Average-to-heavy-weight runners will appreciate Glycerin 21 GTS for a long run shoe that can double as a speed shoe, especially those who need extra stability and find “speed shoes” too flimsy.
Skip Glycerin and Glycerin GTS if you like a connected “ground feel” while running. Those with narrow feet who want a high-quality running shoe may appreciate the Saucony Omni 13, which also offers a more supportive sock liner.
The Glycerin GTS 21 follows the Glycerin GTS 20 and continues to offer a stable ride with a very smooth transition. Glycerin GTS is the stability version of Brooks’ Glycerin, which means it is the same shoe but with the added feature of GuideRails® to help guide the foot through regular pronation.
Glycerin GTS is the most plush stability offering from Brooks, joining the Launch GTS with its speed focus and Adrenaline GTS which sits between the two in cushion.
This shoe retails at $160 USD, the same as last year and as the Transcend 4, 5, 6 and 7, the previous name for Brooks’ most plush stability shoe (the cost was $10 lower for the first year when the name and design switched to “Glycerin GTS 19”).
The listed weight remains at 10.5 oz. (297.7 g.) in a US M9 and drops slightly to 9.2 oz. (260.8 g.) in a US W7; the StealthFit version with a compression knit upper is about a half ounce lighter.
Brooks allows runners to choose their preferences with choices for “StealthFit” or “Classic” for the upper and “Neutral” (Glycerin) or “Support” (Glycering GTS) for the midsole, regular or wide width.
Glycerin GTS competes with Saucony Omni, New Balance Vongo, and ASICS Gel-Kayano for top-end stability offerings.
Overall, I recommend Glycerin 21 GTS over the Saucony Omni 22 with two exceptions:
1) I take the sock liner out of Omni to put in Glycerin; it’s thicker and offers more arch support;
2) You’ll probably prefer Omni if you have a narrow foot. I stayed with the half-size smaller in Omni than Glycerin because though I’d prefer a slightly wider toe, the length was true to size. Sizing up would have made it really long.
Choose Vongo if you want the extra stiffness and spring of a nylon-plated shoe and Glycerin GTS if your foot gets uncomfortable wearing a plated shoe.
Unboxing Glycerin GTS 21, I loved the slick, clean style and looked forward to stepping onto this plush, attractive model.
It did not disappoint in feel underfoot, but I knew right away that I would need to size up a half size. True to the .2 oz drop in the listed weights (for women), the 21 in my size 10 weighed the same as last year’s size 9.5.
The first run felt smooth, and this continued through my testing period (70 miles).
A higher, more solid heel counter this model is a nice surprise; padding around the ankle is moderate. My heel did not slip, and my foot felt supported.
The shoe has better breathability and a more comfortable fit that does not require as long of a break in as in the 20.
The StealthFit upper option, available in both Glycerin and Glycerin GTS, allows for even more stretch, like Nike’s Flyknit in their React Infinity Run FK 2.
My least favorite part of the shoe is the sock liner. It is average, but for a $160 shoe I would hope for something more robust and supportive under the arch, like I found in the ($30 less expensive) Omni 13. After about 40 miles of testing the Glycerin GTS sock liner felt flat. I like to put the Omni liner into the Glycerin GTS for a better feel underfoot inside the shoe.
The look is attractive and inviting, with a less-busy pattern than the 20 and a variety of colorways to choose from.
This nitrogen approach brings a unique feel: soft yet resilient — not plush, but comfortable. The ride is light and airy, with a rocker feel underfoot and quick transition into toe-off. The drop is 10 mm.
The GuideRails® remain largely unchanged since their 2019 revamp in Transcend 6. This unique approach to counter excess motion and alleviate pressure on knees and hips works together with the upper’s heel counter to rein in movement.
The GuideRails® consist of the midsole extending up to border the shoe to provide support if needed. If not, they are not noticeable. The GuideRails® also help support the arch of the shoe to direct foot motion forward rather than rotating too far inward.
Again this year the thin, carbon-rubber outsole will be the first part of the shoe to evidence wear. An additional flex groove just before toe-off exposes the midsole, and after 70 miles on my shoes I can already see it starting to fray.
On the positive side, the outsole covers more of the lateral midfoot.
This is a remarkable shoe that is fun to run in. The main thing keeping me from giving it five stars is the “meh” sock liner.
Sock liner aside, try Glycerin GTS 21 for the best in cushion, stability, and upper support.
Before buying, first check to see if you have heavy wear patterns under the medial toe box on your previous shoes.
The new flex groove under Glycerin GTS’s big toe exposes the midsole, and it might be a warning for you to try a different model to avoid premature wear.
