Asics Novablast 3 review

8 expert score
7.3 user's score
As editorial policy, we do not accept free samples. We purchased this pair at Running Warehouse with our own money.
Review written on 28th March by Brandon Law Marathon Runner and Shoe Expert
157 other reviews

Asics Novablast 3 Verdict

The ASICS Novablast 3 is a polished daily trainer which is best suited to relaxed, easy runs. Its midsole has been upgraded to FF Blast+ foam so it loses a bunch of weight and gains some extra cushioning depth. Version 3 rides smoother than its predecessor but it rides firmer so it doesn't have the fun, bouncy ride which the Novablast used to be known for.

The pros

  • Smoother ride transitions
  • Better breathability
  • Improved stability
  • More cushioning

The cons

  • Less bouncy than predecessors
  • Thin tongue slides down
  • Fit runs long

Where to buy

Best offers today in United States, all prices in USD

Rating breakdown

Comfort
9.0
Build quality
9.0
Upper
7.0
Sole unit
7.0
Landing
8.0
Transition
8.0
Toe-off
8.0
Traction
7.0
Durability
9.0
Value / Price
8.0

Facts / Specs

Brand
Model
Novablast 3
Previous model
Weight
8.9 oz (252 g)
MSRP
$140.00

Heel
mm.
Toe
mm.
Heel drop
9 mm.
Carbon plate
No plate

Size/Fit

Sizing
Buy half size smaller
Heel fit
Normal
Midfoot fit
Normal
Toebox fit
Normal

Cushioning & ride

Type of cushioning
Balanced
Amount of cushioning
Highly cushioned
Stability
Very stable
Flexibility
Flexible

Usage

Racing
Speedwork
Daily training  
Long distance racing
Ultra distance racing

Who should buy the Asics Novablast 3 ?

If you’re looking for a daily trainer with a smooth ride that can be used for easy runs and long runs, the Novablast 3 is a great option. It has no major weaknesses and it has a very comfortable ride.

Who should not buy the Asics Novablast 3 ?

The Novablast 3 is a pretty versatile shoe that can be worn by many different runners. What it does not excel at is increasing speed – so fast runners or runners looking for a race shoe might be better looking somewhere else.

Asics Novablast 3 Introduction

For me, the Novablast series has been one of the most exciting non-plated series over the past 2 years. What made it so exciting was its super fun, bouncy ride. ASICS managed to achieve this with the Novablast’s unique midsole geometry.

The Novablast 1 and 2 had a deep decoupled groove underneath them which started at the rearfoot and extended all the way into the forefoot. The sides of the midsole also had a scoop shape with deep triangular indentations which allowed a high level of compression when the shoe was loaded.

This created the “trampoline effect” which felt as if the shoes were propelling you upwards and forwards. The “trampoline effect” gave it the ability to pick up the pace for faster runs while its thick, cushioned midsole made it also great for easy and long runs. Versatility was a big strength of the Novablast.

My favourite thing about the Novablast is that it offers younger runners something different if the Nimbus/Kayano/Cumulus don’t appeal to them. Its ride is more modern, more exciting.

The Novablast was one of my highest-rated trainers last year and a staple in my rotation.

Every year, the Novablast gets a full house of changes. This year’s version has a brand new upper, midsole and outsole. Version 2 weighed 9.7 oz (275 g) and version 3 now weighs 8.9 oz (252 g) which is a significant weight loss. The midsole of version 3 has 1 more millimetre of foam in the heel and in the forefoot, making it even more cushioned. The price has gone up by $10.

Asics Novablast 3 First Impressions

The first time I walked around in it, it felt surprisingly firmer than the first two versions. I was expecting the FF Blast+ midsole to be extremely squishy like the midsole of the Nimbus 24 but this foam felt denser.

My first run was a 30 kilometre long weekend run. The Novablast 3 felt fantastic right out of the box and it didn’t need to be broken in. The ride felt firmer than previous versions but it wasn’t uncomfortably firm.

The midsole felt very well-cushioned and I felt like I could have run further if it wasn’t for the late morning heat. You could easily run a full marathon in the Novablast 3. The upper felt extremely comfortable although I experienced downward tongue slide.

I noticed that the ride felt muted and not as springy as previous versions.

The FF Blast+ foam was disappointing and didn’t deliver much energy return. There were periods during the long run where I could pick up the pace but overall, it felt slower and more relaxed than previous Novablasts.

Asics Novablast 3 Upper

The Novablast 3’s upper is stripped down compared to previous versions. The tongue is now flat with no padding and the jacquard mesh is thinner so it’s overall a more breathable shoe.

