Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Medial Side Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Top Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Toe Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Sole Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Sole
Editor rating:
TAYLOR GUPTON
User's rating:

PROS

  • Responsive
  • Lightweight & Nimble
  • Simple, yet durable outsole
  • Wide toebox with very soft upper
  • Laces stop before metatarsal heads allowing for maximum toe splay and comfort

CONS

  • Narrow and stiff in midfoot area
  • Upper is too flexible resulting in a lack of control when changing directions
  • High price point

OUR VERDICT

The Reebok Floatride Run ULTK is relatively unchanged from the 2017 debut model. This shoe is a reliable daily trainer for the road that is ideal for faster-paced tempos and threshold runs.

The Floatride Run 2 is designed to handle training for everything from 5k up to the marathon.

The shoe provides a responsive ride and smooth heel-toe transition despite a stiff midfoot that takes some getting used to.
WHERE TO BUY
LOWEST PRICE
$149
$150   $149See It
$150   $149See It
SHOE INFO
Brand
Floatride Run ULTK
Model
8.60 oz. (244 gr.)
Weight
150 US$
MSRP
10 mm
Heel Drop
Jun / 2018
Release Date
Previous model

The Reebok Floatride Run ULTK is practically identical to last year’s debut model. I noticed only two apparent differences: 1) the colorway; and 2) the midfoot feels even more narrow than before.

The first thing I noticed in putting the Floatride Run ULTK on my feet was the tightness around the midfoot and the firmness of the arch — neither of these were so distinct in the original version of the shoe.

Certainly not the most comfortable introduction, but I didn’t feel any discomfort related to the narrow midfoot when running.

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Toe

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK – Toe

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK General Info

The Reebok Floatride Run ULTK is designed for long and quick runs on the road. Weighing in at 7oz for the women’s model and 8oz for men, this shoe will not weigh you down.

I tested the Floatride Run on the road and crushed-gravel natural surface trails. The shoe is designed for pavement and does not transition well to other surfaces, limiting your routes to the road or sidewalk.

The Floatride Run ULTK performed exceptionally well on faster tempos and threshold runs on straight, paved surfaces.

This shoe is nimble and quick off the ground, but the excessive flexibility of the upper does not provide much control when rounding a corner or changing directions.

The Floatride is moderately cushioned and somewhat stiff — not the ideal shoe for recovery days as it gives very little back when your legs are tired.

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Heel

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK – Heel

I appreciate the lightweight performance-driven design of the Floatride Run ULTK however, the price point is exceptionally high given some the nuanced features that actually end up limiting the performance capability of this shoe.

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK Sole Unit

The Floatride Run employs two different foams to deliver a stable and responsive ride without adding unnecessary weight. Reebok’s proprietary Floatride Foam (white) is sandwiched between the outsole and the top layer of standard EVA foam (black).

The layer of EVA foam beneath the insole of the shoe provides a firm platform for your foot. This stiffness is balanced by the soft, flexible Floatride Foam substrate under the EVA .

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Lateral Side

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK – Lateral Side

The result is a responsive, but not particularly soft ride. In fact, shoe’s stiffness around the arch and midfoot felt quite uncomfortable when I first put it on, but is not noticeable when running.

The most impressive characteristic of the midsole is how incredibly lightweight it is. The Floatride achieves a feather-like feel without sacrificing durability — a feat few running shoes have accomplished.

The high-abrasion rippled rubber outsole of the shoe overlays the midsole in a grid pattern that provides durability and a high level traction while keeping the weight of the shoe low.

Other shoe models, like the Kinvara, leave much more of the sole exposed in an effort to reduce the weight. Yet, they sacrifice longevity.

I give the Floatride outsole high marks for striking the perfect balance between durability and minimal weight.

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Sole

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK – Sole

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK Upper Info

The Floatride upper is where things get weird. Three components comprise the upper of this shoe: a sock-like knit forefoot unit, an external plastic frame for laces, and a 3D molded heel cup.