2 weeks ago
Been running in the Ghost 14s for a while and my PT suggested more stability. Anyone switch from Ghost to Glycerin GTS? My wallet’s crying at the price difference – need to know if it’s worth it for my mild overpronation!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 weeks ago
The Glycerin GTS 21 has been my go-to trainer for the past 4 months, covering about 400 miles. The GuideRails stability system works brilliantly for my slight overpronation without feeling intrusive. I particularly love the smooth heel-to-toe transition during easy runs and long runs up to 18 miles. The DNA LOFT v3 cushioning hits a sweet spot – protective enough for high mileage but not mushy. Recently used these for a 3:45 marathon and my legs felt relatively fresh afterward. Compared to the Hoka Arahi 6 I used previously, these offer better durability and a more natural ride. The sock liner is indeed basic for a $160 shoe, and I’ve noticed some premature wear under the big toe. Despite these minor issues, the overall package delivers exceptional comfort and stability for daily training.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Made the jump from Ghost 14 to these last month. Love how the support isn’t in-your-face like some stability shoes, but man, what’s up with that cheap sock liner? For what Brooks charges, you’d expect better quality. Still on the fence about whether these are worth the extra cash over the Ghost GTS – might go back when these wear out.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 weeks ago
Training for Chicago Marathon and thinking about switching from my Ghost 14 GTS to these. Need something with more cushion for those 20-milers. Can anyone who’s run in both compare the stability? Also worried about the outsole – heard they skimped on rubber coverage this time. Don’t want them wearing out halfway through training!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Training for my first full and need something stable for those long runs. My PT recommended these but I’m used to shoes with medial posts. Anyone switched from traditional stability shoes to the GuideRails? Really don’t want any knee issues to flare up during training.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
The Glycerin GTS 21 has been my go-to trainer for the past 3 months, with over 250 miles logged. The DNA LOFT v3 cushioning provides excellent impact protection while maintaining good ground feel. GuideRails support system works seamlessly – I notice less knee fatigue compared to traditional posting designs. The upper fit is absolutely perfect – secure without any pressure points. While I agree the sock liner could be better, the overall package delivers for long runs and recovery days alike. Have used these for everything from easy 5-milers to 20-mile long runs. Compared to previous stability shoes like the Hurricane and Kayano, these feel more natural and less corrective. Despite the premium price, the durability and performance justify the cost.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Hey everyone! My trusty Glycerin 19s are finally wearing out and I’m eyeing the new GTS 21. Anyone made the same switch? I tend to overpronate a bit and wondering if the support feels similar. Also – my old ones fit pretty snug, debating if I should size up this time. Training for a spring marathon and trying to decide between these and the Ghost, especially given the price difference!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Just tried these on at Fleet Feet – man, that cushioning feels dreamy but my wallet’s crying at that $160 price tag! My old Adrenalines are still going strong and I can usually grab those on sale. Love the roomier toe box though… might have to watch for these to go on clearance!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Training for my first marathon and trying to decide between these and the Adrenalines I’ve been using. Anyone made the switch between these two? My feet tend to swell on longer runs, so wondering if I should size up – normally wear a 9 in Brooks but heard these might run small?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.2 months ago
Great comfy stable ride with lots of room in the toe box . For a 70 year old runner with bunions these are my GTS.
2 months ago
My physio suggested getting a stability shoe for my mild overpronation – anyone made the switch from regular Glycerin to these? Also got bunions so really need that roomy toe box. Worth trying or should I look at something else?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Training for my first marathon in October and trying to decide on shoes. Can anyone who’s done their long runs in these share their experience? My local store has both these and the Ghost 15, but the price difference is making me hesitate. Also worried about the toe box since I tend to get black toenails on longer runs.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
The Glycerin GTS 21 has been my daily trainer for the past 3 months, logging around 300 miles. The stability features are perfectly implemented – supportive without feeling intrusive like traditional posting. I’ve used these for multiple 20+ mile training runs preparing for Boston, and the cushioning remains consistent. The smooth transition really shines during marathon pace work. While I agree the sock liner could be better at this price point, the overall package is fantastic. The upper provides great lockdown without any hotspots. Compared to the Saucony Triumph 21, these offer better stability while maintaining similar cushioning levels. Despite some minor gripes about the outsole coverage, these have become my go-to long run shoes.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.3 months ago
Finally got to try these on yesterday – what a difference in the toe box compared to my beat-up Ghost 15s! My toes can actually wiggle now lol. Cushioning feels perfect for my daily 5-milers, though that sock liner does feel kinda cheap. Found them on sale for $140 which seems way more reasonable than full price. Might pull the trigger!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.4 months ago
After 300 miles in the Glycerin GTS 21, I can say these are incredibly reliable stability trainers. The GuideRails system works seamlessly with my mild overpronation, especially on tired legs during marathon training. Used these for my fall marathon build-up, including multiple 20-milers. The cushioning strikes a perfect balance – protective without feeling mushy. Compared to the Adrenaline GTS, these feel more premium and cushioned. The smooth transition makes long runs feel easier. While expensive at $160, the durability has been excellent. Only downside is the basic sock liner and reduced toe rubber.
4 months ago
Excellent! Thank you for sharing this.
4 months ago
Overpronator here looking to switch from my worn-out Adrenalines. How’s the support compare? Also, any wide-footed runners try these? My bunions need some space and Brooks sizing can be hit or miss.
5 months ago
Fellow forefoot strikers – what’s the deal with the reduced toe rubber? My last pair of Brooks wore through pretty quick up front. Trying to decide between these and the Ghost 15 GTS for my next marathon build. Anyone run in both?
7 months ago
I’m curious to know how this compares to the Glycerin 20 in terms of the cushioning. Is there a noticeable difference for a midfoot striker?
7 months ago
I tried these for a few months and have mixed feelings. Cushioning is really solid, but I wish they were a bit lighter. Also, my feet got quite warm during longer runs. Durability seems strong though, and I like the stability for my overpronation issues. Overall, I’d say they’re a good pick but not perfect for me.
8 months ago
The added guide rails make such a difference in stability! I’ve had issues with other shoes lacking support on longer runs, but these were solid. Plus, the cushioning is just the right balance — soft but not too squishy.
8 months ago
The cushioning on the Glycerin GTS 21 is absolutely amazing. It’s super plush yet responsive, which is rare to find together. My long runs always feel smooth, and the built-in stability features work well without over-correcting my stride. Also, love the sleek design this time around! Only downside, after a few hundred miles, the upper started feeling a bit loose for me. Overall, I’m very happy though.