid. The thermo plastic plate is hidden inside the shoe under the midsole and runs the length of the shoe. Its designed to push down as the foot flattens out from forefoot to heel, and as is begins to leave the ground the plate springs back. This gave an amazing pop to my toe off along with increasing my turnover speed all of which was smooth, quick, and effortless.

Adidas Adizero F50 .2 Outsole:

The outsole of the F50 is free of any cut outs which increased the surface area of the shoe, and not to mention helped avoid picking up large rocks. This made the shoe easy to take on less technical trails. Durable carbon rubber ADIWEAR in the forefoot and heel give the outsole nice durability that should go 400+ miles.

Adidas Adizero F50 .2 Opinion:

The ride of the F50 is amazingly smooth and responsive. This shoe coupled with its quick transition and snappy toe off made it easy to run fast. I found myself breaking into up-tempo runs when I had no intention of doing so.

I have put these shoes through a myriad of runs ranging from long 12-14 milers, ½-1mile intervals, and 7 mile pacers over varying terrain. No matter what I havethrown at these shoes they respond consistently smooth and effortlessly, especially as the pace increased.

This is a great high mileage shoe for neutral or slight overpronating runners. The F50 I think would also lend itself to the moderate overpronator that has been running for a while, and seeking to transition into a more neutral type shoe. I definitely think that this could be a great race shoe for those seeking more support than traditional racers, or the less efficient runner. After 150 miles the shoe has also proven its durability as it is showing very little signs of wear.

We thank the nice people at Adidas for sending us a pair of F50 to review. This did not influence our review of the shoes, written after logging more than 150 miles in them!

 

price comparison

Adidas Running - Adizero F50 2 M (prime Blue/zero Metallic/prime Blue) - Footwear

Zappos Free shipping both ways (free return shipping), 365 days returns
$100.00

Zappos Logo

Written by

Jim Coulson is a career firefighter, husband, and father of two children hailing from the foothills of Colorado. Jim has been an avid road and trail runner since the age of 12, and loves to race locally and around the state a much as possible. A native Coloradoan Jim enjoys its trails, mountains, and outdoors taking advantage of all they have to offer as much as possible.

 

7 Responses

  • Stevey14  says:

    Thanks for the reviews. Looking forward to receiving mine this weekend hopefully from adidas.com for 100 bucks.

    and even in the yellow! But you might like the blue better ;)

  • Theo says:

    Hi Guys,

    I have a question about these shoes. I currently have adidas boston 3′s for fast intervals and training races, adios 2′s for races. I do my easy and long training sessions on Asics Culumus 12′s. I’m looking to replace the asics. I’m looking come some good cushioning shoes that are quite stable. I’m a pretty natural runner with a mild pronation in my left foot.

    Since ive been liking the new adidas shoes a lot, i was looking at the F50 2′s. Are these stable enough or is something in the range of the Glide 4′s better in this respect?

    Thanks a lot!

    Theo

    • Jim Coulson says:

      Hello Theo,

      thanks for reading the review and the question. Looking at what you are currently wearing I think the F50 would be a good choice and transition well between the Adios and Boston 3. Both it and the Glide 4 are nice shoes and good for higher mileage. The one word of caution I will give you is that they are both going to be firmer than the cumulus you are currently wearing but you will definitely gain some more responsiveness. Hope this helps and good luck.

      JIM

  • BillyB  says:

    Gday mate

    I tried these on today and i had issues with the sizing –

    10 – was a tad small and my arch was leaning over the torsion bar

    10.5 Solved most of the issues BUT the front upper was now to sloppy. i did the shoes laces at the front tight but i could still easily overlap some of the upper.

    So this shoe isnt for me

    My question is though –

    Is the Other adizero shoes the same set up, in particular the boston 3 and Adios 2 ?

  • AV  says:

    Hi,

    I have a few questions:

    How similar are the Adidas F50.2 Runners to the original F50 runners? I am currently on my second pair of the original F50 runners and I absolutely love them! The original F50 is definitely the most comfortable running shoe that I have experienced. I just finished my first marathon in them last month.

    I have tried to find out if the two models are similar or not (intuitively, I think they would be similar), but I have not been able to find a review where it explicitly compares the two models.

    Please let me know if you have any idea regarding the similarities and differences between the F50 and F50.2 runners, and whether you think I would like the F50.2′s (given the fact that I love the F50′s).

    Thanks

  • George Lavoie says:

    Hey Jim. I currently run in Adidas Marathon 10′s,but am interested in the F50 2 shoe. How do you think they compare? Thanks. George

  • Adrien Frost says:

    Hi,

    After reading your review I am considering to buy one pair of these amazing shoes! My normal shoe size is 42 (EUR), I heard, that running shoes should be bigger, but I don’t know how much bigger actually. Could you please tell me what size (US) should I buy?

Leave a Reply

Name Required:

Email Required:

Website Optional

My Rating

Comment Required:

EDITOR REVIEW
PRICE COMPARISON
COMMENTS (7)