ASICS still hasn’t fixed the length problem. It runs too long so if you go true to size, it feels like you’re wearing clown shoes. I found that if I wear really thick socks, the fit is fine but then my feet get really warm. If you have low volume feet, you can definitely go down a half size.

The flat, asymmetrical tongue is gusseted but it slides down so I prefer the thicker tongue of v1 and v2. It has wide wings so it doesn’t slide sideways at least but for easy day shoes I prefer the comfort that comes with a thicker tongue.

There’s no heel slippage and you don’t need to use a runner’s knot but I did do so because I found that the laces are too long. The collar padding is plush so there’s plenty of comfort in the rear.

Asics Novablast 3 Sole Unit

We’ve already seen 2 trainers this year that were modified to be more mainstream- to appeal to a wider group of runners. The NB Rebel v3 and the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 have both become stabler, and more cushioned but have lost some of the fun factor which made them so popular to begin with.

We also see this trend with this year’s Novablast 3. ASICS has done a few things to the midsole geometry to achieve this: the first is that the base is now wider because the midsole flares out. This makes the ride much stabler; stability was previously a big weakness of the Novablast.

The midsole sidewall design has also changed which results in less midsole compression and less lean bias. There are no longer deep cutouts in the sidewalls which encourage compression. This change results in less “trampoline effect”. Running in the Novablast 3 feels noticeably flatter and I miss having that fun bounce which was present in the first 2 Novablasts.

The decoupled groove is shallower compared to the previous versions. This makes the shoe ride firmer because there’s less space for the shoe to compress at the bottom. It also makes ride transitions smoother because the outsole is a flatter configuration.

The FF Blast+ foam in the Novablast 3 feels like a completely different foam to the FF Blast+ in the Nimbus 24: it’s noticeably less squishy and doesn’t compress as easily. This FF Blast+ reminds me of Flytefoam, ASICS’ ancient midsole foam. I would definitely enjoy the Novablast 3 more if it was the same softness as the Nimbus 24.

I’m marathon training at the moment and I did mostly easy runs in it. It’s great for soaking up miles when speed isn’t important, however the one long run I did in it I was able to do the same pace as I did in the Endorphin Speed 3 and that shoe has a plate in it.

The Novablast 3 has a gentle rocker and really deep cushioning which is ideal for long runs. The FF Blast+ midsole does a really good job at absorbing impact and keeping your legs fresh.

When it comes to speed, I can do very short bursts below 4 minutes per kilometre in it but it’s definitely not a shoe that I would do long intervals or long tempo runs in- its forefoot is too flexible so it feels a tad sluggish.

The Novablast 3’s outsole is very similar to version 2 but the rubber is a flatter profile so it makes transitions smoother. Grip is a bit dodgy on wet surfaces though because of the flat rubber. The outsole rubber on the rearfoot doesn’t extend over the edges like it did on the Novablast 2 so the edges get slightly scuffed.

There’s thick rubber coverage on all the high wear areas so the Novablast 3 has decent outsole durability. On my pair, there is average wear after 80 km’s so durability is acceptable for a daily trainer.

Asics Novablast 3 Conclusions

The Novablast used to have the “wow” factor but this year’s Novablast 3 didn’t sweep me off my feet. It feels like a very ordinary trainer. I miss the bouncy trampoline feeling that I got in the first version and to a certain extent in the second version.

The Novablast series was all about being fun but the Novablast 3 is more business-like: more structure and tamer. If I can find a Novablast 1 in the shops, I’ll snap it up because it has such a unique ride. The Novablast 3 now feels very similar to other daily trainers.

Stability is one area where the Novablast 3 has improved so if you found previous versions too unstable, you’ll get along much better with this version. The weight has decreased substantially thanks to the new midsole foam and ride transitions are now smoother due to the shallower decoupled groove underneath the shoe.

For me, the Novablast 3 is less versatile than versions 1 and 2 because I find it less lively, not as energetic. I’ll still use it in my rotation for only easy/recovery days but there are other daily trainers which can pick up the pace more easily such as the On Cloudmonster and the Hoka Mach 5.

The Novablast 3 is a very good long run shoe and just eats up miles. I enjoy it much more than other “traditional” daily trainers like the Pegasus 39, Ghost 14 and Wave Rider 25 because of its higher level of cushioning and its lighter weight.

Why you can trust us

As editorial policy, we do not accept free samples from companies.
We purchased this pair of Asics at Running Warehouse  with our own money.

This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Read more about our policy.
Lowest price:

$89

Asics Novablast 3 price comparison

Best offers today in United States, all prices in USD

Reviewed by Brandon

This review was written by Brandon Law on 28th March.
Brandon is a South African who lives and trains in Malaysia. He is a marathon runner who eats, sleeps and dreams running shoes. While most people wear shoes to run, he runs to wear shoes.

