Editor rating:
7/10 on
User's rating:


  • Sleek look
  • Supportive, breathable upper
  • Durable cushion
  • Stable base resists torsion
  • Price


  • Lower arch than previous
  • Less plush, same weight


The ASICS GT-1000 7 combines a supportive upper with a stable base to deliver a comfortable ride that feels fast. The slimmed-up feel and lower drop will better appeal to neutral runners, yet the structure of the shoe offers the stability users have come to expect.
merchant logo$90 $67See It
GT 1000 7
oz. (0 gr.)
89.95 US$
9 mm
Heel Drop
Jul / 2018
Release Date
Previous model
The new design has a low arch and will appeal to neutral runners to mild overpronators looking for a quality everyday trainer at a low price.

Right out of the box, the sleek new look of GT-1000 7 caught my eye. Breathability of the upper remains the same as that of GT-1000 6, but it is slimmed down and lacks the (mid-grade) padded comfort of its predecessor, offering slightly more upward room in the forefoot.

It’s not as cushioned of a feel, to me an acceptable change if it comes with a decrease in weight. But the 7 is the same weight as the 6. There is also a markedly lower arch in the shoe, and the offset has decreased from 10 to 8mm.

Asics GT 1000 7 General Info

The GT-1000 model is ASICS’ cheaper version in their stability lineup, with Kayano at the top end in materials, cushion, and innovation, and GT-2000, GT-3000, and Gel-Fortitude designed to meet different runner needs.

Immediately noticeable to those familiar with ASICS stability technology is the different look of this shoe’s midfoot structure and a change in heel materials.

The take-away is that the stability function is (surprisingly) unchanged midfoot, with a more firm landing pad in the heel; see the Sole section for details.

Asics GT 1000 7 - Pair

Asics GT 1000 7 – Pair

The drop from heel to toe changed from 10mm to 8mm, giving it a more neutral feel, and the width of the shoe’s base remains the same as the GT-1000 6, which was reduced from the 5.

The 1000’s forefoot is a few millimeters wider than that of GT-2000’s resigned shoe in its sixth edition.

The 1000 fits a slightly wider foot than the 2000 or 3000, with stability coming in the form of a wider base, especially in the toe-off region.

GT-2000 offers support by way of a medium-high arch and a similarly stiff midfoot. GT-3000 boasts the same, with a design suited for narrow feet with bunions.

Ravenna 9 is a competitor that brings a similar low arch, with a more narrow fit and 2mm higher drop. Ravenna has an overall snappier feel, but GT-1000 7 fits a medium-width foot more comfortably.

Those who don’t want to increase length just for the accompanied greater width in a shoe will prefer this ASICS model.

Asics GT 1000 7 Sole Unit

Asics GT 1000 7 - Sole

Asics GT 1000 7 – Sole

Gone are the plastic bars and shank under the arch; in their place is a thermal plastic midfoot unit with a FLYTEFOAM® heel wedge extending into the lateral midfoot and ASICS High Abrasion Rubber (AHAR®) extending up under the arch to fill in the void for torsion control.

The midfoot maintains the unbending support of previous versions.

Rearfoot GEL® remains directly under the heel of the shoe (none visible) with a FLYTEFOAM® piece on the lateral heel providing a firm base.

This is the first GT shoe from ASICS to sport (a piece of) their premium midsole material, and I find that it propels a heel strike forward better than the SpEVA®/GEL® combo in the heel of previous versions.

The durable cushion of SpEVA® makes up the rest of the midsole.

ASICS high abrasion rubber AHAR® covers the ground contact surfaces of the sole with the familiar Guidance Line® running through, with a sectioned forefoot providing traction and flexibility.

Asics GT 1000 7 Upper Info

ASICS updated the 1000’s upper, now supporting the foot with a seamless engineered mesh that is thinner in the mid and forefoot areas and presents a fast, modern look.

The shoe maintains a solid heel counter to limit ankle motion, and reflective patches on the back enhance visibility in low light.

The EVA sockliner is thinner than in the 6 but still comfortable.

Asics GT 1000 7 Conclusions

This 7th shoe in the 1000 line from ASICS continues to be a quality shoe at a discount price, but next to the previous version, I’m disappointed by the decrease in arch support and comfort, especially since the shoe is the same weight.

That said, it’s still a quality shoe that brings durable support. You’ll like it if the low arch suits your fancy and the increased toe room makes you smile.

Now more streamlined, this shoe has a more neutral feel but still boasts the supportive midfoot, countered heel, and med-wide forefoot that devotees expect. I’d say that the more firm cushion of the FLYTEFOAM® landing pad is the best update to the shoe.

What do you think of the massive overhaul to GT-1000? Is it thumbs up or thumbs down for you, or, like me, a bit of both?

We purchased a pair of Asics GT 1000 7 from runningwarehouse using our own money. This did not influence the outcome of this review, written after running more than 50 miles in them.

Asics GT 1000 7 Price Comparison

This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Similar shoes to Asics GT 1000 7

Expert score

Asics Magic Speed Review

The ASICS MAGIC SPEED™ delivers on its promise of comfortable, lightweight ... (Read expert review)
Expert score

Asics Gel DS Trainer 26 Review

The ASICS Gel-DS Trainer 26 combines its unchanged, fabulous grip with a snug, ... (Read expert review)
Expert score

Asics Gel Kayano 28 Review

The ASICS Kayano 28 is a top-tier stability trainer built for all paces and ... (Read expert review)
Expert score

Asics Novablast 2 Review

The ASICS Novablast 2 is a unique daily trainer in the ASICS lineup which is ... (Read expert review)
Expert score

Asics GT 1000 10 Review

The ASICS GT 1000 10 is an economically minded stability trainer that ... (Read expert review)
Expert score

Mizuno Wave Inspire 17 Review

The Mizuno Wave Inspire 17 are built for stability and miles. Unfortunately, ... (Read expert review)