Written by

Brandon Law

Marathon Runner and Shoe Expert
The Asics GT 1000 is an entry-level stability shoe with a budget price; the Asics GT 2000 is a mid-range stability shoe with moderate support and a moderate price. Here we will be comparing the two shoes.
Asics GT 1000 vs Asics GT 2000

The Asics GT 1000 is the base model in Asics' stability category and shares some features with the GT 2000 but retails for $40 less.

The Asics GT 2000 is a staple in the light-stability category and one of the most popular shoes in the medially-posted running shoe market. Which of these shoes is the right choice for you?

Similarity and differences: GT 1000 13 vs GT 2000 12

Brand
Shoe type
Expert score
Expert score
6/10
Expert score
9/10
Weight
9.7 oz
9.5 oz
Heel Drop
8 mm
8 mm
Verdict
The ASICS GT 1000 13 is a budget-conscious stability trainer. While this edition has undergone some updates that improve the GT 1000, its drawbacks overshadow these enhancements, making it an average option.
The ASICS GT 2000 12 is a stability trainer that is both durable and versatile trainer built for comfort. Its small but noticeable changes have turned a good trainer into a great one.
Recommended for
Daily training
Daily training
Cushioning type
Responsive/balanced
Balanced
Cushioning amount
Medium cushioning
Medium cushioning
Flexibility
medium
medium
Stability
some stability
some stability
Sizing
true to size
true to size
Retail price
US$109.95
US$139.95

Sole unit: GT 1000 13 vs GT 2000 12

The GT 1000 has a FlyteFoam midsole which is durable and light. The GT 2000 has a FlyteFoam & FF Blast midsole which is slightly softer than FlyteFoam in the GT 1000. The GT 2000 has a more forgiving midsole which is better suited to longer runs above 10km.

Both shoes have the medial support system which is a wedge that reduces over pronation by controlling the movement of the foot. The also both have Guidance Trusstic Systems that provide midfoot rigidity. These features make the GT 1000 and GT 2000 very stable.

The GT 1000 only has a rear foot gel unit to provide shock absorption whereas the GT 2000 has rear foot and forefoot gel units.

Both trainers have 10mm offsets so they are both suitable for heel strikers as there is plenty of foam in the heel to soften heel strikes.

There is plenty of rubber on the soles of both shoes. The GT 1000 has AHAR (Asics High Abrasion Rubber) in the forefoot and softer blown rubber in the forefoot. The GT 2000 has AHAR+ in the rear foot which is firmer and more durable, and has AHAR in the forefoot instead of regular blown rubber in the GT 1000. The outsole of the GT 2000 should last longer than the GT 1000.

Upper unit: GT 1000 13 vs GT 2000 12

The GT 1000 has an engineered mesh which is flexible, breathable and light. The fit is tight at first but the upper stretches and loosens up after a couple runs in them. The upper is seamless, comfortable and dries quickly. The GT 1000 runs true to size and comes in regular, wide (2E) and extra wide (4E) versions.

The GT 2000 is made from a light and breathable engineered mesh that looks and feels more “expensive” than the GT 1000 upper. It has a narrow fit so you need to go up a half size or get the wide version if you don’t have very narrow feet. The GT 2000 doesn’t have an external heel clutch but it does exceptionally well at holding the heel in place. The GT 2000 also comes in regular, wide (2E) and extra wide (4E) versions.

Which one to buy: GT 1000 13 vs GT 2000 12

If you’re a runner looking for a great value-for-money stability shoe with a responsive ride, the GT 1000 is the shoe for you. The GT 1000 has a similar ride to its more expensive siblings (GT 2000 and Kayano) and shares many of the same features such as a rearfoot gel unit, DuoMax Support System and Trusstic System. The GT 1000 has a comfortable upper and a durable outsole.

If you’re a runner looking for a stability shoe for longer runs, the GT 2000 is for you. The GT 2000 has an extra forefoot get unit for shock absorption and has an AHAR forefoot outsole for increased durability. The extra features in the GT 2000 adds extra weight and it is also $40 more expensive.

Best price online: GT 1000 13 vs GT 2000 12


This expert review is written by

Brandon Law

Marathon Runner and Shoe Expert
Brandon is a South African who lives and trains in Malaysia. He is a marathon runner who eats, sleeps and dreams running shoes. While most people wear shoes to run, he runs to wear shoes.