User feedback (13)

  • avatar-comment-1035164
    Dietmar Kaske
    3 months ago

    Novablast 3 seems to be totally overrated while another Asics is totally underrated. Been running in Glideride 3 for months and just love them. For rotation I just purchased a pair of Novablast 3 after all the good reviews and was shocked when used the first time! The run is way to firm for my weight and my feet hurt after 5km. There was no bounce at all. Quite noisy on asphalt as well (I am midfoot/forefoot striker). Overall a boring experience, no comfort and no pace, will send them back and just ordered a second pair (replacement) of Glideride 3 which give me plenty of comfort (no pain at all after 10km) and can also give me pace if needed. Well, learning (lesson) by running (shoes)

  • avatar-comment-1031180
    Illy
    8 months ago
    6 score

    I wear size 40 EU, male, 70 kg, and I’m a heel striker. I ordered and tested the Novablast 3 shoes. I was looking for a pair of running shoes that would be gentle on my knees and spine, and after a long time spent on research and reviews, I decided to try the NV3. They seemed ideal, very comfortable when I tried them on. However, on the running track, I felt the soles of my feet heating up, my left heel sinking deeper into the foam sole, there is a poor grip, they slap the tread belt really hard and they are slippery on wet asphalt. Unfortunately, they were also quite uncomfortable during regular walking. On a positive note, they are lightweight, offer a sleek appearance, and the cushioning felt fantastic and plush during speeding up intervals. In terms of sizing, I would recommend going half a size down.
    While they didn’t work for me, they might still be a good fit for others with a different walking or running style.

  • avatar-comment-1030982
    Jose
    9 months ago
    6 score

    Nice upper, cool colorway but not much energy return. Coming from an old pair of Nike Pegasus Turbo 2 that were light, springy abs and fun, these feel muted and flat. They are super dangerous in the wet as well. And I’ve worn a hole in the inside heel padding on one shoe at less than 200 km.

  • avatar-comment-1030207
    Tom C
    9 months ago
    10 score

    This is the best maximal shoe I’ve tried. Needs a run to break in the fit. LE version has a flared heel but less secure fit. Original Novablast 3 is my favorite shoe of all time possibly.

  • avatar-comment-1028452
    Kris Kolodziej
    11 months ago
    5 score

    Boring Basic Shoe. Soft upper but that’s it. Slaps the tread belt harder than any shoe if worn. No squish. No bounce. No anything. I was very surprised after many good reviews for this show to be so basic and boring.

    • avatar-comment-1035163
      Dietmar Kaske
      3 months ago

      fully agree!

  • avatar-comment-1022824
    Carlo
    1 year ago

    Would you suggest the Novablast 3 for tempo runs @ 4:30/km? Asking because the Mach 5 is 4mm drop while I am in search of an 8mm.

    • avatar-comment-1036492
      Pierre-Louis
      2 weeks ago
      9 score

      Just ran a half marathon at 4’50/km with them. Very comfy

  • avatar-comment-1020005
    Neve
    2 years ago
    10 score

    You must have a bunk pair, this midsole is way softer than v1

  • avatar-comment-1019959
    Randy Townsend
    2 years ago

    Used both Novablast 1 and 2. Never found them to be in any way a cushion shoe. The footbed was rock hard on both editions. I would take this review with a grain of salt.

  • avatar-comment-1019240
    David cheng
    2 years ago

    I also was blown away by the bounciness of the 1st version. In your opinion which shoe and model on the market reminds you of the 1st Nova that we can purchase today?

    • avatar-comment-1026117
      Richiebird
      1 year ago

      If cost isn’t an issue, you can try the New Balance Elite RC V2. It’s ordinary: having a similar bouncy and energetic ride like Nova Blast 1 or 2 but coming in a much lighter weight. It’s also softer.

    • avatar-comment-1021948
      Rick S
      1 year ago
      5 score

      Interesting and a bit confusing! What made V1 more springy?…just the grooves? So the foam here is softer. Mmm, where else should we look for springy /light/reasonably stable shoe? (Hoka?)

Lowest price:
$89

Where to buy

Best offers today in United States, all prices in USD

Similar shoes to Asics Novablast 3

ASICS METASPEED Edge Paris Review

The ASICS Metaspeed Edge Paris is a really fast but firm racer best suited to ... (Read expert review)

ASICS Gel Cumulus 26 Review

The Asics Gel-Cumulus 26 is a cushioned daily trainer that is an everyday shoe ... (Read expert review)

ASICS Dynablast 4 Review

The Dynablast is a marvelous everyday shoe. The lightweight feel and ... (Read expert review)