First, let’s discuss the details of the knit forefoot upper. Reebok is not the first company to introduce a sock-like upper. In fact, they’re kind of late to the game. (Nike has been doing this for years with the Flyknit).

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Top

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK – Top

But, the Floatride does offer a distinctly different approach by only utilizing the knit fabric over the forefoot of the shoe. The one-piece ultraknit fabric is designed to provide maximum, breathable flexibility.

It accomplishes this design goal too well. The knit upper has so much give, that nearly all control is lost when turning corner or quickly changing directions on a run.

When turning, the sole unit provides ample traction in gripping the road, but the overly-flexible knit upper didn’t hold my foot securely to the shoe.

The result was that my foot would slide across the midsole of the shoe, stretching the upper, while the sole stayed firmly in place on the ground.

This loss of control was amplified with speed. Running in a relatively straight line was fine, but changing direction required slowing down.

At midfoot, the knit fabric over the forefoot clumsily transitions into a 3D molded heel cup.

The sock-like knit piece overlaps with the heel cup in the middle of the shoe resulting in a very narrow midfoot channel with a higher arch than most neutral shoes. This shoe is a no-go for wide feet.

I have relatively narrow feet, and even I experienced some discomfort at midfoot where the knitted upper transitions to the heel cradle. The heel cup is much stiffer than the forefoot upper, but still has plenty of give to it.

The material covering the heel counter is smooth and does not rub. However, the wide shape of the heel cup does not hug the achilles enough to prevent slippage.

One of the best methods for addressing heel slip in a shoe is to change the lacing to what is often called the runner’s lace or heel lock.

Unfortunately, there are no additional lacing holes on the Floatride Run to provide recourse for addressing heel slip. Given the idiosyncrasies of the upper, extra holes for lacing would be beneficial for customizing the fit of the shoe.

But that is not the case with the Floatride Run ULTK, which only employs six holes for the laces. The lacing mechanism is quite unique. A lightweight plastic exoskeleton frame provides the structure for the laces.

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK - Medial Side

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK – Medial Side

This feature may add a style factor to the shoe, but it also acts as a cage around the midfoot that limits natural movement.

Despite these downfalls of the Floatride lacing system, I really appreciate that the laces stop just before the toes.

This is all the lacing needed to hold a shoe on your foot, and I wish more companies stopped lacing all way over the metatarsal heads. I commend Reebok for not being afraid to lace less.

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK Conclusions

The Floatride Run ULTK is one of several shoes in Reebok’s lineup that is attempting to redefine the brand as a legitimate contender in performance running shoes.

The Floatride Run is a good attempt at this, but could use several improvements to really achieve top notch status.

Although I prefer a shoe with greater versatility, I have come to enjoy running fast in the Floatrides on flat, paved surfaces.

If you’re interested in a second opinion on the Reebok Floatride Run, consider reading last year’s RSG review of the debut model.

The Floatride Run ULTK carries over 99.9% of the same features from the original, so this review is worth a read if you’re considering purchasing this shoe.

We purchased a pair of Reebok Floatride Run ULTK from runningwarehouse using our own money. This did not influence the outcome of this review, written after running more than 50 miles in them.

Reebok Floatride Run ULTK Price Comparison




This web site uses cookies. Click Accept to continue. Review Our Cookie Policy

On these and other websites owned by RSG Media BV we use cookies and other similar techniques.

We place and use different types of cookies for the following purposes:

Functional cookies:
To make our websites work as intended.

Analytical cookies:
To collect and analyze statistics to improve the experience on our websites and the effectiveness of advertisements.

Tracking cookies:
To build personal profiles of you so that we can show you targeted content and advertisements that match your interests.

Social cookies:
To allow you to share your reaction through 'likes' or commentary.

In addition, third parties (which are partly outside the EU) can place cookies on our websites, including tracking cookies that can also be used to build up a profile of you. Tracking cookies may have an impact on your privacy.

By giving your consent below, you agree that we place and read cookies on all our websites (see this overview) and combine these collected data.

Your consent remains valid for 6 months unless you withdraw it.

Close